Impact of blood rheology on wall shear stress in a model of the middle cerebral artery

Interface Focus

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Bernabeu, Miguel O ^a   Nash, Rupert W ^a   Groen, Derek ^a   Carver, Hywel B ^a   Hetherington, James ^a   Krüger, Timm ^a   Coveney, Peter V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blood flow modelling; Lattice Boltzmann; Multi scale modelling; Rheology; Three band diagram analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875435753     PISSN: 20428898     EISSN: 20428901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2012.0094     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rivero-Arias O, Gray A, Wolstenholme J. 2010 Burden of disease and costs of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) in the United Kingdom. Cost Effectiveness Resour. Allocation 8, 6. (doi:10.1186/1478-7547-8-6)
2. Stehbens WE. 1989 Etiology of intracranial berry aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 70, 823-831. (doi:10. 3171/jns.1989.70.6.0823)
3. Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita A, Kirino T. 2004 Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm. Stroke 35, 2500-2505. (doi:10.1161/01.STR. 0000144648.89172.0f)
4. Chatzizisis YS et al. 2008 Prediction of the localization of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress. Circulation 117, 993-1002. (doi:10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.107.695254)
5. Mejia J, Mongrain R, Bertrand OF. 2011 Accurate prediction of wall shear stress in a stented artery: Newtonian versus non-Newtonian models. J. Biomech. Eng. 133, 074501. (doi:10.1115/ 1.4004408)
6. Morbiducci U, Gallo D, Massai D, Ponzini R, Deriu MA, Antiga L, Redaelli A, Montevecchi FM. 2011 On the importance of blood rheology for bulk flow in hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation. J. Biomech. 44, 2427-2438. (doi:10.1016/j. jbiomech.2011.06.028)
7. Box FMA, van der Geest RJ, Rutten MCM, Reiber JHC. 2005 The influence of flow, vessel diameter, and non-Newtonian blood viscosity on the wall shear stress in a carotid bifurcation model for unsteady flow. Invest. Radiol. 40, 277-294. (doi:10. 1097/01.rli.0000160550.95547.22)
8. Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatrick D. 2004 Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. J. Biomech. 37, 709-720. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech. 2003.09.016)
9. Bernsdorf J, Wang D. 2009 Non-Newtonian blood flow simulation in cerebral aneurysms. Comput. Math. Appl. 58, 1024-1029. (doi:10.1016/j.camwa. 2009.02.019)
10. Cavazzuti M, Atherton MA, Collins MW, Barozzi GS. 2011 Non-Newtonian and flow pulsatility effects in simulation models of a stented intracranial aneurysm. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H J. Eng. Med. 225, 597-609. (doi:10.1177/09544119JEIM894)
11. Fisher C, Rossmann J. 2009 Effect of non-Newtonian behavior on hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. J. Biomech. Eng. 131, 091004. (doi:10.1115/ 1.3148470)
12. Xiang J, Tremmel M, Kolega J, Levy EI, Natarajan SK, Meng H. 2012 Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk. J. Neurointerventional Surg. 4, 351-357. (doi:10. 1136/neurintsurg-2011-010089)
13. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. 1985 Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 5, 293-302. (doi:10.1161/01.ATV.5.3.293)
14. Kallmes D. 2012 Point: CFD-computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 395-396. (doi:10.3174/ ajnr.A2993)
15. Cebral J, Meng H. 2012 Counterpoint: realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics-closing the gap. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 396-398. (doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2994)
16. Gizzi A, Bernaschi M, Bini D, Cherubini C, Filippi S, Melchionna S, Succi S. 2011 Three-band decomposition analysis of wall shear stress in pulsatile flows. Phys. Rev. E 83, 031902. (doi:10. 1103/PhysRevE.83.031902)
17. Mazzeo MD, Coveney PV. 2008 HemeLB: a high performance parallel lattice-Boltzmann code for large scale fluid flow in complex geometries. Comp. Phys. Commun. 178, 894-914. (doi:10.1016/j.cpc. 2008.02.013)
18. Mazzeo MD, Manos S, Coveney PV. 2010 In situ ray tracing and computational steering for interactive blood flow simulation. Comp. Phys. Commun. 181, 355-370. (doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.10.013)
19. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman D. 2008 An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp. 46, 1097-1112. (doi:10.1007/s11517-008-0420-1)
20. Chen S, Doolen G. 1998 Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 329-364. (doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.329)
21. Carver HB, Nash RW, Bernabeu MO, Hetherington J, Groen D, Krüger T, Coveney PV. 2012 Choice of boundary condition and collision operator for lattice-Boltzmann simulation of moderate Reynolds number flow in complex domains. (http://arxiv.org/ abs/1211.0205)
22. Boyd J, Buick JM, Green S. 2007 Analysis of the Casson and Carreau-Yasuda non-Newtonian blood models in steady and oscillatory flows using the lattice Boltzmann method. Phys. Fluids 19, 093103. (doi:10.1063/1.2772250)
23. Ashrafizaadeh M, Bakhshaei H. 2009 A comparison of non-Newtonian models for lattice Boltzmann blood flow simulations. Comput. Math. Appl. 58, 1045-1054. (doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2009. 02.021)
24. Mulder G, Bogaerds A, Rongen P, van de Vosse F. 2011 The influence of contrast agent injection on physiological flow in the circle of Willis. Med. Eng. Phys. 33, 195-203. (doi:10.1016/j.medengphy. 2010.09.021)
25. Manini S, Antiga L, Huberts W, Botti L, Remuzzi A. 2012 pyNS, an open source framework for 0D/1D hemodynamic modelling. In 10th Int. Symp. on Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. Berlin, Germany, 11-14 April 2012.
26. Huberts W, Bode A, Kroon W, Planken R, Tordoir J, van de Vosse F, Bosboom E. 2012 A pulse wave propagation model to support decision-making in vascular access planning in the clinic. Med. Eng. Phys. 34, 233-248. (doi:10.1016/j.medengphy. 2011.07.015)
27. Krüger T, Varnik F, Raabe D. 2009 Shear stress in lattice Boltzmann simulations. Phys. Rev. E 79, 046704. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.79. 046704)
28. Groen D, Hetherington J, Carver HB, Nash RW, Bernabeu MO, Coveney PV. 2012 Analyzing and modeling the performance of the HEMELB lattice-Boltzmann simulation environment. (http://arxiv. org/abs/1209.3972)
29. Henderson A. 2007 The ParaView guide: a parallel visualization application. Clifton Park, NY: Kitware Inc.
30. Groen D et al. 2013 Flexible composition and execution of high performance, high fidelity multiscale biomedical simulations. Interface Focus 3