The Cochrane Collaboration review prioritization projects show that a variety of approaches successfully identify high-priority topics

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 472-473

  Bero, Lisa A ^a   Binder, Lucie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE; SOCIAL STATUS;

EID: 84875700601     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.015     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. B. Buckley, A.M. Grant, and C.M. Glazener Case study: a patient-clinician collaboration that identified and prioritized evidence gaps and stimulated research development J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 483 489 [in this issue]
2. O. Clavisi, P. Bragge, E. Tavender, T. Turner, and R. Gruen Effective stakeholder participation in setting research priorities using a Global Evidence Mapping approach J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 496 502 [in this issue]
3. T. Li, A.M. Ervin, S. Scherer, H. Jampel, and K. Dickersin Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: a case study using primary open-angle glaucoma Ophthalmology 117 2010 1937 1945
4. M. Nasser, V. Welch, P. Tugwell, E. Ueffing, J. Doyle, and E. Waters Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritising topics for Cochrane reviews J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 474 482 [in this issue]
5. H. Handoll, D.J. Scott, L.J. Elstub, A.L. Kavanagh, and R. Madhok A framework for effective collaboration between specialist and broad-spectrum groups for delivering priority Cochrane reviews J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 490 495 [in this issue]
6. M. Nasser, E. Ueffing, V. Welch, and P. Tugwell Towards an equity-oriented approach to agenda setting and priority setting of Cochrane reviews J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 511 521 [in this issue]