Towards activity recognition using probabilistic description logics

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-12-05, Issue , 2012, Pages 26-31

  Helaoui, Rim ^a   Riboni, Daniele ^b   Niepert, Mathias ^a   Bettini, Claudio ^b   Stuckenschmidt, Heiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; ACTIVITY REPRESENTATION; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; CONTEXT-AWARE COMPUTING; EXPRESSIVE DESCRIPTION LOGIC; INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENT; PROBABILISTIC DESCRIPTIONS; PROBABILISTIC REASONING;

FORMAL LANGUAGES; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

DATA DESCRIPTION;

EID: 84875611232     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Artale, A., and Franconi, E. 1998. A temporal description logic for reasoning about actions and plans. J Artif Intell Res 9:463-506. (Pubitemid 128636210)
2. Bettini, C.; Brdiczka, O.; Henricksen, K.; Indulska, J.; Nicklas, D.; Ranganathan, A.; and Riboni, D. 2010. A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 6(2):161-180.
3. Bouchard, B.; Giroux, S.; and Bouzouane, A. 2006. A smart home agent for plan recognition of cognitively-impaired patients. Journal of Computers 1(5):53-62.
4. Buettner, M.; Prasad, R.; Philipose, M.; and Wetherall, D. 2009. Recognizing daily activities with rfid-based sensors. In Proc. of Ubicomp'09, 51-60. ACM.
5. Chen, L.; Nugent, C. D.; and Wang, H. 2011. A knowledge-driven approach to activity recognition in smart homes. IEEE T. Knowl. Data En. 99(PrePrints).
6. Cirillo, M.; Lazellotto, F.; Pecora, F.; and Saffiotti, A. 2009. Monitoring domestic activities with temporal constraints and components. In Proc. of IE'09, 117-124. IOS Press.
7. Grau, B. C.; Horrocks, I.; Motik, B.; Parsia, B.; Patel-Schneider, P. F.; and Sattler, U. 2008. OWL 2: The next step for OWL. J Web Semant 6(4):309-322.
8. Gu, T.; Chen, S.; Tao, X.; and Lu, J. 2010. An unsupervised approach to activity recognition and segmentation based on object-use fingerprints. Data Knowl Eng 69(6):533-544.
9. Helaoui, R.; Niepert, M.; and Stuckenschmidt, H. 2011. Recognizing interleaved and concurrent activities using qualitative and quantitative temporal relationships. Pervasive Mob Comput 7(6):660-670.
10. Hong, X.; Nugent, C.; Mulvenna, M.; McClean, S.; Scotney, B.; and Devlin, S. 2009. Evidential fusion of sensor data for activity recognition in smart homes. Pervasive Mob Comput 5(3):236-252.
11. Knox, S.; Coyle, L.; and Dobson, S. 2010. Using ontologies in case-based activity recognition. In Proc. of FLAIRS'10. AAAI Press.
12. Knublauch, H.; Fergerson, R. W.; Noy, N. F.; and Musen, M. A. 2004. The protégé owl plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In Proc. of ISWC'04, volume 3298 of LNCS, 229-243. Springer.
13. Latfi, F.; Lefebvre, B.; and Descheneaux, C. 2007. Ontology-based management of the telehealth smart home, dedicated to elderly in loss of cognitive autonomy. In Proc. of OWLED'07, volume 258 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org.
14. Lukowicz, P.; Pirkl, G.; Bannach, D.; Wagner, F.; Calatroni, A.; Förster, K.; Holleczek, T.; Rossi, M.; Roggen, D.; Tröster, G.; Doppler, J.; Holzmann, C.; Riener, A.; Ferscha, A.; and Chavarriaga, R. 2010. Recording a complex, multi modal activity data set for context recognition. In Proc. of ARCS '10, 161-166. VDE Verlag.
15. Lutz, C., and Milicic, M. 2007. A tableau algorithm for description logics with concrete domains and general tboxes. J. Autom. Reasoning 38(1-3):227-259. (Pubitemid 46362158)
16. Niepert, M.; Noessner, J.; and Stuckenschmidt, H. 2011. Log-linear description logics. In Proc. of IJCAI'11, 2153-2158. IJCAI/AAAI.
17. Noessner, J., and Niepert, M. 2011. ELOG: a probabilistic reasoner for OWL EL. In Proc. of RR'11, 281-286. Springer.
18. Patterson, D. J.; Fox, D.; Kautz, H.; and Philipose, M. 2005. Fine-grained activity recognition by aggregating abstract object usage. In Proc. of ISWC'05, 44-51. IEEE Comp. Soc.
19. Riboni, D., and Bettini, C. 2011. Cosar: hybrid reasoning for context-aware activity recognition. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 15(3):271-289.
20. Springer, T., and Turhan, A.-Y. 2009. Employing description logics in ambient intelligence for modeling and reasoning about complex situations. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 1(3):235-259.
21. Stikic, M., and Schiele, B. 2009. Activity recognition from sparsely labeled data using multi-instance learning. In Proc. of LoCA'09, volume 5561 of LNCS. Springer. 156-173.
22. Wang, S.; Pentney, W.; Popescu, A.-M.; Choudhury, T.; and Philipose, M. 2007. Common sense based joint training of human activity recognizers. In Proc. of IJCAI'07, 2237-2242. Morgan Kaufmann.
23. Yamada, N.; Sakamoto, K.; Kunito, G.; Isoda, Y.; Yamazaki, K.; and Tanaka, S. 2007. Applying ontology and probabilistic model to human activity recognition from surrounding things. IPSJ Digital Courier 3:506-517.