Modelling and comparing cloud computing service level agreements

1st International Workshop on Model-Driven Engineering for High Performance and CLoud Computing, MDHPCL 2012 - Satellite Event of MODELS 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Alkandari, Fatima ^a   Paige, Richard F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cloud computing; model comparison; service level agreement

Indexed keywords

CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES; CLOUD CONSUMERS; CLOUD PROVIDERS; DOMAIN EXPERTS; META MODEL; MODEL COMPARISON; ON DEMANDS; SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS;

MODELS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

CLOUD COMPUTING;

EID: 84875513885     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2446224.2446227     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Amazon EC2. http://aws.amazon.com/releasenotes/Amazon-EC2/532.
2. Epsilon. http://www.eclipse.org/epsilon/.
3. GoGrid SLA. http://www.gogrid.com/legal/sla.php.
4. The NIST definition of cloud computing. http://csrc.nist.gov/ publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf.
5. Rackspace Service Level Agreement. http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/legal/ sla/.
6. Web Service Level Agreements (WSLA) Project. http://www.research.ibm.com/ wsla/.
7. Windows Azure SLA. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/sla/.
8. M. Alhamad, T. Dillon, and E. Chang. Conceptual sla framework for cloud computing. In Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), 2010 4th IEEE International Conference on, pages 606-610, april 2010.
9. A. Andrieux, K. Czajkowski, A. Dan, K. Keahey, H. Ludwig, J. Pruyne, J. Rofrano, S. Tuecke, and M. Xu. Web services agreement specification (ws-agreement). Global Grid Forum, 31:1-47, 2007.
10. C. Bartolini, M. Salle, and D. Trastour. It service management driven by business objectives an application to incident management. In Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2006. NOMS 2006. 10th IEEE/IFIP, pages 45-55, april 2006.
11. R. Buyya, C. S. Yeo, S. Venugopal, J. Broberg, and I. Brandic. Cloud computing and emerging it platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(6):599-616, 2009.
12. S. Garg, S. Versteeg, and R. Buyya. Smicloud: A framework for comparing and ranking cloud services. In Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on, pages 210-218, dec. 2011.
13. D. S. Kolovos. Establishing correspondences between models with the epsilon comparison language. In ECMDA-FA, pages 146-157, 2009.
14. A. Li, X. Yang, S. Kandula, and M. Zhang. Cloudcmp: comparing public cloud providers. In Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Internet measurement, IMC '10, pages 1-14, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
15. C. Raibulet and M. Massarelli. Managing non-functional aspects in soa through sla. In Database and Expert Systems Application, 2008. DEXA '08. 19th International Workshop on, pages 701-705, sept. 2008.
16. B. Rimal, E. Choi, and I. Lumb. A taxonomy and survey of cloud computing systems. In INC, IMS and IDC, 2009. NCM '09. Fifth International Joint Conference on, pages 44-51, aug. 2009.
17. A. Sahai, S. Graupner, V. Machiraju, and A. van Moorsel. Specifying and monitoring guarantees in commercial grids through sla. In Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2003. Proceedings. CCGrid 2003. 3rd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on, pages 292-299, may 2003.
18. L. M. Vaquero, L. Rodero-Merino, J. Caceres, and M. Lindner. A break in the clouds: towards a cloud definition. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 39:50-55, 2008.