Experiments in open innovation at harvard medical school

MIT Sloan Management Review

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 45-52

  Guinan, Eva ^a,b   Boudreau, Kevin J ^c,d   Lakhani, Karim R ^e,f  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Harvard Catalyst   (United States)

^c LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^f Institute for Quantitative Social Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875771178     PISSN: 15329194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. K.J. Boudreau and K.R. Lakhani, "How to Manage Outside Innovation, " MIT Sloan Management Review 50, no. 4 (summer 2009): 69-76.
2. H.W. Chesbrough, "Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology" (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003).
3. E. von Hippel, "Democratizing Innovation" (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2005).
4. L.B. Jeppesen and K.R. Lakhani, "Marginality and Problem- Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search, " Organization Science 21, no. 5 (September/October 2010): 1016-1033.
5. K.J. Boudreau, N. Lacetera and K.R. Lakhani, "Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis, " Management Science 57, no. 5 (May 2011): 843-863.
6. P. Dasgupta and P. David, "Toward a New Economics of Science, " Research Policy 23, no. 5 (September 1994): 487-521;.
7. P. David, "Common Agency Contracting and the Emergence of 'Open Science' Institutions, " American Economic Review 88, no. 2 (May 1998);.
8. S. Stern, "Do Scientists Pay to Be Scientists?" Management Science 50, no. 6 (June 2004): 835-853.
9. P. Stephan, "How Economics Shapes Science" (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2012).
10. A. Einstein and L. Infeld, "The Evolution of Physics: From Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta" (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1938).
11. G.M. Carter, "What We Know and Do Not Know About the NIH Peer Review System, " RAND Corporation (1982);.
12. D.E. Chubin and E. J. Hackett, "Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy" (Albany, New York: SUNY Press, 1990);.
13. S. Cole, J.R. Cole and G.A. Simon, "Chance and Consensus in Peer Review, " Science 214, no. 4523 (November 20, 1981): 881-886;.
14. L. Langfeldt, "The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome, " Social Studies of Science 31, no. 6 (December 2001): 820-841.
15. D.F. Horrobin, "The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation, " Journal of the American Medical Association 263, no. 10 (March 9, 1990):1438-41;.
16. U. W. Jayasinghe, H.W. Marsh and N. Bond, "A Multilevel Cross-Classified Modeling Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Effects of Assessor and Researcher Attributes on Assessor Ratings, " Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 166, no. 3 (2003): 279-300.
17. S. Luckner et al., "Prediction Markets: Fundamentals, Designs, and Applications" (Munich, Germany: Gabler Verlag, 2012).
18. N. Silver, "The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail - But Some Don't" (New York: Penguin Press, 2012).
19. A.M. Weinberg, "Scientific Teams and Scientific Laboratories, " Daedalus 99, no. 4 (fall 1970): 1056-1075;.
20. S. Wuchty, B.F. Jones and B. Uzzi, "The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge, " Science 316, no. 5827 (May 18, 2007): 1036-1038.