The Reconstitution of Political Theory: David Easton, Behavioralism, and the Long Road to System

Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 190-210

  Gunnell, John G ^a,b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875609517     PISSN: 00225061     EISSN: 15206696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.21593     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adcock, R. (2007). Interpreting behavioralism. In R. Adcock, M. Bevir, & S. C. Stimson (Eds.), Modern political science: Anglo-American exchanges since 1880 (pp. 108-208). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. Anderson, W. (1953). Review of the political system. American Political Science Review, 47, 862-865.
3. Ball, T. (1993). American political science in its postwar context. In J. Farr, & R. Seidelman (Eds.), Discipline and history: Political science in the United States (pp. 207-221). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
4. Bang, H. (1998). David Easton's postmodern images. Political Theory, 26, 281-316.
5. Burns, E. M. (1953). Review of the political system. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 289, 190.
6. Dahl, R. (1955). The science of politics: Old and new. World Politics, 7, 479-489.
7. Dahl, R. (1961). The behavioral approach in political science: Epitaph for a monument to a successful protest. American Political Science Review, 55, 763-772.
8. Dahl, R., & Lindblom, C. (1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Easton, D. (1949). Walter Bagehot and liberal realism. American Political Science Review, 43, 17-34.
10. Easton, D. (1951). The decline of modern political theory. Journal of Politics, 13, 36-58.
11. Easton, D. (1951). Harold Lasswell: Policy scientist for a democratic society. Journal of Politics, 13, 450-477.
12. Easton, D. (1953). The political system. New York: Knopf.
13. Easton, D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics, 9, 383-400.
14. Easton, D. (1962). The limits of behavioralism in political science. In J. Charlesworth (Ed.), Political science (pp. 11-31). Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
15. Easton, D. (Ed.). (1966). Varieties of political theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Easton, D. (1968). Political science, method and theory. In D. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 12 (pp. 295-297). New York: Macmillan.
17. Easton, D. (1969). The new revolution in political science. American Political Science Review, 63, 1051-1061.
18. Easton, D. (1990). The analysis of political structure. New York: Routledge.
19. Easton, D. (1991). Divided knowledge: Across disciplines, across cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1969). Children in the political system: Origins of political legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Easton, D., Gunnell, J. G., & Graziano, L. (Eds.). (1991). The development of political science: Comparative survey. New York: Routledge.
22. Easton, D., Gunnell, J. G., & Stein, M. (Eds.). (1995). Regime and discipline: Democracy and the development of political science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23. Eulau, H. (1954). Review of the Political System. Yale Law Journal, 63, 1050-1052.
24. Farr, J. (1995). Remembering the revolution: Behavioralism in American political science." In J. Farr, J. S. Dryzek, & S. T. Leonard (Eds.), Political science in history: Research programs and political traditions (pp. 198-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Farris, C. D. (1953). Review of the political system. Journal of Politics, 15, 544-547.
26. Garceau, O. (1953). Review of the political system. Political Science Quarterly, 68, 434-436.
27. Gunnell, J. G. (1993) The descent of political theory: The genealogy of an American vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Gunnell, J. G. (1997). Paradoxos Theoretikos. In K. R. Monroe (Ed.), Contemporary empirical political theory (pp. 47-70). Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Gunnell, J. G. (2004a) Imagining the American polity: Political science and the discourse of democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
30. Gunnell, J. G. (2004b) The real revolution in political science. Political Science and Politics, 37, 47-50.
31. Gunnell, J. G. (2006). The founding of the American Political Science Association: Discipline, profession, political theory, and politics. American Political Science Review, 100, 79-86.
32. Hauptmann, E. (2006). From accommodation to opposition: How Rockefeller Foundation grants redefined relations between political theory and social science in the 1950s. American Political Science Review, 100, 643-649.
33. Herring, P. (1940). Politics of democracy. New York: Norton.
34. Isaac, J. (2007). The human sciences in cold war America. Historical Journal, 50, 725-746.
35. Kress, P. (1966). Self, system, and significance: Reflections on professor Easton's political science. Ethics, 77, 1-13.
36. Magid, H. M. (1955). Review of the political system. Ethics, 65, 201-205.
37. Mayo, H. B. (1954). Review of the political system. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 20, 272-274.
38. Miller, E. F. (1971). David Easton's political theory. Political Science Reviewer, 1, 184-235.
39. Smithburg, D. W. (1954). Review of the political system. American Journal of Sociology, 59, 95-96.
40. Strong, T. (1998). David Easton: reflections on an American scholar. Political Theory, 26, 267-280.
41. Truman, D. (1951). The governmental process: Political interests and public opinion. New York: Knopf.
42. Williams, M. H. (1954). Review of the political system. Journal of Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 131-132.