Design flaws in EuroSCORE II

European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 871-

  Collins, Gary S ^a   Altman, Douglas G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design; EuroSCORE; Risk prediction; Validation

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; EUROSCORE; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STUDY DESIGN; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84875606480     PISSN: 10107940     EISSN: 1873734X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs562     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41:734-44.
2. Nashef SA, Sharples LD, Roques F, Lockowandt U. EuroSCORE II and the art and science of risk modelling. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43: 695-6.
3. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJJM, Eijkemans MJC, Vergouwe YHabbema JDF. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54: 774-81.
4. Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 2000;19:453-73.
5. Moons KG, Kengne AP, Woodward M, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Altman DG et al. Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker. Heart 2012;98: 683-90.
6. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. New York: Springer, 2008.