Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0 T in the detection of prostate cancer: Strength and weaknesses

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 814-821

  Pelzer, Alexandre E ^a   Heinzelbecker, Julia ^b   Weiß, Christel ^b   Frühbauer, Dominik ^b   Weidner, Anja M ^b   Kirchner, Matthias ^c   Stroebel, Philipp ^b   Schoenberg, Stephan O ^b   Dinter, Dietmar J ^b  

^a KLINIKUM INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c Institute of Pathology Nordhessen   (Germany)

Author keywords

Elastography; Extra capsular extension; MRI; Prostate cancer; RTE; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ELASTOGRAPHY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REAL TIME SONOELASTOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84875716090     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.035     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. D. Shepherd, D.W. Keetch, P.A. Humphrey, D.S. Smith, and D. Stahl Repeat biopsy strategy in men with isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate needle biopsy Journal of Urology 156 1996 460 462
2. A.M. Weidner, H.J. Michaely, and A. Lemke Value of multiparametric prostate MRI of the peripheral zone Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik 21 3 2011 198 205
3. G. Salomon, J. Köllerman, and I. Thederan Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy European Urology 56 2008 1354 1362
4. M. Brock, C. von Bodman, and F. Sommerer Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy BJU International 108 2011 E217 E222
5. F. Aigner, L. Pallwein, and M. Schocke Comparison of real-time sonoelastography with T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 30 5 2011 643 649
6. M. Sumura, K. Shigeno, T. Hyuga, T. Yoneda, H. Shiina, and M. Igawa Initial evaluation of prostate cancer with real-time elastography based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study International Journal of Urology 14 2007 811 816 (Pubitemid 47313273)
7. A. Tanimoto, J. Nakashima, H. Kohno, H. Shinmoto, and S. Kuribayashi Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 25 2007 146 152 (Pubitemid 46095209)
8. M. Seitz, A. Shukla-Dave, and A. Bjartell Functional magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer European Urology 55 4 2009 801 814
9. A. Qayyum, F.V. Coakley, and Y. Lu Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging American Journal of Roentgenology 183 4 2004 1079 1083 (Pubitemid 44185100)
10. V.A. Morgan, S. Kyriazi, S.E. Ashley, and N.M. DeSouza Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection Acta Radiologica 48 6 2007 695 703 (Pubitemid 47147765)
11. M. Tsutsumi, T. Miyagawa, and T. Matsumura The impact of real-time tissue elasticity imaging (elastography) on the detection of prostate cancer: clinicopathological analysis International Journal of Clinical Oncology 12 2007 250 255 (Pubitemid 47262734)
12. L. Pallwein, M. Mitterberger, and P. Struve Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience BJU International 100 1 2007 42 46 (Pubitemid 46878542)
13. K. Yoshimitsu, K. Kiyoshima, and H. Irie Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient map in diagnosing prostate carcinoma: correlation with stepwise histopathology Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 27 1 2008 132 139
14. J.H. Kim, J.K. Kim, B.W. Park, N. Kim, and K.S. Cho Apparent diffusion coefficient: prostate cancer versus noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 28 5 2008 1173 1179
15. H.U. Ahmed, O. Akin, and J.A. Coleman Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer BJU International 109 11 2012 1636 1647
16. F. Cornud, M. Rouanne, and F. Beuvon Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5 Tesla: should we reconsider the indirect signs of extracapsular extension according to the D'Amico tumor risk criteria? European Journal of Radiology 81 4 2012 e591 e597
17. K.G. Nepple, H.M. Rosevear, A.H. Stolpen, J.A. Brown, and R.D. Williams Concordance of preoperative prostate endorectal MRI with subsequent prostatectomy specimen in high-risk prostate cancer patients Urologic Oncology 2011 Epub Jun 10
18. B. Kim, R.H. Breau, and D. Papadatos Diagnostic accuracy of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for local staging of elevated risk prostate cancer Canadian Urological Association Journal 4 4 2010 257 262
19. G.J. Jager, E.T. Ruijter, and C.A. van de Kaa Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results Radiology 203 3 1997 645 652 (Pubitemid 27227409)
20. L. Pallwein, M. Mitterberger, and P. Struve Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection European Radiology 17 9 2007 2278 2285 (Pubitemid 47288264)