Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments

Journal of Hand Surgery

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 641-649

  Sorensen, Amelia A ^a   Howard, Daniel ^a   Tan, Wen Hui ^a   Ketchersid, Jeffrey ^a   Calfee, Ryan P ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

DASH; difference; minimal clinically important; PRWE

Indexed keywords

ARM DISEASE; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; DE QUERVAIN TENOSYNOVITIS; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM SHOULDER AND HAND; EPICONDYLITIS; FOLLOW UP; HAND; HAND DISEASE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NERVE COMPRESSION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT RATED WRIST EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; QUICKDASH; RADIAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; TENDINITIS; WRIST;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOREARM; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE COMPRESSION SYNDROMES; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TENDINOPATHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875530247     PISSN: 03635023     EISSN: 15316564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.032     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. R.P. Calfee, A.A. Adams Clinical research and patient-rated outcome measures in hand surgery J Hand Surg Am 37 4 2012 851 855
2. M.V. Smith, R.P. Calfee, K.M. Baumgarten, R.H. Brophy, R.W. Wright Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery J Bone Joint Surg Am 94 3 2012 277 285
3. R. Jaeschke, J. Singer, G.H. Guyatt Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference Control Clin Trials 10 4 1989 407 415
4. G.H. Guyatt, D. Osoba, A.W. Wu, K.W. Wyrwich, G.R. Norman Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures Mayo Clin Proc 77 4 2002 371 383
5. H.J. Schunemann, G.H. Guyatt Commentary-goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from? Health Serv Res 40 2 2005 593 597
6. E.F. Juniper, G.H. Guyatt, A. Willan, L.E. Griffith Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire J Clin Epidemiol 47 1 1994 81 87
7. F. Tubach, P. Ravaud, G. Baron Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement Ann Rheum Dis 64 1 2005 29 33
8. R.Z. Tashjian, J. Deloach, A. Green, C.A. Porucznik, A.P. Powell Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 2 2010 296 303
9. Institute for Work and Health, DASH Outcome Measure Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca Accessed January 9, 2013
10. Institute for Work and Health, DASH Outcome Measure QuickDASH Outcome Measures http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/system/files/quickdash-info-2010.pdf Accessed January 9, 2013
11. J.C. MacDermid The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) User Manual http://www.srs-mcmaster.ca/Portals/20/pdf/research-resources/ PRWE-PRWHEUserManual-Dec2007.pdf 2007 Accessed February 7, 2013
12. K.G. Calkins Andrews University. Applied Statistics - Lesson 5: Correlation Coefficients http://www.andrews.edu/∼calkins/math/edrm611/ edrm05.htm Accessed January 9, 2013.
13. J.S. Schmitt, R.P. Di Fabio Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria J Clin Epidemiol 57 10 2004 1008 1018
14. P.E. Mintken, P. Glynn, J.A. Cleland Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18 6 2009 920 926
15. K. Polson, D. Reid, P.J. McNair, P. Larmer Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened disability arm shoulder hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire Man Ther 15 4 2010 404 407
16. D. Osoba, M. King Interpreting QOL in individuals and groups: meaningful differences P. Fayers, R. Hays, Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice 2005 Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 243 257
17. R.D. Hays, S.S. Farivar, H. Liu Approaches and recommendations for estimating minimally important differences for health-related quality of life measures COPD 2 1 2005 63 67
18. M.T. King A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11 2 2011 171 184
19. S.A. Knox, M.T. King Validation and calibration of the SF-36 health transition question against an external criterion of clinical change in health status Qual Life Res 18 5 2009 637 645
20. G.R. Norman, P. Stratford, G. Regehr Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach J Clin Epidemiol 50 8 1997 869 879
21. D.E. Beaton, J.N. Katz, A.H. Fossel, J.G. Wright, V. Tarasuk, C. Bombardier Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity J Hand Ther 14 2 2001 128 146