A systematic investigation of blocking strategies for real-time classification of social media content into events

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-12-02, Issue , 2012, Pages 8-15

  Reuter, Timo ^a   Cimiano, Philipp ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA POINTS; DATA RATES; SET OF EVENTS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA DATUM; SYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATIONS; USER INTERVENTION; USER-GENERATED CONTENT;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84875592813     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Baxter, R.; Christen, P.; and Churches, T. 2003. A Comparison of Fast Blocking Methods for Record Linkage. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Data Cleaning, Record Linkage, and Object Consolidation, 25-27.
2. Becker, H.; Naaman, M.; and Gravano, L. 2010. Learning similarity metrics for event identification in social media. In Proceedings of the third ACM International Conference on Web search and Data Mining, 291-300.
3. Bilenko, M.; Kamath, B.; and Mooney, R. J. 2006. Adaptive Blocking: Learning to Scale Up Record Linkage. In Proc. of the 6th IEEE International Conf. on Data Mining, 87-96.
4. Chaudhuri, S.; Ganjam, K.; Ganti, V.; and Motwani, R. 2003. Robust and efficient fuzzy match for online data cleaning. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 313-324. ACM.
5. Cohen, W., and Richman, J. 2002. Learning to match and cluster large high-dimensional data sets for data integration. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 475-480. ACM.
6. Fellegi, I., and Sunter, A. 1969. A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1183-1210.
7. Firan, C. S.; Georgescu, M.; Nejdl, W.; and Paiu, R. 2010. Bringing order to your photos: event-driven classification of flickr images based on social knowledge. In 19th Int'l. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, 189-198.
8. Hernández, M., and Stolfo, S. 1998. Real-world data is dirty: Data cleansing and the merge/purge problem. Data mining and knowledge discovery 2(1):9-37. (Pubitemid 128696797)
9. Jaro, M. 1989. Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association 414-420.
10. Jin, L.; Li, C.; and Mehrotra, S. 2003. Efficient record linkage in large data sets. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 2003.(DASFAA 2003). Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on, 137-146. IEEE.
11. Kelley, R. 1984. Blocking considerations for record linkage under conditions of uncertainty. SRD research report. Bureau of the Census.
12. McCallum, A. K.; Nigam, K.; and Ungar, L. 2000. Efficient Clustering of High-Dimensional Data Sets with Application to Reference Matching. In Proc. of the 6th International Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 169-178.
13. Michelson, M., and Knoblock, C. 2006. Learning Blocking Schemes for Record Linkage. In Proc. of the 21st National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence - Vol. 1, 440-445.
14. Platt, J., et al. 1999. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. Advances in large margin classifiers 10(3):61-74.
15. Rattenbury, T., and Naaman, M. 2009. Methods for extracting place semantics from Flickr tags. ACM Transactions on the Web 3(1):1.
16. Rendle, S., and Schmidt-Thieme, L. 2006. Object identification with constraints. In Data Mining, 2006. ICDM'06. Sixth International Conference on, 1026-1031. IEEE.
17. Rendle, S., and Schmidt-Thieme, L. 2008. Scaling Record Linkage to Non-uniform Distributed Class Sizes. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 308-319.
18. Robertson, S., and Jones, K. 1976. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information science 27(3):129-146.
19. Winkler, W. E. 2005. Approximate string comparator search strategies for very large administrative lists. Technical report, Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.