AudioGene: Predicting Hearing Loss Genotypes from Phenotypes to Guide Genetic Screening

Human Mutation

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 539-545

  Taylor, Kyle R ^a,b   Deluca, Adam P ^a,b   Shearer, A Eliot ^c   Hildebrand, Michael S ^c   Black Ziegelbein, E Ann ^b   Anand, V Nikhil ^b   Sloan, Christina M ^c   Eppsteiner, Robert W ^c   Scheetz, Todd E ^a,b,c   Huygen, Patrick L M ^d   Smith, Richard J H ^b,c   Braun, Terry A ^a,b,c   Casavant, Thomas L ^a,b,c  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hearing loss; Machine learning; Next generation sequencing; Phenotype to genotype

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUDIOGENE; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDIOMETRY; AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT DISORDER; AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT NONSYNDROMIC HEARING LOSS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOTYPE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MACHINE LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; AUDIOMETRY; GENETIC TESTING; GENOTYPE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INTERNET; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84875493103     PISSN: 10597794     EISSN: 10981004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22268     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ahmed N, Natarajan T. 1974. Discrete cosine transform. IEEE Trans Comput 23:90-93.
2. Auer P. 1997. On learning from multi-instance examples: empirical evaluation of a theoretical approach. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, July 8-12, 2012. p 21-29.
3. Breiman L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine Learn 24:123-140.
4. Breiman L. 2001. Random forest. Machine Learn 45:5-32.
5. de Heer A-MR, Schraders M, Oostrik J, Hoefsloot L, Huygen PLM, Cremers CWRJ. 2011. Audioprofile-directed successful mutation analysis in a DFNA2/KCNQ4 (p.Leu274His) family. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120:243-248.
6. Eppsteiner RW, Shearer AE, Hildebrand MS, Taylor KR, Deluca AP, Scherer S, Huygen P, Scheetz TE, Braun TA, Casavant TL, Smith RJH. 2012. Using the phenome and genome to improve genetic diagnosis for deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:975-977.
7. Frank E, Hall M, Trigg L, Holmes G, Witten IH. 2004. Data mining in bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics 20:2479-2481.
8. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH. 2009. The WEKA data mining software. SIGKDD Explor Newslett 11:10-18.
9. Hildebrand MS, Deluca AP, Taylor KR, Hoskinson DP, Hur IA, Tack D, McMordie SJ, Huygen PLM, Casavant TL, Smith RJH. 2009. A contemporary review of AudioGene audioprofiling: a machine-based candidate gene prediction tool for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. Laryngoscope 119:2211-2215.
10. Hildebrand MS, Morín M, Meyer NC, Mayo F, Modamio-Hoybjor S, Mencía A, Olavarrieta L, Morales-Angulo C, Nishimura CJ, Workman H, Deluca AP, Del Castillo I, et al. 2011. DFNA8/12 caused by TECTA mutations is the most identified subtype of non-syndromic autosomal dominant hearing loss. Hum Mutat 32:825-834.
11. Hildebrand MS, Tack D, McMordie SJ, DeLuca A, Hur IA, Nishimura C, Huygen P, Casavant TL, Smith RJH. 2008. Audioprofile-directed screening identifies novel mutations in KCNQ4 causing hearing loss at the DFNA2 locus. Genet Med 10:797-804.
12. Hilgert N, Smith RJH, Van Camp G. 2009. Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics? Mutat Res 681:189-196.
13. Leonard D, Shen T, Howe H, Egler T. 1999. Trends in the prevalence of birth defects in Illinois and Chicago, 1989 to 1997. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Public Health.
14. Mohr PE, Feldman JJ, Dunbar JL, McConkey-Robbins A, Niparko JK, Rittenhouse RK, Skinner MW. 2000. The societal costs of severe to profound hearing loss in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:1120-1135.
15. Platt JC. 1998. Sequential minimal optimization: a fast algorithm for training support vector machines. Adv Kernel Methods Support Vector Learn 208:1-21.
16. Schmuziger N, Probst R, Smurzynski J. 2004. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones. Ear Hear 25:127-132.
17. Shearer AE, Deluca AP, Hildebrand MS, Taylor KR, Gurrola J, Scherer S, Scheetz TE, Smith RJH. 2010. Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:21104-21109.
18. Shearer AE, Hildebrand MS, Sloan CM, Smith RJH. 2011. Deafness in the genomics era. Hear Res 282:1-9.
19. Smith RJ, Bale JF Jr, White KR. 2005. Sensorineural hearing loss in children. Lancet 365:879-890.
20. Snoeckx RL, Huygen PLM, Feldmann D, Marlin S, Denoyelle F, Waligora J, Mueller-Malesinska M, Pollak A, Ploski R, Murgia A, Orzan E, Castorina P, et al. 2005. GJB2 mutations and degree of hearing loss: a multicenter study. Am J Hum Genet 77:945-957.
21. Stierman L. 1994. Birth defects in California: 1983-1990. California: California Department of Health Services.
22. Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TL, Homer CJ, Helfand M. 2001. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. JAMA 286:2000-2010.
23. Van Camp G, Smith RJH. 2012. The Hereditary Hearing Loss Homepage. Available at: http://hereditaryhearingloss.org/. Accessed October 2012.
24. Vapnik V. 1995. The nature of statistical learning. Springer, Vapnick, locations: New York, NY, USA.
25. White KR. 2003. The current status of EHDI programs in the United States. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 9:79-88.
26. White KR. 2004. Early hearing detection and intervention programs: opportunities for genetic services. Am J Med Genet A 130A:29-36.