Assessing the Preconditions for Communication Influence on Decision Making: The North American Quitline Consortium

Health Communication

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 248-259

  Bonito, Joseph A ^a   Ruppel, Erin K ^b   Saul, Jessie E ^c   Leischow, Scott J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c North American Quitline Consortium ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NORTH AMERICA; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEPHONE;

COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; HOTLINES; HUMANS; NORTH AMERICA; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 84875585665     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: 15327027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2012.673245     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2. Au, A. K. M. and Yeung, M. C. H. 2007. Modelling Chinese manufacturers' technology adoption behaviour. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 4: 131-147. doi:10.1386/jots.4.2.131_1
3. Barge, J. K. and Keyton, J. 1994. "Contextualizing power and social influence in groups". In Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups, Edited by: Frey, L. R. 85-106. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bonito, J. A. and Sanders, R. E. 2009. A different approach to answering a good question: A response to Hewes's models of communication effects on small group outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35: 296-303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01351.x
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). MMWR Weekly: Current cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥18 years-United States, 2005-2010 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6035a5.htm?s_cid=mm6035a5_w
6. Clarke, P. 2008. When can group level clustering be ignored? Multilevel models versus single-level models with sparse data. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62: 752-758. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.060798
7. Cohen, S., Lichtenstein, E., Prochaska, J. O., Rossi, J. S., Gritz, E. R., Carr, C. R.and Ossip-Klein, D. 1989. Debunking myths about self-quitting: Evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves. American Psychologist, 44: 1355-1365. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.11.1355
8. Cordano, M. and Frieze, I. 2000. Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 627-641. doi:10.2307/1556358
9. Enders, C. K. and Tofighi, D. 2007. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12: 121-138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
10. Godin, G., Belanger-Gravel, A., Eccles, M. and Grimshaw, J. 2008. Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implementation Science, 3: 1-12. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-36
11. Gouran, D. S. and Hirokawa, R. Y. 1996. "Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view". In Communication and group decision making, Edited by: Hirokawa, R. Y. and Poole, M. S. 55-80. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Grandon, E. and Mykytyn, P. Jr. 2004. Theory-based instrumentation to measure the intention to use electronic commerce in small and medium sized businesses. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44: 44-57.
13. Hatcher, L. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
14. Health Canada. (2010). Canadian tobacco use monitoring survey http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/research-recherche/stat/ctums-esutc_2010_graph-eng.php
15. Hirokawa, R. Y. 1990. The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy: A task-contingency perspective. Small Group Research, 21: 190-204.
16. Hirokawa, R. Y. and Salazar, A. J. 1999. "Task-group communication and decision-making performance". In The handbook of group communication theory and research, Edited by: Frey, L. R. 167-191. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A. and Cook, W. L. 2006. Dyadic data analysis, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18. Laughlin, P. R. 1999. Collective induction: Twelve postulates. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 80: 50-69. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2854
19. Leischow, S., Provan, K., Beagles, J., Bonito, J., Ruppel, E., Moor, G. and Saul, J. In press. Mapping the North American network of smoking cessation quitlines: Network states and traits. American Journal of Public Health,
20. Lim, J. 2003. A conceptual framework on the adoption of negotiation support systems. Information & Software Technology, 45: 469-478. doi:10.1016/S0950-5849(03)00027-2
21. Lu, C., Lai, K. and Cheng, T. C. E. 2007. Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use Internet services in liner shipping. European Journal of Operational Research, 180: 845-867. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.001
22. Marshall, R. S., Cordano, M. and Silverman, M. 2005. Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalism in the US Wine industry. Business Strategy & the Environment, 14: 92-109. doi:10.1002/bse.433
23. McGrath, J. E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. McGrath, J. E. and Hollingshead, A. B. 1994. Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues, and an agenda, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Messer, K., Trinidad, D. R., Al-Delaimy, W. K. and Pierce, J. P. 2008. Smoking cessation rates in the United States: A comparison of young adult and older smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 98: 317-322. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.112060
26. North American Quitline Consortium. 2006. Quitlines of North America and Europe 2006, Phoenix, AZ: North American Quitline Consortium.
27. Orlitzky, M. and Hirokawa, R. Y. 2001. To err is human, to correct for it divine: A meta-analysis of research testing the functional theory of group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 32: 313-341.
28. Pavitt, C. 1993. Does communication matter in social influence during small group discussion? Five positions. Communication Studies, 44: 216-227.
29. Riemenschneider, C. K. and McKinney, V. R. 2002. Assessing belief differences in small business adopters and non-adopters of Web-based e-commerce. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42: 101
30. Sager, K. L. and Gastil, J. 1999. Reaching consensus on consensus: A study of the relationships between individual decision-making styles and use of the consensus decision-rule. Communication Quarterly, 47: 67-79.
31. Sager, K. L. and Gastil, J. 2006. The origins and consequences of consensus decision making: A test of the social consensus model. Southern Communication Journal, 71: 1-24.
32. Salazar, A. J. 1996. Ambiguity and communication effects on small group decision-making performance. Human Communication Research, 23: 155-192.
33. Salazar, A. J. 1997. Communication effects on small group decision-making: Homogeneity and task as moderators of the communication-performance relationship. Western Journal of Communication, 61: 35-65. doi:10.1080/10570319709374561
34. Salazar, A. J., Hirokawa, R. Y., Propp, K. M. and Julian, K. M. 1994. In search of true causes: Examination of the effect of group potential and group interaction on decision performance. Human Communication Research, 20: 529-559.
35. Scott, S. D., Kessler, R. C., Karunamuni, N., Bize, R. and Rodgers, W. 2008. Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: An examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK). Implementation Science, 3: 1-8. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-41
36. Stasser, G. 1998. A primer of social decision scheme theory: Models of group influence, competitive model-testing, and prospective modeling. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 80: 3-20. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2851
37. Straus, S. G. 1999. Testing a typology of tasks: An empirical validation of McGrath's (1984) group task circumplex. Small Group Research, 30: 166-187.
38. To, P., Liao, C., Chiang, J. C., Shih, M. and Chang, C. 2008. An empirical investigation of the factors affecting the adoption of instant messaging in organizations. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 30: 148-156. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2007.08.019
39. Turan, J. M., Bulut, A., Nalbant, H., Ortayli, N. and Erbaydar, T. 2006. Challenges for the adoption of evidence-based maternity care in Turkey. Social Science & Medicine, 62: 2196-2204. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.005
40. Weingart, L. R., Brett, J. M., Olekalns, M. and Smith, P. L. 2007. Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93: 994-1010. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.994