A list of fish species that are potentially exposed to pesticides in edge-of-field water bodies in the European Union-a first step towards identifying vulnerable representatives for risk assessment

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 2679-2687

  Ibrahim, Lara ^a,b   Preuss, Thomas G ^b   Ratte, Hans Toni ^b   Hommen, Udo ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND APPLIED ECOLOGY IME   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aquatic; Ditch; Plant protection products; Pond; Stream

Indexed keywords

DISPERSAL; FISH; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; LANDSCAPE; PESTICIDE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EUROPE;

EID: 84875547098     PISSN: 09441344     EISSN: 16147499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1471-x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ashauer R, Escher BI (2010) Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment. J Environ Monit 12(11): 2056-61.
2. Benejam L, Angermeier PL, Munne A, Garcia-Berthou E (2010) Assessing effects of water abstraction on fish assemblages in Mediterranean streams. Freshwater Biol 55: 628-642.
3. Calow P, Forbes VE (2003) Does ecotoxicology inform ecological risk assessment? Environ Sci Technol 37(7): 146A-151A.
4. Clavero M, Zamora L, Pou-Rovira Q (2009) Biology and habitat use of three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in intermittent Mediterranean streams. Ecol Freshw Fish 18: 550-559.
5. Cairns J Jr (1986) The myth of the most sensitive species. BioScience 36(10): 670-672.
6. Copp GH (1992) An empirical model for predicting microhabitat of 0+ juvenile fishes in a lowland river catchment. Oecologia 91: 338-345.
7. Copp GH, Kovac V, Siryova S (2010) Microhabitat use by stream-dwelling spirlin Alburnoides bipunctatus and accompanying species: implications for conservation. Folia Zool 59(3): 240-256.
8. Copp GH, Warrington S, Wesley K (2008) Management of an ornamental pond as a conservation site for a threatened native fish species, crucian carp Carassius carassius. Hydrobiologia 597: 149-155.
9. Council Directive 92/43/EEC (1992) The conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official J European Union Legislation 206(22): 7.
10. Davies BR, Biggs J, Williams PJ, Thompson S (2009) Making agricultural landscapes more sustainable for freshwater biodiversity: a case study from southern England. Aquat Conserv 19: 439-447.
11. De Lange HJ, Lahr J, van der Pol JJC, Wessels Y, Faber JH (2009) Ecological vulnerability in wildlife: An expert judgment and multicriteria analysis tool using ecological traits to assess relative impact of pollutants. Environ Toxicol Chem 28: 2233-2240.
12. De Lange HJ, Sala S, Vighi M, Faber JH (2010) Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment-a review and perspectives. Sci Total Environ 408: 3871-3879.
13. Drecomm (2011) Ecomare. Web page. www. ecomare. nl, version (12/2011).
14. Dussling U, Berg R (2001) Fish in Baden-Württemberg. Ministry of agriculture and rural areas, Baden-Württemberg: Stuttgart, DE (in German).
15. EFSA (2008) Scientific opinion of the panel on plant protection products and their residues on a request from the EFSA PRAPeR Unit on risk assessment for birds and mammals. The EFSA Journal 734: 1-181.
16. EFSA (2010) Panel on plant protection products and their residues: scientific opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the guidance documents on aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). The EFSA Journal 8(10): 1821.
17. European Commission (2009) Regulation No 1107/2009 of the European parliament and of the council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing council directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels (BE).
18. FOCUS (2001) FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on surface Water Scenarios. EC Document Reference Sanco/4802/2001-rev. 2.
19. Forbes VE, Hommen U, Thorbek T, Heimbach F, van den Brink PJ, Wogram J, Thulke HH, Grimm V (2009) Ecological models in support of regulatory risk assessments of pesticides: developing a strategy for the future. Integr Environ Assess Manag 5: 167-172.
20. Forbes VE, Calow P, Grimm V, Hayashi T, Jager T, Palmqvist A, Pastorok R, Salvito D, Sibly R, Spromberg J, Stark J, Stillman RA (2010) Integrating population modeling into ecological risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6: 191-193.
21. Froese R, Pauly D eds (2011) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www. fishbase. org, version (12/2011).
22. Galic N, Hommen U, Baveco J, van den Brink PJ (2010) Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals II: review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims. Integrated Environ Assess Manag 6: 338-360.
23. Gergs A, Classen S, Hommen U, Preuss TG (2011) Identification of realistic worst case aquatic macroinvertebrate species for prospective risk assessment using the trait concept. Environ Sci Pollut R 18: 1316-1323.
24. Grimm V, Ashauer R, Forbes V, Hommen U, Preuss TG, Schmidt A, van den Brink PJ, Wogram J, Thorbek P (2009) CREAM: a European project on mechanistic effect models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Environ Sci Pollut R 16(6): 614-617.
25. Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2007) Second Report by the UK under Article 17 on the implementation of the Habitats Directive from January 2001 to December 2006. Peterborough: JNCC. Available from: www. jncc. gov. uk/article17.
26. Kottelat M, Freyhof J (2007) Handbook of european freshwater fishes. Cornol, Switzerand & Berlin, Germany, Kottelat & Freyhof.
27. Liess M, Kattwinkel M, Kaske O, Beketov M, Steinicke H, Scholz M, Henle K (2010) Considering protected aquatic non-target species in the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, DE.
28. Martens K, Vyverman W, Kestemont P, Losson B, De Meester L (2008) Project EV/29-integrated management tools for water bodies in agricultural landscapes (M A N S C A P E). BE, Brussels.
29. Munns WR, Gervais JA, Hoffman AA, Hommen U, Nacci DE, Nakamaru M, Sibly R, Topping CJ (2007) Modeling approaches to population-level ecological risk assessment. In: Barnthouse LW, Munns WR, Sorensen MT (eds) Population-level ecological risk assessment. Taylor and Francis, USA, pp 179-210.
30. Newman MC, Ownby DR, Mézin LCA, Powell DC, Christensen TRL, Lerberg SB, Anderson BA (2000) Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 508-515.
31. Oberdorff T, Pont D, Hugueny B, Chessel D (2001) A probabilistic model characterizing fish assemblages of French rivers: a framework for environmental assessment. Freshwater Biol 46: 399-415.
32. OECD (1984) guideline for testing of chemicals 204: fish, prolonged toxicity test, 14-day study. Adopted 4 April 1984. OECD: Paris, France.
33. OECD (1992a) guideline for testing of chemicals 203: fish, acute toxicity test. Adopted 17 July 1992. OECD: Paris, France.
34. OECD (1992b) guideline for testing of chemicals 210: fish, early-life stage toxicity test. Adopted 17 July 1992. OECD: Paris, France.
35. OECD (1996) guideline for testing of chemicals 305: proposal for updating guideline 305, bioconcentration, flow-through fish test. Adopted 14 June 1996. OECD: Paris, France.
36. OECD (1998) guideline for testing of chemicals 212: fish, short-term toxicity test on embryo and sac-fry stages. Adopted 21 September 1998. OECD: Paris, France.
37. OECD (2000) guideline for testing of chemicals 215: fish, juvenile growth test. Adopted 21 January 2000. OECD: Paris, France.
38. OECD (2009a) guideline for testing of chemicals 229: fish short term reproduction assay. Adopted 7 September 2009. OECD: Paris, France.
39. OECD (2009b) guideline for testing of chemicals 230: 21-day fish assay, a short-term screening for oestrogenic and androgenic activity, and aromatase inhibition. Adopted 7 September 2009. OECD: Paris, France.
40. OECD (2011) guideline for testing of chemicals 234: fish sexual development test. Adopted 28 July2011. OECD: Paris, France.
41. Ottburg FGWA, Jong Td (2006) Fish in polder ditches; the impact of dredging on fish and amphibians in open and 'closed' ditches. Alterra: Wageningen, NL (in Dutch).
42. Ottburg FGWA, Jong Td (2009) Fish in polder ditches part 2; establishment and management measures in Lakerveld and Zaans Rietveld polder ditches in favor of fish. Alterra: Wageningen, NL (in Dutch).
43. Raimondo S, Vivian DN, Barron MG (2010) Web-based interspecies correlation estimation (Web-ICE) for Acute Toxicity: User Manual. Version 3. 0. EPA/600/R-10/004. Gulf Breeze, FL.
44. Raimondo S, Vivian DN, Delos C, Barron MG (2008) Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 2599-2607.
45. Saavedra DB (2002) Reintroduction of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Muga and Fluvià basins (northeastern Spain): viability, development, monitoring and trends of the new population. PhD thesis, University of Girona.
46. Schmolke A, Thorbek P, Chapman P, Grimm V (2010) Ecological models and pesticide risk assessment: current modeling practice. Environ Toxicol Chem 29: 1006-1012.
47. Segner H, Navas JN, Schaefers C, Wenzel A (2003) Potencies of estrogenic compounds in in vitro screening assays and in life cycle tests with zebrafish in vivo. Ecotox Environ Safe 54: 315-322.
48. Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Jensen JP (2005) Pond or lake: does it make any difference? Arch Hydrobiol 162: 143-165.
49. Stadnicka J, Schirmer K, Ashauer R (2012) Predicting concentrations of organic chemicals in fish by using toxicokinetic models. Environ Sci Technol 46(6): 3273-3280.
50. Stark JD, Banks JE, Vargas R (2004) How risky is risk assessment: the role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress. P Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 732-736.
51. Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, de Snoo GR, Rakosy L, Ramwell C (2009) Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe-a review. J Environ Manage 91: 22-46.
52. van Straalen NM (1994) Biodiversity of ecotoxicological responses in animals. Neth J Zool 44(1-2): 112-129.
53. Vilcinskas A (1993) Native freshwater fishes: all types: characteristics, distribution, life history. Naturbuch Verlag: Augsburg, DE (in German).
54. Wogram J (2010a) Ecological characterization of small streams in northern and central Germany. In: Brock TCM, Alix A, Brown CD, Capri E, Gottesbüren BFF, Heimbach F, Lythgo CM, Schulz R, Streloke M (eds) Linking aquatic exposure and effects: risk assessment of pesticides. CRC Press, USA, pp 250-255.
55. Wogram J (2010b) Regulatory challenges for the potential use of ecological models in risk assessments of plant protection products. In: Thorbek P, Forbes VE, Heimbach F, Hommen U, Thulke H, van den Brink PJ, Wogram J, Grimm V (eds) Ecological models for regulatory risk assessments of pesticides: developing a strategy for the future. CRC Press, USA, pp 27-31.
56. Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem services and disservices to agriculture. Ecol Econ 64: 253-260.