Denotation and connotation in public representation: Semantic network analysis of Hwang supporters' internet dialogues

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 335-350

  Kim, Leo ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

discourse; Hwang scandal; semantic network analysis; stem cell

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875439702     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662511401784     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barthes RElements of Semiology. New York: Jonathan Cape Ltd; 1967:.
2. Bauer M.Arenas, platforms and the biotechnology movement.Science Communication. 2002;24 (2): 144-161.
3. Qualitative Researching. Bauer MGaskell G, ed. London: SAGE; 2007:.
4. Bourdieu PLanguage and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991:.
5. Carley K.Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis.Sociological Methodology. 1993;23:75-126.
6. Carley K,Cicourel AV.The coder of narrative as expert: The ecological validity of coding practices. Paper presented at American Anthropological Association Conference; 1990; 1990.
7. Carley K,Kaufer D.Semantic connectivity: An approach for analyzing symbols in semantic networks.Communication Theory. 1993;3 (3): 183-213.
8. Carley K,Palmquist M.Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models.Social Forces. 1992;70 (3): 601-636.
9. After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Crossley NRoberts JM, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004:.
10. De Nooy W,Mrvar A,Batagelj VExploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
11. Franzosi R.Computer-assisted coding of textual data: An application to semantic grammars.Sociological Methods and Research. 1990;19 (2): 225-257.
12. Freeman C.Centrality in networks: Conceptual clarification.Social Networks. 1979;1:215-239.
13. Gottweiss H,Kim B.Bionationalism, stem cells, BSE, and Web 2.0 in South Korea: Toward the reconfiguration of biopolitics.New Genetics and Society. 2009;28 (3): 223-239.
14. Hellsten I,Dawson J,Leydesdorff L.Implicit media frames: Automated analysis of public debate on artificial sweeteners.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19 (5): 590-608.
15. Kang Y,Kim B,Han JSilence and Frenzy: Seven Years of Documents on the Hwang Affair. Seoul: Humanitas; 2006:.
16. Kim J.Public feeling for science: The Hwang affair and Hwang supporters.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;18 (6): 670-686.
17. Kim L.Explaining the Hwang scandal: National scientific culture and its global relevance.Science as Culture. 2008;17 (4): 397-415.
18. Kronberger N,Wagner WQualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. Bauer MGaskell G, ed. London: SAGE; 2007:.
19. Lacan JThe Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. London: Penguin Books; 1994:.
20. Leydesdorff LThe Knowledge-based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers; 2006:.
21. Luhmann NSocial Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1995:.
22. Moscovici SSocial Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2000:.
23. Park HW,Leydesdorff L.Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text.Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 2004;6 (5): 1377-1387.
24. Van Atteveldt W,Takens J.Automated and manual abstraction of populist rhetoric in political news coverage. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference; 2010Singapore; 2010.
25. Wasserman S,Faust KSocial Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994:.
26. Wittgenstein LPhilosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001:.
27. Fall of Myth, Phantom of National Interest. Won YJun GC, ed. Seoul: Hannarae; 2006:.
28. Wynne B.Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science.Public Understanding of Science. 1992;1:281-304.