'Niche modeling': That uncomfortable sensation means it's working. A reply to McInerny and Etienne

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 193-194

  Warren, Dan L ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; LETTER; METHODOLOGY;

DEMOGRAPHY; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84875545579     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.003     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. McInerny G.J., Etienne R.S. 'Niche' or 'distribution' modelling?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:191-192.
2. Warren D.L. In defense of 'niche modeling'. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:497-500.
3. Elith J., Leathwick J.R. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:677-697.
4. Soberón J., Peterson A.T. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodivers. Inform. 2005, 2:1-10.
5. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions 2011, Princeton University Press. A.T. Peterson (Ed.).
6. Anderson R.P. Harnessing the world's biodiversity data: promise and peril in ecological niche modeling of species distributions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1260:66-80.