A survey of access to trial of labor in California hospitals in 2012

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Barger, Mary K ^a   Dunn, Jennifer Templeton ^a   Bearman, Sage ^a   DeLain, Megan ^a   Gates, Elena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Access to care; Trial of labor after cesarean; Vaginal birth after cesarean

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BIRTH; CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL; CESAREAN SECTION; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; NURSE; PHYSICIAN; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; TRIAL OF LABOR; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; PATIENT SELECTION; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS;

CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84875660236     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-83     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Eng Med 1996, 335(10):689-695.
2. Stalnaker BL, Maher JE, Kleinman GE, Macksey JM, Fishman LA, Bernard JM. Characteristics of successful claims for payment by the Florida Neurologic Injury Compensation Association Fund. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 177(2):268-271. discussion 271-263, 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70186-8, 9290439.
3. Phelan JP. VBAC: time to reconsider?. OBG Manage 1996, 8:62-68.
4. Flamm BL. Once a cesarean, always a controversy. Obstet Gynecol 1997, 90(2):312-315. 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00263-9, 9241315.
5. ACOG Practice Bulletin Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery 1998, Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ACOG Practice Bulletin.
6. ACOG Practice Bulletin Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery 1999, Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ACOG Practice Bulletin.
7. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Michelle M, Osterman MJ, Wilson EC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2010. Nat Vit Stat Report 2012, 61(1):1-100.
8. Cox KJ. Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011, 11:72. 10.1186/1471-2393-11-72, 3203084, 21992871.
9. Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, Janik R, Nygren P, Eden KB, McDonagh M. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010, 115(6):1267-1278. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181df925f, 20502300.
10. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, Janik R, Nygren P, Walker M, McDonagh M. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2010, 191:1-397.
11. Bangdiwala SI, Brown SS, Cunningham FG, Dean TM, Frederiksen M, Hogue CJ, King TL, Lukacz ES, McCullough LB, Nicholson W. NIH Consensus Development Conference Draft Statement on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2010, 27(3):1-42.
12. Minkoff H, Fridman D. The immediately available physician standard. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(5):325-330. 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.05.005, 20869548.
13. ACOG Practice Committee Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery (Number 115). Obstet Gynecol 2010, 116(2 Pt 1):450-463. ACOG Practice Committee.
14. Community Perinatal Network Quality Improvement Data for California Perinatal Facilities and Regions http://www.perinatalnetwork.org/, Community Perinatal Network.
15. Coassolo KM, Stamilio DM, Pare E, Peipert JF, Stevens E, Nelson DB, Macones GA. Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 106(4):700-706. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000179389.82986.50, 16199624.
16. Grobman WA. Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(4):244-248. 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.003, 20654774.
17. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Eng Med 2004, 351(25):2581-2589.
18. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM, Pare E, Elovitz M, Sciscione A, Sammel MD. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193(5):1656-1662. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.002, 16260206.
19. State of California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Utilization rates for selected medical procedures in California 2010, http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/HID/Products/PatDischargeData/ResearchReports/HospIPQualInd/Vol-Util_IndicatorsRpt/index.html, State of California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
20. Shihady IR, Broussard P, Bolton LB, Fink A, Fridman M, Fridman R, Aydin C, Korst LM, Gregory KD. Vaginal birth after cesarean: do California hospital policies follow national guidelines?. J Reprod Med 2007, 52(5):349-358.
21. Center for Health Statistics California Births 2010, California Department of Public Health, http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Pages/StatewideBirthStatisticalDataTables.aspx, Center for Health Statistics.
22. Wells CE. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: views from the private practitioner. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(5):345-350. 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.05.008, 20869551.
23. Charles S. The ethics of vaginal birth after cesarean. Hastings Cent Rep 2012, 42(4):24-27.
24. Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006, 30(5):235-241. 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.002, 17011392.
25. Zweifler J, Garza A, Hughes S, Stanich MA, Hierholzer A, Lau M. Vaginal birth after cesarean in California: before and after a change in guidelines. Ann Fam Med 2006, 4(3):228-234. 10.1370/afm.544, 1479438, 16735524.
26. Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief 2010, 35:1-8.