TV parenting practices: Is the same scale appropriate for parents of children of different ages?

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Volumn 10, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Chen, Tzu An ^a   O'Connor, Teresia M ^a   Hughes, Sheryl O ^a   Frankel, Leslie ^a   Baranowski, Janice ^a   Mendoza, Jason A ^a   Thompson, Debbe ^a   Baranowski, Tom ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential item functioning; Item response modeling; Multidimensional; Parenting practices; TV

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD PARENT RELATION; FAMILY FUNCTIONING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARENTING EDUCATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOMETRY; SCHOOL CHILD; TELEVISION VIEWING;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; PARENTING; PARENTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TELEVISION; TEXAS;

EID: 84875531623     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14795868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-41     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF. Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation 2010, http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf.
2. Robinson TN. Reducing children's television viewing to prevent obesity: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999, 282:1561-1567. 10.1001/jama.282.16.1561, 10546696.
3. Jackson DM, Djafarian K, Stewart J, Speakman JR. Increased television viewing is associated with elevated body fatness but not with lower total energy expenditure in children. Am J Clin Nutr 2009, 89:1031-1036. 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26746, 19244374.
4. Miller SA, Taveras EM, Rifas-Shiman SL, Gillman MW. Association between television viewing and poor diet quality in young children. Int J Pediatr Obes 2008, 3:168-176. 10.1080/17477160801915935, 19086298.
5. Paavonen EJ, Roine M, Pennonen M, Lahikainen AR. Do parental co-viewing and discussions mitigate TV-induced fears in young children?. Child Care Health Dev 2009, 35:773-780. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01009.x, 19735268.
6. Schmidt ME, Haines J, O'Brien A, McDonald J, Price S, Sherry B, Taveras EM. Systematic review of effective strategies for reducing screen time among young children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012, 20:1338-1354.
7. Davison KK, Li K, Baskin ML, Cox T, Affuso O. Measuring parental support for children's physical activity in white and African American parents: The Activity Support Scale for Multiple Groups (ACTS-MG). Prev Med 2011, 52:39-43. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.11.008, 3022380, 21111755.
8. Jago R, Davison KK, Brockman R, Page AS, Thompson JL, Fox KR. Parenting styles, parenting practices, and physical activity in 10- to 11-year olds. Prev Med 2011, 52:44-47. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.11.001, 3025352, 21070805.
9. Valkenburg PM, Krcmar M, Peeters AL, Marseille NM. Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: " Instructive mediation" , " restrictive mediation" , and " social coviewing" J Broadcast Electron Media 1999, 43:52-66.
10. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H. Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications 1985, Boston: Kluwer Nijoff Publishing.
11. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory 1991, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..
12. Dennison BA, Erb TA, Jenkins PL. Television viewing and television in bedroom associated with overweight risk among low-income preschool children. Pediatrics 2002, 109:1028-1035. 10.1542/peds.109.6.1028, 12042539.
13. Anderson DR, Huston AC, Schmitt KL, Linebarger DL, Wright JC. Early Childhood Television Viewing and Adolescent Behavior 2001, Boston, MA: Basil Blackwell.
14. Certain LK, Kahn RS. Prevalence, correlates, and trajectory of television viewing among infants and toddlers. Pediatrics 2002, 109:634-642. 10.1542/peds.109.4.634, 11927708.
15. Bolt D, Stout W. Differential item functioning: Its multidimensional model and resulting SIBTEST detection procedure. Behaviormetrika 1996, 23:67-95.
16. Baranowski T, Abdelsamad D, Baranowski J, O'Connor TM, Thompson D, Barnett A, Cerin E, Chen TA. Impact of an active video game on healthy children's physical activity. Pediatrics 2012, 129:e636-e642. 10.1542/peds.2011-2050, 3289528, 22371457.
17. O'Connor TM, Hilmers A, Watson K, Baranowski T, Giardino AP. Feasibility of an obesity intervention for paediatric primary care targeting parenting and children: Helping HAND. Child Care Health Dev 2011, [Epub ahead of print].
18. Springer DM. An examination of parental awareness and mediation of media consumed by fifth grade students [Doctoral Dissertation] 2011, Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.
19. Warren R. Parental mediation of preschool children's television viewing. J Broadcast Electron Media 2003, 47:394-417.
20. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory 1978, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2.
21. SAS Institute Inc SAS Version (9.2) 2008, Cary, NC: [Computer Software], SAS Institute Inc.
22. IBM Corp IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20.0 2011, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, [Computer Software], IBM Corp.
23. Reeve BB, Mâsse LC. Item response theory modeling for questionnaire evaluation. Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires 2004, 247-273. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Presser S, Rothgeb JM, Couper MP, Lessler JT, Martin E, Martin J, Singer E.
24. Costa PT, McCrae RR. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) 1992, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
25. Chernyshenko O, Stark S, Chan KY, Drasgow F, Williams B. Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories: Issues and insights. Multivariate Behav Res 2001, 36:523-562.
26. Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating Scale Analysis 1982, Chicago: MESA Press.
27. Andrich D. Application of a psychometric rating model to ordered categories which are scored with successive integers. Appl Psychol Meas 1978, 2:581-594.
28. Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978, 43:561-573.
29. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model 2001, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2.
30. Smith RM, Schumacker RE, Bush MJ. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. J Outcome Meas 1998, 2:66-78.
31. Osteen P. An introduction to using multidimensional item response theory to assess latent factor structures. J Soc Social Work Res 2010, 1:66-82.
32. Linacre JM. Investigating rating scale category utility. J Outcome Meas 1999, 3:103-122.
33. Baranowski T, Allen DD, Masse LC, Wilson M. Does participation in an intervention affect responses on self-report questionnaires?. Health Educ Res 2006, 21:i98-109. 10.1093/her/cyl087, 17060350.
34. Watson K, Baranowski T, Thompson D. Item response modeling: an evaluation of the children's fruit and vegetable self-efficacy questionnaire. Health Educ Res 2006, 21:i47-57. 10.1093/her/cyl136, 17077167.
35. Paek I. Investigation of differential item function: comparisons among approaches, and extension to multidimensional context [Doctoral Dissertation] 2002, Berkeley, CA: University of California.
36. Wilson M. Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach 2005, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Wu ML, Adams RJ, Wilson M, Haldane S. Conquest 2003, Berkeley, CA: ACER, [Computer Software].
38. Angoff WH. Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. Differential Item Functioning 1993, 3-24. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Holland PW, Wainer H.
39. Shepard LA. Definition of bias. Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias. 1982, 9-30. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, Berk RA.
40. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item Response Theory for Psychologists 2000, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
41. Reeve BB, Fayers P. Applying item response theory modeling for evaluating questionnaire items and scale properties. Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practices 2005, 55-73. New York: Oxford University Press, Fayers P, Hays R, 2.
42. Mantel N. Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: Extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. J Am Stat Assoc 1963, 58:690-700.
43. Shealy R, Stout W. A model-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika 1993, 58:159-194.
44. Shealy RT, Stout WF. An item response theory model for test bias. Differential Item Functioning 1993, 197-240. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Holland PW, Wainer H.