Network Connections That Evolve to Circumvent the Inverse Optics Problem

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Ng, Cherlyn ^a   Sundararajan, Janani ^a   Hogan, Michael ^a   Purves, Dale ^a,b,c  

^a DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; INHIBITORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; LIGHT ADAPTATION; LUMINANCE; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE STEADY POTENTIAL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CONDUCTION; PRESYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECEPTIVE FIELD; RETINA NERVE CELL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; HUMANS; LIGHT; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84875445617     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060490     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Purves D, Wojtach WT, Lotto RB, (2011) Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 15588-15595.
2. Stevens SS, (1966) Concerning the measurement of brightness. JOSA 56: 1135-1136.
3. Stevens SS (1975) Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural and social prospects. New York: Wiley.
4. Laming DRJ (1997) The measurement of sensation. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Gilchrist A (2006) Seeing black and white. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Attneave F, (1954) Some information aspects of visual perception. Psychol Rev 61: 183-193.
7. Barlow HB (1961) Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Sensory Communication. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
8. Laughlin SB, (1981) A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Z Naturforsch C 36: 910-912.
9. Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A, (1982) Predictive coding: A fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Lond B Biol Sci 216: 427-459.
10. Atick JJ, Redlich AN, (1992) What does the retina know about natural scenes? Neural Comput 4: 196-210.
11. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ, (1995) An information maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7: 1129-1159.
12. Olshausen BA, Field DJ, (1996) Emergence of simple cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381: 607-609.
13. Hateren JH, Schaaf A, (1998) Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lon 265: 359-366.
14. Brady N, Field DJ, (2000) Local contrast in natural images: normalization and coding efficiency. Perception 29: 1041-1055.
15. Schwartz O, Simoncelli EP, (2001) Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nat Neurosci 4: 819-825.
16. Mante V, Frazor RA, Bonin V, Geisler WS, Carandini M, (2005) Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system. Nat Neurosci 8: 1690-1697.
17. Graham DJ, Chandler DM, Field DJ (2006) Can the theory of whitening explain the center-surround properties of retinal ganglion cell receptive field? Vis Res 46: 2901-2913. Table 1.
18. Niven JE, Laughlin SB, (2008) Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. J Exp Biol 211: 1792-1804.
19. Nundy S, Purves D, (2002) A probabilistic explanation of brightness scaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 14482-14487.
20. Yang Z, Purves D, (2004) The statistical structure of natural light patterns determines perceived light intensity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 8745-8750.
21. Purves D, Lotto RB (2011) Why we see what we do redux. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
22. Palmer SE (1999) Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 31-33.
23. Augustine G, Charlton M, Smith S, (1985) Calcium entry and transmitter release at voltage-clamped nerve terminals of squid. J Physiol 367: 163-181.
24. Frazor RA, Geisler WS, (2006) Local luminance and contrast in natural images. Vis Res 46: 1585-1598.
25. Dror RO, Willsky AS, Adelson EH, (2004) Statistical characterization of real-world illumination. J Vis 4: 821-837.
26. Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA, (2001) Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 1193-1216.
27. Yang Z, Purves D, (2003) A statistical explanation of visual space. Nat Neurosci 6: 632-640.
28. Takasaki H, (1966) Lightness change of grays induced by change in reflectance of gray background. J Opt Soc Am A 56: 504.
29. Sakmann B, (1969) Creutzfeldt (1969) Scotopic and mesopic light adaption in the cat retina. Pflugers Arch 313: 168-185.
30. Daw NW (2006) Visual Development. New York: Springer.
31. Purves D, Lichtman JW (1985) Principles of neural development. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
32. Bekesy GV (1967) Sensory inhibition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
33. Cornsweet TN (1970) Visual perception. New York: Academic Press, New York.
34. Kuffler SW, (1953) Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol 16: 37-68.
35. Barlow HB, (1953) Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J Physiol 119: 69-88.
36. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
37. Eiben AE, Smith JE (2003) Introduction to evolutionary computing. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.