Models, phases and cases of patient participation in decision-making in surgical treatment in Norway: A qualitative study

Nursing and Health Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 39-44

  Heggland, Liv Helen ^a   Mikkelsen, Aslaug ^b   Hausken, Kjell ^b  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Case study; Health care; Patient participation; Patient healthcare professional relationship; Surgical treatment

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE REPORT; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NORWAY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NEOPLASMS; NORWAY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84875490464     PISSN: 14410745     EISSN: 14422018     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00716.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the welfare of economics of medical care. Bull. World Health Organ. 2004; 82: 141-149.
2. Cahill J. Patient participation: a concept analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 1996; 24: 561-571.
3. Charles C, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc. Sci. Med. 1997; 44: 681-692.
4. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Br. Med. J. 1999; 319: 719-721.
5. Donald RM, Bryan KT. Patient advocacy in the USA: key communication role functions. Nurs. Health Sci. 2007; 9: 185-191.
6. Freidson E. Professionals Dominance. New York: Atherton, 1970.
7. Grund J. Sykehusledelse Og Helsepolitikk - Dilemmaenes Tyranni [Management in Hospital and Health Policy]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2006.
8. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision-making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2006; 15: 9-19.
9. Heggland LH, Hausken K. A qualitative identification of categories of patient participation in decision-making for surgical treatment. 2012: Clinical Nursing Research (in press).
10. Jespersen PK. Mellem Profession Og Management. [Between Professions and Management]. København: Handelshøjskolens Forlag, 2005.
11. McCann TV, Clark E, Baird J, Lu S. Mental health clinicians' attitudes about consumer and consumer consultant participation in Australia: a cross-sectional survey design. Nurs. Health Sci. 2008; 10: 78-84.
12. Petersson LM, Nordin K, Glimelius B, Brekkan E, Sjödèn PO, Berglund G. Differential effects of cancer rehabilitation depending on diagnosis and patients' cognitive coping style. Psychosom. Med. 2002; 64: 971-980.
13. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
14. Scott A, Vick S. Patients, doctors and contracts: an application of principal-agent theory to the doctor-patient relationship. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 1999; 46: 111-134.
15. Statistics Norway. Population's level of education. 2010. [Cited 23 Oct 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.ssb.no/utdanning_tema_en/utdanningsniv.shtml.
16. White R. Discourse analysis and social constructionism. Nurse Res. 2004; 12: 7-16.
17. WHO. Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care. 1978. [Cited 23 Oct 2012.] Available from URL: www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.