Differences in the effects of anti-tobacco health education programme in the areas of knowledge, attitude and behaviour, with respect to nicotinism among boys and girls

Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 173-177

  Kanicka, Magdalena ^a   Poniatowski, Bogusław ^b   Szpak, Andrzej ^a   Owoc, Alfred ^c  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF BIALYSTOK   (Poland)

^b Laboratory of Flowcytometry   (Poland)

^c Higher School of Public Health   (Poland)

Author keywords

Anti tobacco health education programme; Gender; Health education; Junior high school adolescents; Tobacco smoking

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT; HUMAN; MALE; POLAND; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM; SMOKING HABIT; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; POLAND; SEX FACTORS; SMOKING;

NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 84875605355     PISSN: 12321966     EISSN: 18982263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ramadas K, Sauvaget C, Thomas G, Fayette JM, Thara S, Sankaranarayanan R. Effect of tobacco chewing, tobacco smoking and alcohol on all-cause and cancer mortality: a cohort study from Trivandrum, India. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010; 34(4): 405-412.
2. Kaori H, Hiroyasu I, Shoichiro T, Akiko T, Hiroshi S, Kazuo T, et al. The effects of smoking and smoking cessation on mortality from cardiovascular disease among Japanese: pooled analysis of three largescale cohort studies in Japan. Tob Control. 2010; 19: 50-57.
3. Hrubá D, Zachovalová V, Matějová H, Daňková I. "Our class does not smoke"; the czech version of the "Smoke-free class competition" programme. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2007; 15 (4): 163-166.
4. Marmon G, Flak E. Przeciwdziałanie uzależnieniom wśród dzieci I młodzieży szkolnej na przykładzie programów antynikotynowych. Promocja zdrowia. Nauki Społeczne i Medycyna. 2000; 7(19): 145-155.
5. Borucka A, Okulicz-Kozaryn K, Pisarska A. Pierwsze doświadczenia zwia{ogonek}zane z wprowadzaniem szkolnej interwencji wobec uczniów używaja{ogonek}cych substancji psychoaktywnych. Alkoh Narkom. 2002; 15(2): 241-251.
6. Kowalewska A, Woynarowska B, Mazur J. Ocena wdrażania i realizacji edukacji prozdrowotnej w szkołach podstawowych i gimnazjach w roku szkolnym 1999/2000. Wych Fiz Zdr. 2001; 48(6/7): 32-37.
7. Woynarowska B. Edukacja zdrowotna. 1st ed. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2008.
8. Zatoński W, Przewoźniak K. Palenie tytoniu a fizjologia człowieka [Film]. PWN, 2006.
9. Graham JW, Johnson CA, Hansen WB, Flay BR, Gee M. Drug use prevention programs, gender, and ethnicity: evaluation of three seventh-grade Project SMART cohorts. Prev Med. 1990; 19:305-13.
10. Longshore D, Ellickson PL, McCaffrey DF, St. Clair PA. School-based drug prevention among at-risk adolescents: effects of ALERT Plus. Health Educ Behav. 2007; 34: 651-68.
11. Klepp KI, Tell GS, Vellar OD. Ten-year follow-up of the Oslo Youth Study Smoking Prevention Program. Prev Med. 1993; 22: 453-62.
12. Vigna-Taglianti F, Vadrucci S, Faggiano F, Burkhart G, Siliquini R, Galanti MR. Is universal prevention against youths' substance misuse really universal? Gender-specific effects in the EU-Dap school-based prevention trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009; 63(9): 722-8.
13. Różnice w wynikach nauczania a płeć uczniów. Obecna sytuacja I działania podejmowane w Europie. EURIDICE, FRSE, Warszawa 2010.
14. Edukacja zróżnicowana ze wzgle{ogonek}du na płeć. EURIDICE, FRSE, Warszawa 2007
15. Mazurkiewicz G, Bebnik B. Kształcenie chłopców i dziewcza{ogonek}t. Naturalny porza{ogonek}dek nierówność czy dyskryminacja? CEO, Warszawa 2006.
16. Does peer education work in Europe? Entre Nous, 56, WHO, 2003.
17. Szilágyi T. Peer education of tobacco issues in Hungarian communities of Roma and socially disadvantaged children. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2002; 10(3): 117-20.
18. McDonald D. Alcohol and Other Drug Peer Education in Schools: A review for the ACT Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Strategy Implementation and Evaluation Group. Social Research and Evaluation, Austrarlia, 2004.
19. Black D, Tobler N, Sciacca J. Peer helping/involvement: an efficacious way to meet the challenge of reducing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among youth? J Sch Health. 1998; 68: 87-93.
20. Webster RA, Hunter M, Keats JA. Evaluating the effects of a peer support program on adolescents' knowledge, attitudes and use of alcohol and tobacco. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2002; 21(1): 7-16.
21. Rajani R, Berman DS, Rozanski A. Social networks-are they good for your health? The era of Facebook and Twitter. QJM. 2011; 104(9): 819-20.
22. Freeman B, Chapman S. Measuring interactivity on tobacco control websites. J Health Commun. 2012; 17(7): 857-65.