Local ischaemia does not influence anastomotic healing: An experimental study

European Surgical Research

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 24-31

  Daams, F ^a   Monkhorst, K ^a   Van Den Broek, J ^a   Slieker, J C ^a   Jeekel, J ^a   Lange, J F ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anastomotic leakage; Local ischaemia; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; COLON ANASTOMOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HISTOPATHOLOGY; ISCHEMIA; MALE; MICROSCOPY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL TISSUE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MORTALITY; SUTURE;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; ANIMALS; COLON; ISCHEMIA; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84875655685     PISSN: 0014312X     EISSN: 14219921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000348411     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Rullier E, et al: Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 355- 358.
2. Guenaga KF, et al: Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 1:CD004647.
3. Matthiessen P, et al: Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 207-214.
4. Yeh CY, et al: Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 9-13.
5. Morks AN, et al: Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: a review. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4461-4469.
6. Ho YH, Ashour MA: Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1610-1621.
7. Allison AS, et al: The angiographic anatomy of the small arteries and their collaterals in colorectal resections: some insights into anastomotic perfusion. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 1092-1097.
8. Komen N, et al: High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 1075-1078.
9. Vignali A, et al: Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 76-82.
10. Lehmann RK, et al: Does sacrifice of the inferior mesenteric artery or superior rectal artery affect anastomotic leak following sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis? A retrospective review. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 623-627.
11. Posma LA, et al: Reduction of oxygenation and blood flow in pedicled bowel segments in the rat and its consequences for anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 93-100.
12. Karliczek A, et al: Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy for prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomoses. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 1018-1025.
13. Urbanavicius L, et al: How to assess intestinal viability during surgery: a review of techniques. World J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 3: 59-69.
14. Lustosa SA, et al: Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 3:CD003144.
15. de Hingh IH, et al: Colonic anastomotic strength and matrix metalloproteinase activity in an experimental model of bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 981-988.
16. Agren MS, et al: Nonselective matrix metalloproteinase but not tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibition effectively preserves the early critical colon anastomotic integrity. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 329-337.
17. Verhofstad MH, et al: Microscopic analysis of anastomotic healing in the intestine of normal and diabetic rats. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 423-431.
18. Goligher JC, et al: A controlled trial of inverting versus everting intestinal suture in clinical large-bowel surgery. Br J Surg 1970; 11: 817-822.
19. Thornton FJ, Barbul A: Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 549-573.
20. Waninger J, et al: Influence of the distance between interrupted sutures and the tension of sutures on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 1992; 163: 319-323.
21. Komen N, et al: Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a new experimental model. J Surg Res 2009; 155: 7-12.