Effective stakeholder participation in setting research priorities using a Global Evidence Mapping approach

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 496-502.e2

  Clavisi, Ornella ^a   Bragge, Peter ^a   Tavender, Emma ^a   Turner, Tari ^b   Gruen, Russell L ^a  

^a NATIONAL TRAUMA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Evidence mapping; Prioritization; Rehabilitation; Research funding; Research gaps; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NAMED GROUPS OF PERSONS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH PRIORITY; SCIENTIST; STAKEHOLDER; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; WORKSHOP;

EID: 84875724765     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. S. Anderson, P. Allen, S. Peckham, and N. Goodwin Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services Health Res Policy Syst 6 2008 7
2. L. Kapiriri, and O.F. Norheim Whose priorities count? Comparison of community-identified health problems and Burden-of-Disease-assessed health priorities in a district in Uganda Health Expect 5 2002 55 62 (Pubitemid 34202589)
3. J.M. Yang, S.H. Yu, and W.H. Cho Research fields and priority setting for health sciences in Korea Yonsei Med J 28 1 1987 60 70
4. H.Z. Noorani, D.R. Husereau, R. Boudreau, and B. Skidmore Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches Int J Technol Assess Health Care 23 3 2007 310 315 (Pubitemid 46956887)
5. A.D. Oxman, H.J. Schunemann, and A. Fretheim Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting Health Res Policy Syst 4 2006 14
6. E. McKinlay, D. McLeod, T. Dowell, and P. Howden-Chapman Clinical practice guidelines: a selective literature review 2001 Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago for the New Zealand Guidelines Group Wellington, New Zealand
7. R.N. Battista, and M.J. Hodge Setting priorities and selecting topics for clinical practice guidelines CMAJ 153 9 1995 1233 1237
8. J. Doyle, E. Waters, D. Yach, D. McQueen, A. De Francisco, and T. Stewart Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research J Epidemiol Community Health 59 2005 193 197 (Pubitemid 40293108)
9. J. Lomas, N. Fulop, D. Gagnon, and P. Allen On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research Milbank Q 81 3 2003 363 388 (Pubitemid 37346996)
10. Institute of Medicine Knowing what works in health care: a roadmap for the nation 2008 National Academy Press Washington, DC
11. The Working Group on Priority Setting Priority setting for health research: lessons from developing countries. The Working Group on Priority Setting Health Policy Plan 15 2 2000 130 136
12. A. Bowling, B. Jacobson, and L. Southgate Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district Soc Sci Med 37 7 1993 851 857 (Pubitemid 23256380)
13. C. Sitthi-Amorn Health transition and needs-based technology planning and implementation Int J Technol Assess Health Care 11 1995 663 672 (Pubitemid 26007324)
14. S. Oliver, D. DArmes, and G. Gyte Evaluation of public influence on the NHS health technology assessment programme: Social Science Research Unit 2006 Institute of Education, University of London London, UK
15. F. Sassi Setting priorities for the evaluation of health interventions: when theory does not meet practice Health Policy 63 2002 141 151
16. P. Bragge, O. Clavisi, E. Tavender, T. Turner, and R. Gruen The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas BMC Med Res Methodol 11 2011 92
17. R. Teasell, N. Bayona, S. Marshall, N. Cullen, M. Bayley, and J. Chundamala A systematic review of the rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injuries Brain Inj 21 2007 107 112 (Pubitemid 46443628)
18. A. Van de Ven, and A. Delbecq Nominal versus interacting group pro-cesses for committee decision-making effectiveness Acad Manage J 14 2 1971 203 212
19. World Health Organization Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF - The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2002 World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland
20. World Health Organization. ICF Browser (Website). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008; Available at http://www.who.int/ classifications/icfbrowser/. Accessed August 21, 2008.
21. W.A. Gordon, R. Zafonte, K. Cicerone, J. Cantor, M. Brown, and L. Lombard Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: state of the science Am J Phys Med Rehabil 85 2006 343 382
22. S. Sibbald, P. Singer, R. Upshur, and D. Martin Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for priority setting BMC Health Serv Res 9 2009 43
23. F. Khan, I.J. Baguley, and I.D. Cameron Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury Med J Aust 178 2003 290 295
24. E. Arvidsson, M. Andre, L. Borgquist, and P. Carlsson Priority setting in primary health care - dilemmas and opportunities: a focus group study BMC Fam Pract 11 2010 71