Multidimensionality and scale in a landscape ethnoecological partitioning of a mountainous landscape (Gyimes, Eastern Carpathians, Romania)

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Babai, Dániel ^a   Molnár, Zsolt ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Ecological anthropology; Folk habitat; Mountain hay meadows; Nature conservation; Phytosociology; Traditional ecological knowledge

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ROMANIA; TREE;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ROMANIA; TREES;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875642612     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17464269     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-11     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Berlin B. Ethnobiological Classification. Principles of Categorisation of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies 1992, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. Johnson LM, Hunn ES. Introduction. Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 1-11. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
3. Meilleur B. Alluetain Ethnoecology and Traditional Economy: The Procurement and Production of Plant Resources in the Northern French Alps 1986, PhD thesis, Washington: University of Washington.
4. Meilleur B. The structure and Role of Folk Ecological Knowledge in Les Allues, Savoie (France). Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 159-174. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
5. Molnár Z. Traditional ecological knowledge of herders on the flora and vegetation of the Hortobágy 2012, Debrecen: Hortobágy Természetvédelmi Közalapítvány.
6. Péntek J, Szabó TA. Ember és növényvilág. Kalotaszeg növényzete és népi növényismerete[People and plantlife. The vegetation and folk plant knowledge of Kalotaszeg.] 1985, Bukarest: Kriterion Könyvkiadó.
7. Rab J. Népi növényismeret a Gyergyói-medencében. [Folk plant knowledge in the Gyergyó Basin.] 2001, Csíkszereda: Pallas-Akadémia Könyvkiadó.
8. Rotherham ID. The Implications of Perceptions and Cultural Knowledge Loss for the Management of Wooded Landscapes: A UK case-study. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2007, 249:100-115.
9. Nch I-W, . Hunn SE with J Selam and family The big river" . Mid-Columbia indians and their land 1990, Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, Hunn SE with J Selam and family.
10. Martin GJ. Ecological classification among the Chinantec and Mixe of Oaxaca, Mexico. Etnoecológica 1993, 1:17-33.
11. Shepard G, Yu DW, Lizarralde M, Italiano M. Rain Forest Habitat Classification among the Matsigenka of the Peruvian Amazon. J. Ethnobiol. 2001, 21:1-38.
12. Torre-Cuadros MA, Ross N. Secondary Biodiversity: Local Perceptions of Forest Habitats, the Case of Solferino, Quintana Roo, Mexico. J. Ethnobiol. 2003, 23:287-308.
13. Johnson LM. A Place That's Good. Gitksan Landscape Perception and Ethnoecology. Hum Ecol 2000, 28(2):301-325.
14. Verlinden A, Dayot B. A comparison between indigenous environmental knowledge and a conventional vegetation analysis in north central Namibia. J Arid Environ 2005, 62:143-175.
15. Halme KJ, Bodmer RE. Correspondence between Scientific and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Rain Forest Classification by the Non-indigenous Riberenos in Peruvian Amazonia. Biodivers Conserv 2007, 16:1785-1801.
16. Hernandez-Stefanoni JL, Pineda JB, Valdes V. Comparing the use of indigenous knowledge with classification and ordination techniques for assessing the species composition and structure of vegetation in a tropical forest. Environ. Manag. 2006, 37:686-702.
17. Roturier S, Roué M. Of forest, snow and lichen: Sámi reindeer herders' knowledge of winter pastures in northern Sweden. Forest Ecol. and Manag. 2009, 258:960-967.
18. Abraão MB, Shepard GH, Nelson BW, Baniwa JC, Andrello G, Yu DW. Baniwa Vegetation Classification in the White-Sand Campinarana Habitat of the Northwest Amazon, Brazil. Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 83-115. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
19. Davidson-Hunt I, Berkes F. Journeying and Remembering: Anishinaabe Landscape Ethnoecology from Northwestern Ontario. Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 222-240. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
20. Ellen R. Why aren't the Nuaulu like the Matsigenka? Knowledge and Categorization of Forest Diversity on Seram, Eastern Indonesia. Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 116-140. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
21. Gilmore MP, Ochoa SR, Flores SR. The Cultural Siginicance of the Habitat Maňaco Taco to the Maijuna of the Peruvian Amazon. Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 141-158. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
22. Hunn ES, Meilleur BA. Toward a Theory of Landscape Ethnoecological Classification. Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 15-26. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
23. Johnson LM, Hunn ES. Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
24. Mark DM, Turk AG, Stea D. Ethnophysiography of Arid Lands: Categories for Landscape Features. Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 27-48. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
25. Krohmer J. Landscape Perception, Classification, and Use among Sahelian Fulani in Burkina Faso. Landscape Ethnoecology. Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space 2010, 49-82. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, Johnson LM, Hunn ES.
26. Johnson LM. Trail of Story, Traveller's Path. Reflections on Ethnoecology and Landscape 2010, Athabasca: AU Press, Athabasca University.
27. Hájková P, Roleček J, Hájek M, Horsák M, Fajmon K, Polák M, Jamrichová E. Prehistoric origin of the extremly species-rich semi-dry grasslands int he Bílé Karpaty Mts (Czech Republic and Slovakia). Preslia 2011, 83:185-204.
28. Tasser E, Tappeiner U. Impact of land use changes on mountain vegetation. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2002, 5:173-184.
29. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecol Appl 2000, 10:1251-1262.
30. Menzies CR, Butler C. Introduction. Understanding Ecological Knowledge. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Natural Resource Management 2006, 1-17. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, Menzies CR.
31. Berkes F. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management 1999, Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
32. Brown J, Mitchell N, Beresford M. Preface. The protected landscape approach. Linking Nature, Culture and Community 2005, 9-10. Gland (Switzerland) and Cambridge: IUCN, Brown J, Mitchell N, Beresford M.
33. Molnár Z, Bartha S, Babai D. Traditional ecological knowledge as a concept and data source for historical ecology, vegetation science and conservation biology: A Hungarian perspective. Human Nature. Studies in Historical Ecology and Environmental History 2008, 14-27. Brno: Institute of Botany of the ASCR, Szabó P, Hedl R.
34. Borhidi A. Magyaroszág növénytársulásai. [Plant associations of Hungary.] 2003, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
35. Fleck DW, Harder JD. Matses indian rainforest habitat classification and mammalian diversity in amazonian Peru. J. Ethnobiol. 2000, 20:1-36.
36. Babai D, Molnár Z. Népi növényzetismeret Gyimesben II.: Termohely- és élohelyismeret. [Traditional ecological knowledge in Gyimes II.: Knowledge on habitats.]. Bot. Közlem 2009, 96:145-173.
37. Dobos F. A Gyimesi-szoros földrajza. [The geography of the Gyimes-strait.]Geographica Pannonica 33 1939, Pécs: Kultúra nyomda.
38. Pálfalvi P. A Gyimesi-hágó (1164 m) környékének florisztikai vázlata [Floristic sketch of the surroundings of the Gyimes Pass (1164 m).]. Múzeumi Füzetek (Az Erdélyi Múzeum Egyesület Természettudományi és Matematikai Szakosztályának Közleményei) 1995, 4:107-114.
39. Nechita N. Flora şi vegetaţia cormofitelor din Masivul Hǎşmas, Cheile Bicazului şi Lacu Roşu 2003, Piatra-Neamţ: Muzeul de Ştiinţe Naturale.
40. Ilyés Z. A tájhasználat változásai és a történeti kultúrtáj 18-20. századi fejlodése Gyimesben. [Landscape changes and the 18-20. century development of the historical cultural landscape in Gyimes.] 2007, Eger: Eszterházy Károly Foiskola.
41. Hofer T. A gyimesi csángó népcsoport kialakulása. [Origin of the Gyimes Csángó ethnic group.]. Antropológia és/vagy néprajz. Tanulmányok két kutatási terület vitatott határvidékérol. [Antropology and/or ethnography. Studies from the border region of two disciplines] 2009, 66-77. Budapest: L'Harmattan Kiadó, Hofer T.
42. Babai D. Magashegyi növényzet etnoökológiai értékelése a Keleti-Kárpátokban (Gyimes). (Ethnoecological evaluation of mountain vegetation in the Eastern Carpathians (Gyimes) 2012, University of Pécs: PhD Dissertation.
43. Kallós Z. Gyimesvölgyi keservesek [Said songs from Gyimes]. Néprajzi Közlem. 1960, 5:3-51.
44. Tánczos V. Gyimesi archaikus népi imádságok és ráolvasások. [Archaic prayers and incantations in Ghimes region.]. A Kriza János Néprajzi Társaság Évkönyve 2. [Annals of the Kriza János Ethnographic Society. 2.] 1994, 211-243. Kolozsvár: Kriza János Néprajzi Társaság, Zakariás E, Keszeg V.
45. Pócs E. Eloszó. [Foreword.]. Vannak csodák, csak észre kell venni. Helyi vallás, néphit és vallásos folklór Gyimesben I. [There are wondres, if you see them. Local religion, folk beliefs and religious folkore in Gyimes] 2008, 7-14. Budapest: L'Harmattan Kiadó, Pócs E.
46. Sólyom A, Knowles B, Bogdán J, Rodics G, Biró R, Nyíro G. Small scale farming in the Pogány-havas Region of Transylvania. Farming statistics, agricultural subsidies, the future of farming. Final Report 2011, 97. Miercurea Ciuc: Pagan Snow Cap association.
47. Bíró R, Demeter L, Knowles B. Farming and management of hay meadows in Csík and Gyimes - Experiences from social research. Mountain hay meadows. Hotspots of biodiversity and traditional culture 2012, Knowles B, http://mountainhaymeadows.eu/online_publication/11-farming-and-management-of-hay-meadows-in-csik-and-gyimes.htmlLast download: on the 27th October 2012.
48. Krausmann F. Milk, Manure and Muscle Power. Livestock and the Transformation of Preindustrial Agriculture in Central Europe. Hum Ecol 2004, 32:735-772.
49. Molnár Z, Babai D. Népi növényzetismeret Gyimesben I.: Növénynevek, népi taxonómia, az egyéni és közösségi növényismeret. [Folk plant knowledge in Gyimes I.: Plant names, folk taxonomy, plant knowledge on individual and community level.]. Bot. Közlem 2009, 96(1-2):117-143.
50. Puri RK, Watson CW, . Newing, H Conducting Research in Conservation. A social science perspective 2011, 376. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, Newing, H.
51. Grey-Wilson C, Blamey M. Pareys Bergblumenbuch: wildblühende Pflanzen der Alpen, Pyrenäen, Apenninen, der skandinavischen und britischen Gebirge 1980, Hamburg, Berlin: Parey.
52. Ellen R. The cultural relations of classification: an analysis of Nuaulu animal categories from central Seram 1993, 315. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Hunn E. Toward a perceptual model of folk biological classification. American Ethnologist 1976, 3(3):508-524.
54. Molnár Z. Classification of Pasture Habitats by Hungarian Herders in a Steppe Landscape (Hungary) 2012, Ethnomed: J. Ethnobiol, (accepted).
55. Netting RMC. Balancing on an Alp. Ecological change & continuity in a Swiss mountain community 1981, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Johann E, Agnoletti M, Bölöni J, Erol SC, Holl K, Kusmin J, Latorre JG, Molnár Z, Rochel X, Rotherham ID, Saratsi E, Smith M, Tarang L, Benthem M, Laar J. Europe. Traditional Forest-Related Knowledge Sustaining Communities, Ecosystems and Biocultural Diversity, World Forests 12 2012, 203-249. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer Science + Business Media B. V, Parotta JA, Trosper RL.