Economic growth and biomass energy

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 50, Issue , 2013, Pages 19-24

  Bildirici, Melike E ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

ARDL; Biomass energy consumption; Economic growth; Long run causality; Short run causality

Indexed keywords

ARDL; BIO-MASS ENERGY; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; LONG-RUN CAUSALITY; SHORT-RUN CAUSALITY;

BIOMASS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ERROR CORRECTION;

ECONOMICS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ALTERNATIVE FUEL; BIOMASS POWER; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ERROR ANALYSIS; FUEL CONSUMPTION;

ARGENTINA; BOLIVIA; COSTA RICA; CUBA; EL SALVADOR [CENTRAL AMERICA]; JAMAICA; NICARAGUA; PANAMA [CENTRAL AMERICA]; PARAGUAY; PERU;

EID: 84875486474     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.055     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. http://www.eria.org/research/images/pdf/PDF%2520No.6-3/No.6-3-4%2520Chap%25203%2520Bioamss.pdf.
2. Yemane Wolde R. Energy demand and economic growth: the African experience. Journal of Policy Modeling 2005, 27:891-903.
3. Toman T., Jemelkova B. Energy and economic development: an assessment of the state of knowledge. Energy Journal 2009, 24:93-112.
4. Domaca J., Richardsb K., Risovicc S. Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects. Biomass and Bioenergy 2005, 28:97-106.
5. Balat M., Balat H. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Appl Energy 2009, 86:2273-2282.
6. Mengjie W., Suzhen D. A potential renewable energy resource development and utilization of biomass energy 1994, FAO Corporate Document Repository, p. 9408.
7. Gan J., Smith C.T. Co-benefits of utilizing logging residues for bioenergy production: the case for East Texas, USA. Biomass and Bioenergy 2007, 31(9):623-630.
8. Schaffer W.A. Regional impact models. Economic impacts of woody biomass utilization for bioenergy in Mississippi 2008, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, 1999. http://www.fwrc.msstate.edu/pubs/10487.pdf, G. Perez-Verdin, D.L. Grebner, I.A. Munn, C. Sun, S.C. Grado (Eds.).
9. Hjerpe, EE. Economics of forest restoration and fuels reduction programs in the Southwest. Dissertation. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry; 2006.
10. Grebner D., Perez-Verdin G., Henderson J., Londo A.J. Bioenergy from woody biomass, potential for economic development and the need for extension. J Extension 2009, 47(6).
11. Rasche R.H., Tatom J.A. The effects of the new energy regime on economic capacity, production, and prices 1977, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2-12.
12. Kraft J., Kraft A. On the relationship between energy and GNP. J Energy Dev Spring 1978, 401-403.
13. Berndt E.R. The demand for electricity: comment and further results. MIT energy laboratory working paper 1978, MIT-EL78-021WP.
14. Akarca A.T., Long T.V. On the relationship between energy and GNP: a re-examination. J Energy Dev 1980, 5:326-331.
15. Proops J.L.R. Modelling the energy-output ratio. Energy Econ 1984, 6(1):47-51.
16. Yu E.S.H., Hwang B. The relationship between energy and GNP: further results. Energy Econ 1984, 6:186-190.
17. Yu S.H., Choi J.Y. The causal relationship between energy and GNP: an international comparison. J Energy Dev 1985, 10(2):249-272.
18. Erol U., Yu E.S.H. On the relationship between electricity and income for industrialized countries. J Electricity Emp 1987, 13:113-122.
19. Apergis, Payne J.E. The renewable energy consumption-growth nexus in Central America. Appl Energy 2011, 88:343-347.
20. Bildirici M.E. The relationship between economic growth and biomass energy consumption. JRSE 2012, 4(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3699617.
21. Nachane D.M., Nadkarni R.M., Karnik A.V. Cointegration and causality testing of the energy-GDP relationship: a cross-country study. Appl Econ 1988, 20:1511-1531.
22. Murray D.A., Nan G.D. A definition of the gross domestic product-electrification interrelationship. J Energy Dev 1996, 19:275-283.
23. Cheng B.S. Energy consumption and economic growth in Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela: a time series analysis. Appl Econ Lett 1997, 4:671-674.
24. Huang B.N., Hwang M.J., Yang C.W. Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: a dynamic panel data approach. Ecol Econ 2008, 67:41-54.
25. Chontanawat J., Hunt L.C., Pierse R. Causality between energy consumption and GDP: evidence from 30 OECD and 78 non-OECD countries. Surrey Energy Economics Discussion Paper Series 2006, vol. 113.
26. Chontanawat J., Hunt L.C., Pierse R. Does energy consumption cause economic growth? Evidence from a systematic study of over 100 countries. J Policy Model 2008, 30:209-220.
27. Squalli J. Electricity consumption and economic growth: bounds and causality analyses of OPEC countries. Energy Econ 2007, 29:1192-1205.
28. Apergis N., Payne J.E. Energy consumption and economic growth in Central America: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Econ 2009, 31:211-216.
29. Apergis N., Payne J.E. Energy consumption and growth in South America: evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Econ 2010, 32:1421-1426.
30. Seung-Hoon Y., So-Yoon K. Electricity consumption and economic growth in seven South American countries. Energy Pol 2010, 38:181-188.
31. Apergis N., Payne J.E., Menyah K., Rufael Y.W. On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth. Ecol Econ 2010, 69:2255-2260.
32. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 1987, 55:251-276.
33. Johansen S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dynamic Control 1988, 12:231-254.
34. Harris R. Using cointegration analysis in econometric modelling 1995, Prentice Hall, London, New York.
35. Rahbek A., Mosconi R. Cointegration rank inference with stationary regressors in VAR models. Econometrics J 1999, 2:76-91.
36. Huang B.N., Yang C.W. Long-run purchasing power parity revisited: a Monte Carlo simulation. Appl Econ 1996, 28(8):967-974.
37. Ahking F.W. Model mis-specification and Johansen's co-integration analysis: an application to the US money demand. J Macroeconomics 2002, 24:51-66.
38. Hjelm, Johansson M.W. A Monte Carlo study on the pitfalls in determining deterministic components in cointegrating models. J Macroeconomics 2005, 27:691-703.
39. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R.J. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J App Economet 2001, 16(3):289-326.
40. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R.J. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J App Economet 2001, 16(3):289-326.
41. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometrics and economic theory in the twentieth century: the Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. S. Strøm (Ed.).
42. Acaravci A. The causal relationship between electricity consumption and GDP in Turkey: evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Ekonomska istraŽivanja 2010, 23(2):34-43.
43. Dergiades T., Tsoulfidis L. Revisiting residential demand for electricity in Greece: new evidence from the ARDL approach to cointegration analysis. Empirical Econ 2011, 10.1007/s00181-010-0381-8.
44. Narayan P., Smyth R. The effect of inflation and real wages on productivity: new evidence from a panel of G7 countries. Appl Econ 2009, 41(10):1285-1291.
45. Ozturk I., Acaravci A. Electricity consumption and real GDP causality nexus: evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach for 11 MENA countries. Appl Energy 2011, 88(8):2885-2892.
46. Lee C.C., Chang C.P. Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: a more comprehensive analysis using panel data. Resour Energy Econ 2008, 30:50-65.