Morphological and molecular identification to secure cultivar maintenance and management of self-sterile Rubus arcticus

Annals of Botany

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 713-721

  Kostamo, K ^a,b   Toljamo, A ^a   Antonius, K ^c   Kokko, H ^a   Karenlampi S O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b Rural Advisory Center   (Finland)

^c FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Arctic bramble; authenticity; cultivar maintenance; cultivar purity; genetic resources conservation; identification; morphological markers; preservation; Rubus arcticus ssp. arcticus; self incompatibility; SSR markers; UPOV

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT; CROP IMPROVEMENT; CROP PRODUCTION; CROP YIELD; CULTIVAR; DNA; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENETIC MARKER; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MAINTENANCE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PARAMETERIZATION; SUGAR;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA BARCODING; FINLAND; FLOWER; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT INFERTILITY; PLANT LEAF; ROSACEAE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SELF FERTILIZATION;

DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; FINLAND; FLOWERS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PLANT INFERTILITY; PLANT LEAVES; ROSACEAE; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

HEXAPODA; RUBUS; RUBUS ARCTICUS; RUBUS IDAEUS;

EID: 84875623441     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct029     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aaltonen M, Antonius K, Karhu S, et al. 2006. Suomen kansallisten kasvivarojen pitkaaikaissailytysohjeet, Hedelma-ja marjakasvit. Maa-ja elintarviketalous 89: 134-138.
2. AEGIS. 2010. Template for the preparation of operational genebank manuals. http://aegis.cgiar.org/fileadmin/www.aegis.org/FOR-WEB-FINAL/Template- final240910.pdf (accessed 18 April 2012).
3. Bassil NV. 2012. Microsatellite markers: valuable in Vaccinium L. International Journal of Fruit Science 12: 288-293.
4. Bassil NV, Muminova M, Njuguna W. 2010. Microsatellite-based fingerprinting of western blackberries from plants, IQF berries and puree. Acta Horticulturae 859: 73-80.
5. Chebotar S, Roder M, Korzum V, Saal B, Weber W, Borner A. 2003. Molecular studies on genetic integrity of open pollinating species rye (Secale cereale L.) after long-term genebank maintenance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 1469-1476.
6. Dossett M, Bassil NV, Finn CE. 2012. SSR fingerprinting of black raspberry cultivars shows discrepancies in identification. Acta Horticulturae 946: 49-53.
7. Ervi L, Hanioja P, Kivinen E. 1955. Mesimarjan (Rubus arcticus L.) marjontaa koskevia tutkimuksia. Acta Agriculturae Fenniae 83: 93-112.
8. FAO. 2010. The second Report on the state of the world's plant genetic resources. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1500e/Finland.pdf (accessed 18 April 2012).
9. Fernandez-Fernandez F, Antanaviciute L, Govan CL, Sargent DJ. 2011. Development of a multiplexed microsatellite set for fingerprinting red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) germplasm and its transferability to other Rubus species. Journal of Berry Research 1: 177-187.
10. Govan CL, Simpson DW, Johnson AW, Tobutt KR, Sargent DJ. 2008. A reliable multiplexed microsatellite set for genotyping Fragaria and its use in a survey of 60 F.×ananassa cultivars. Molecular Breeding 22: 649-661.
11. Graf W. 2010. Key for the main assortment of Ilex aquifolium cultivars in Central Europe based on leaf morphology. Acta Horticulturae 885: 123-130.
12. Graham J, Smith K,Woodhead M, Russell J. 2002. Development and use of simple sequence repeat SSR markers in Rubus species. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 250-252.
13. Hakkinen S, Kokko H, Karenlampi S. 1995. Sugars and organic acids in clones and cultivars of arctic bramble and hybrid. Sensory evaluation of juices and jellies. Agricultural Science in Finland 4: 385-395.
14. Hukkanen A, Kostamo K, Karenlampi S, Kokko H. 2008. Impact of agrochemicals on Peronospora sparsa and phenolic profiles in three Rubus arcticus cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56: 1008-1016.
15. Hulten E. 1967. The Circumpolar plants. II Dicotyledons. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskasakademiens handlingar 13: 164-165.
16. IPGRI International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. 2002. Report of a Working Group on Medical and Aromatic Plants. First Meeting, 12-14 September 2002. http://www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/984- Report-of-a-working-group-on-medicinal-and-aromatic-plants. pdf (accessed 23 March 2012).
17. Kallio H, Laine M, Huopalahti R. 1980. Aroma of the berries of the hybrid Rubus stellatus Sm.×R. arcticus L. Reports of Kevo Subarctic Research Station 16: 17-22.
18. Larsson G. 1969. Experimental taxonomy as a base for breeding in northern rubi. Hereditas 63: 283-351.
19. Lindqvist-Kreuze H, Koponen H, Valkonen J. 2003. Genetic diversity of arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L. subsp. arcticus) as measured by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Canadian Journal of Botany 81: 805-813.
20. MTT. 2012. https://portal.mtt.fi/portal/pls/portal/!TAI-MTT.TAI-MTT-RP- TUOTELUETTELO.report (accessed 11 September 2012; in Finnish).
21. Pirinen H, Dalman P, Karenlampi S, Tammisola J, Kokko H. 1998. Description of three new arctic bramble cultivars and proposal for cultivar identification. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 7: 455-468.
22. Reed B, Engelmann F, Dulloo M, Engels J. 2004. Technical guidelines for the management of field and in vitro germplasm collection. IPGRI Handbooks for Genebanks No. 7. http://www.sgrp.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/Field- InVitroGuidelines.pdf (accessed 14 May 2012).
23. Ryynanen A. 1972. Arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.) a new cultivated plant. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 11: 170-1723.
24. Ryynanen A. 1973. Rubus arcticus L. and its cultivation. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 12: 1-76.
25. Ryynanen A, Dalman P. 1983. A new variety of arctic bramble 'Pima'. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 22: 1-7.
26. Saastamoinen S. 1930. Mesimarja (Rubus arcticus L.) Suomessa. Annales Zoologicae Botanicae Society Fenniae Vanamo 13: 356-414. SGSV Data Portal. 2010. http://www.nordgen.org/sgsv (accessed 18 March 2012).
27. Tammisola J. 1988. Incompatibility classes and fruit set in natural populations of arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.) in Finland. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 60: 323-446.
28. UPOV. 2003. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability, Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). http://www.upov.int/ edocs/tgdocs/en/tg043.pdf (accessed 14 May 2012).
29. UPOV, 2008. Examining distinctness. http://www.upov.int/export/sites/ upov/en/publications/tgp/documents/tgp-9-1.pdf (accessed 15 May 2012).
30. UPOV. 2010. Guidelines for DNA-Profiling: molecular marker selection and database construction (BMT Guidelines). http://www.upov.int/edocs/mdocs/upov/en/ tc-edc/2006/bmt-guidelines-proj-4.pdf (accessed 14 May 2012).
31. UPOV. 2012. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability, Strawberry (Fragaria L.). http://www.upov.int/edocs/ tgdocs/en/tg022.pdf (accessed 14 May 2012).
32. USDA-ARS National Genetic Resource Program. 2011. NCGR-Corvallis Rubus Catalog. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) database. Rubus arcticus. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/swish/accboth?si=0&query= rubus+arcticus&x=0&y=0&btnG=Go!&filter=0& as-sitesearch=ars.usda.gov&ie=&output=xml-no-dtd&client=usda&lr= &proxystylesheet=ARS&oe= (accessed 21 March 2012).
33. Vool E, Karp K, Starast M, Paal T, Luik A. 2011. Growth habit of arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus) within Kaansoo Conservation area in Estonia. Baltic Forestry 17: 170-178.
34. van de Wouw M, van Treuren R, van Hintum T. 2011. Authenticity of old cultivars in genebank collections: a case study on lettuce. Crop Science 51: 736-746.