The development of evidence-based guidelines in dentistry

Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 124-136

  Faggion, C M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Clinical education; Clinical guidelines; Clinical practice; Dental education; Evidence based dentistry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED DENTISTRY; HUMAN; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARD;

DENTAL CARE; DENTAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875769432     PISSN: 00220337     EISSN: 19307837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999;318(7182):527-30. (Pubitemid 29189000)
2. Ollenschläger G, Marshall C, Qureshi S, Rosenbrand K, Burgers J, Mäkelä M, et al. Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13(6):455-60. (Pubitemid 39647356)
3. American Academy of Periodontology. Index of AAP clinical and scientific papers. At: www.perio.org/resources-products/posppr2.html. Accessed: January 1, 2012.
4. Lang NP, Kinane DF, Lindhe J, Sanz M, Tonetti MS. Sixth European workshop on periodontology of the European Academy of Periodontology at the Charterhouse at Ittingen, Thurgau, Switzerland. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(8 Suppl):1-2.
5. American Dental Association. Clinical recommendations handbook. At: http://ebd.ada.org/contentdocs/ FINAL-2011-Revised-ADA-Clinical-Recommendations- Handbook.pdf. Accessed: June 2, 2012.
6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336(7650):924-6. (Pubitemid 351632017)
7. Faggion CM Jr, Giannakopoulos NN, Listl S. How strong is the evidence for the need to restore posterior bounded edentulous spaces in adults? Grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. J Dent 2011;39(2):108-16.
8. Faggion CM Jr. The shortened dental arch revisited: from evidence to recommendations by the use of the GRADE approach. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38(12):940-9.
9. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12(1):18-23.
10. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
11. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10.
12. Faggion CM Jr. Clinician assessment of guidelines that support common dental procedures. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2008;8(1):1-7.
13. Ijaz S, Croucher RE, Marinho VC. Systematic reviews of topical fluorides for dental caries: a review of reporting practice. Caries Res 2010;44(6):579-92.
14. Faggion CM Jr, Listl S, Giannakopoulos NN. The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry. Vet J, 2011 Sep 14. [Epub ahead of print]
15. Faggion CM Jr, Schmitter M. Using the best available evidence to support clinical decisions in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(5):960-9.
16. Suebnukarn S, Ngamboonsirisingh S, Rattanabanlang A. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics. J Endod 2010;36(4):602-8.
17. Bessa-Nogueira RV, Vasconcelos BC, Niederman R. The methodological quality of systematic reviews comparing temporomandibular joint disorder surgical and nonsurgical treatment. BMC Oral Health 2008;26(8):27.
18. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318(7183):593-6.
19. Faggion CM Jr, Tu YK. Evidence-based dentistry: a model for clinical practice. J Dent Educ 2007;71(6):825-31.
20. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. At: www. cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed: January 30, 2012.
21. Hujoel PP, DeRouen TA. A survey of endpoint characteristics in periodontal clinical trials published 1988-92 and implications for future studies. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22(5):397-407.
22. Hujoel PP, Leroux BG, DeRouen TA, Powell LV, Kiyak HA. Evaluating the validity of probing attachment loss as a surrogate for tooth mortality in a clinical trial on the elderly. J Dent Res 1997;76(4):858-66. (Pubitemid 127732677)
23. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. New York: Wiley, 2008.
24. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 2005;331(7524):1064-5. (Pubitemid 41597859)
25. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M, Egger M. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):MR000010.
26. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Scherer R. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):MR000001.
27. Thompson SG. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 1994;309(6965):1351-5. (Pubitemid 24345976)
28. Faggion CM Jr. Clinician assessment of guidelines that support common dental procedures. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2008;8(1):1-7.
29. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12(1):18-23.
30. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010;182(18):E839-42.
31. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ 2005;330(7482):68.
32. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
33. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10.
34. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62(10): 1013-20.
35. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:20.
36. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. BMC Health Serv Res 2004;4(1):38.
37. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(4):401-6.
38. Faggion CM Jr. Grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations in clinical dentistry: a critical review of 2 prominent approaches. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010;10(2):78-85.
39. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(4):407-15.
40. Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, Treadwell JR, Reston JT, Bass EB, et al. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the effective health care program. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63(5):513-23.
41. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(12):1283-93.
42. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(12):1294-302.
43. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328(7454):1490.
44. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337(8746):867-72.
45. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(12):1277-82.
46. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(12):1311-6.
47. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 2012 Apr 27. [Epub ahead of print]
48. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008;336(7652):1049-51.
49. Huynh-Ba G, Kuonen P, Hofer D, Schmid J, Lang NP, Salvi GE. The effect of periodontal therapy on the survival rate and incidence of complications of multirooted teeth with furcation involvement after an observation period of at least 5 years: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36(2):164-76.
50. van der Sanden WJ, Mettes DG, Plasschaert AJ, van't Hof MA, Grol RP, Verdonschot EH. Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: opinions of dental practitioners on their contribution to the quality of dental care. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12(2):107-11. (Pubitemid 36458147)
51. Wise J. Shared decision making must move from rhetoric to reality, says King's Fund. BMJ 2011;343:d4734.
52. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ 2011;342:d1745.
53. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(10):CD001431.
54. Gwet KL. Handbook of inter-rater reliability. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics, 2010.
55. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(4):383-94.
56. Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting health care quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 2011;6(6):e20476.
57. Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med 2011;8(1):e1000393.
58. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, Schulz KF; CONSORT Group. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2008;5(1):e20.