Group housing with electronically controlled crates for lactating sows. Effect on farrowing, suckling and activity behavior of sows and piglets

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 145, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 37-43

  Bohnenkamp, Anna Lena ^a   Meyer, Christian ^b   Müller, Karin ^b   Krieter, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b Futterkamp Agriculture Research Farm   (Germany)

Author keywords

Milk flow; Missing and foreign piglets; Resting place; Running area; Udder massage

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PATTERN; DISTURBANCE; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; LACTATION; NESTING BEHAVIOR; PIG; WALKING;

EID: 84875537296     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andersen I.L., Naevdal E., Bøe K.E. Maternal investment, sibling competition, and offspring survival with increasing litter size and parity in pigs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2011, 65:1159-1167.
2. Arellano P.E., Pijoan C., Jacobson L.D., Algers B. Stereotyped behaviour, social interactions and suckling pattern of pigs housed in groups or in single crates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992, 35:157-166.
3. Bates R.O., Edwards D.B., Korthals R.L. Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 79:29-35.
4. Baxter E.M., Lawrence A.B., Edwards S.A. Alternative farrowing systems: design criteria for farrowing systems based on the biological needs of sows and piglets. Animal 2011, 5(4):580-600.
5. Bøe K. Maternal behaviour of lactating sows in a loose-housing system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1993, 35:327-338.
6. Bøe K. Variation in maternal behaviour and production of sows in integrated loose housing systems in Norway. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994, 41:53-62.
7. Bohnenkamp, A.-L., Traulsen, I., Meyer, C., Müller, K., Krieter, J., 2012a. Group housing for lactating sows with electronically controlled crates - 1. Reproductive traits, body condition and feed intake. J. Anim. Sci., unpublished results.
8. Bohnenkamp A.-L., Traulsen I., Meyer C., Müller K., Krieter J. Comparison of growth performance and agonistic interaction in weaned piglets of different weight classes from farrowing systems with group or single housing. Animal, available on CJO 2012, 10.1017/S1751731112001541.
9. Bünger B. Einflüsse der Haltungsbedingungen von ferkelnden und ferkelführenden Sauen auf die Entwicklung der Ferkel: Eigene Studien und eine Bewertung der Literatur. Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 2002, 109:277-289.
10. Council Directive 91/630/EEC, 2003. Council Directive 91/630/EEC of 19 November 1991 laying down standards for the protection of pigs; Official Journal No L 340 p. 33, amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 of 14 April 2003; Official Journal No L 122 p. 1.
11. Damm B.I., Forkman B., Pedersen L.J. Lying down and rolling behaviour in sows in relation to piglet crushing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 90:3-20.
12. Danholt L., Mousten V.A., Nielsen M.B.F., Kristensen A.R. Rolling behaviour of sows in relation to piglet crushing on sloped versus level floor pens. Livestock Sci. 2011, 141:59-68.
13. D'Eath R.B. Socialising piglets before weaning improves social hierarchy formation when pigs are mixed post-weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 93:199-211.
14. Devillers N., Farmer C. Effects of a new housing system and temperature on sow behaviour during lactation. Acta Agric. Scand. A 2008, 58:55-60.
15. Edwards, S., 2008. Balancing sow and piglet welfare with production efficiency. London Swine Coference 1. 2. April 2008. London. Ontario. Canada, 17-30.
16. Gu Z., Gao Y., Lin B., Zhong Z., Liu Z., Wang C., Li B. Impact of a freedom farrowing pen design on sow behaviours and performance. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 102:296-303.
17. Hurvich C.M., Tsai C.L. Regression and time-series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 1989, 76:297-307.
18. Jais, C., Abriel, M.,Oppermann, P., 2009. Gruppenhaltung von Saugferkeln aus fünf verschiedenen Würfen, Einzelhaltung der Muttersauen - ein Modell für die Praxis. LFL Bayern Versuchsbericht, Accessed Aug. 20, 2009. http://www.lfl.bayern.de/itt/tierhaltung/schweine/34851/index.php.
19. Jensen P. Observations on the maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1986, 16:131-142.
20. Jensen P., Redbo I. Behaviour during nest leaving in free-ranging domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987, 18:355-362.
21. Jensen P., Stangel G., Algers B. Nursing and suckling behaviour of semi-naturally kept pigs during the first 10 days postpartum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1991, 31:195-209.
22. Jensen P. Fighting between unacquainted pigs - effects of age and of individual reaction pattern. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994, 41:37-42.
23. Kutzer, T., 2009. Untersuchung zum Einfluss einer frühzeitigen Kontaktmöglichkeit zwischen Ferkelwürfen auf Sozialverhalten, Gesundheit und Leistung. PhD Diss. Justus-Liebig-Universität in Gießen. Germany.
24. Maletinska J., Spinka M. Cross-suckling and nursing synchronisation in group housed lactating sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001, 75:17-32.
25. Marchant J.N., Broom D.M., Corning S. The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system. Anim. Sci. 2001, 72:19-28.
26. Oliviero C., Heinonen M., Valros A., Hälli O., Peltoniemi O.A.T. Effect of the environment on the physiology of the sow during late pregnancy, farrowing and early lactation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 105:365-377.
27. Pajor E.A., Weary D.M., Caceres C., Fraser D., Kramer D.L. Alternative housing for sows and litters part 3. Effects of piglet diet quality and sow-controlled housing on performance and behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 76:267-277.
28. Pitts A.D., Weary D.M., Pajor E.A., Fraser D. Mixing at young ages reduces fighting in unacquainted domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 68:191-197.
29. SAS Institute Inc. User's Guide (release 9.2) 2008, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
30. Schwarz G. Estimating dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6:461-464.
31. Silerova J., Spinka M., Sarova R., Slamova K., Algers B. A note on differences in nursing behaviour on pig farms employing individual and group housing of lactating sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006, 101:167-176.
32. Swanson J.C. Farm animal well-being and intensive production systems. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73:2744-2751.
33. Tierschutz-Nutztierhaltungsverordnung, 2006. Verordnung zum Schutz landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere und anderer zur Erzeugung tierischer Produkte gehaltener Tiere bei ihrer Haltung. http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/tierschutztv/gesamt.pdf.
34. van Dijk A.J., van Rens B.T.T.M., van der Lende T., Taverne M.A.M. Factors affecting duration of the expulsive stage of parturition and piglet birth intervals in sows with uncomplicated, spontaneus farrowings. Theriogenology 2005, 64:1573-1590.
35. Vallet J.L., Miles J.R., Brown-Brandl T.M., Nienaber J.A. Proportion of the litter farrowed, litter size, and progesterone and estradiol effects on piglet birth intervals and stillbirths. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 119:68-75.
36. Wattanakul W., Stewart A.H., Edwards S.A., English P.R. Effects of grouping piglets and changing sow location on suckling behaviour and performance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 55:21-35.
37. Weary D., Pajor E., Bonenfant M., Fraser D., Kramer D. Alternative housing for sows and litters part 4. Effect of sow-controlled housing combined with a communal piglet area on pre- and post-weaning behaviour and performance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 76:279-290.
38. Weber R., Keil N.M., Fehr M., Horat R. Factors affecting piglet mortality in loose farrowing systems on commercial farms. Livestock Sci. 2009, 124:216-222.