Identifying antitrust markets

The International Handbook of Competition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 290-305

  Geroski, Paul ^a   Griffith, Rachel ^b  

^a United Kingdom Competition and Markets Authority   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875600327     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845423520.00013     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Baker, J. and T. Bresnahan (1985): ‘The gains from merger or collusion in product differentiated industries’, Journal of Industrial Economics 33, 427-44.
2. Baker, J. and D. Rubinfeld (1999): ‘Empirical methods in antitrust litigation: review and critique’, American Law and Economics Review 1 (1/2), 386-425.
3. Competition Commission (2002): ‘Economic guidance’ (available from the website).
4. EC (1997): ‘Notice on the definition of the relevant market for the purposes of community competition law’, OJ C372, 09/12/97.
5. Elzinga, K. and T. Hogarty (1973): ‘The problem of geographical market definition’, Antitrust Bulletin 18: 45-81.
6. Fisher, F. (1987): ‘Horizontal mergers: triage and treatment’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 40, 23-40.
7. Forni, M (2002): ‘Using stationarity tests in antitrust market definition’, CEPR Working Paper 3236.
8. Geroski, P. (1998): ‘Thinking creatively about markets’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 16, 677-96.
9. Gilbert, R. and D. Sunshine (1995): ‘Incorporating dynamic efficiency concerns in merger analysis’, Antitrust Law Journal 63, 509-97.
10. Harrington, J., J.M. Vernon and W.K. Viscusi (2000): Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Hausman, J., G. Leonard and C. Velturo (1996): ‘Market definition under price discrimination’, Antitrust Law Journal 64, 367-86.
12. Kovacic, W (1997): ‘Administrative adjudication and the use of new economic approaches in antitrust analysis’, George Mason Legal Review 5, 313-20.
13. Neumann, M. (2001): Competition Policy, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
14. OFT (1999a): ‘Quantitative techniques in competition analysis’, OFT Research Paper 266.
15. OFT (1999b): ‘Market definition’, OFT Working Paper 403.
16. OFT (1999c): ‘Assessment of market power’, OFT Working Paper 415.
17. OFT (2001): ‘The role of market definition in monopoly and dominance inquiries: a report prepared for the OFT by NERA’, OFT Economic Discussion Paper 2.
18. Porter, M. (1980): Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press.
19. Rapp, R. (1995): The ‘misapplication of the innovation market approach to merger analysis’, Antitrust Law Journal 64, 19-47.
20. Scheffman, D. and P. Spiller (1987): ‘Geographical market definition under the USDOJ merger guidelines’, Journal of Law and Economics 30, 123-47.
21. Slade, M. (1986): ‘Exogeneity tests of market boundaries applied to petroleum products’, Journal of Industrial Economics 34, 291-304.
22. Steen, F. and K.G. Salvanes (1999): ‘Testing for market power using a dynamic oligopoly model’, International Journal of Industrial Organisation 17, 147-77.
23. US DOJ (1992): ‘Horizontal merger guidelines’, www.ftc.gov/bc/docs/horizmer.htm