Desynchronization attacks resilient image watermarking scheme based on global restoration and local embedding

Neurocomputing

Volumn 106, Issue , 2013, Pages 42-50

  Ji, Feng ^a   Deng, Cheng ^a   An, Lingling ^a   Huang, Dongyu ^b  

^a XIDIAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XI'AN UNIVERSITY OF ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Desynchronization attacks; Feature point; Image restoration; Robust watermarking; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

DE-SYNCHRONIZATION ATTACKS; FEA-TURE SELECTIONS; FEATURE POINT; FEATURE POINTS MATCHING; GEOMETRICAL TRANSFORM; ITERATION ALGORITHMS; ROBUST WATERMARKING; WATERMARKING SCHEMES;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER CRIME; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; RESTORATION; WATERMARKING;

IMAGE WATERMARKING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESYNCHRONIZATION ATTACK; FEATURE POINT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; IMAGE WATERMARKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOM SAMPLE CONSENSUS ITERATIVE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WATERMARK EMBEDDING;

EID: 84875399849     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.09.032     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. An L., Gao X., Yuan Y., et al. Content-adaptive reliable robust lossless data embedding. Neurocomputing 2012, 79(1):1-11.
2. O'Ruanaidh J.K., Pun T. Rotation, scale and translation invariant spread spectrum digital image watermarking. Signal Process. 1998, 66(3):303-317.
3. Simitopoulos D., Koutsonanos D.E., Strintzis M.G. Robust image watermarking based on generalized Radon transformation. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Tech. 2003, 13(8):732-745.
4. Pereira S., Pun T. Robust template matching for affine resistant image watermarks. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000, 9(6):1123-1129.
5. Bas P., Chassery J.M., Macq B. Geometrically invariant watermarking using feature points. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2002, 11(9):1014-1028.
6. Tang C.W., Hang H.M. A feature-based robust digital image watermarking scheme. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2003, 51(4):950-959.
7. Seo J.S., Yoo C.D. Local image watermarking based on feature points of scale-space representation. Pattern Recognition 2004, 37(7):1365-1375.
8. Deng C., Gao X., Li X., Tao D. A local Tchebichef moments-based robust image watermarking. Signal Process. 2009, 89(8):1531-1539.
9. Gao X., Deng C., Li X., Tao D. Geometric distortion insensitive image watermarking in affine covariant regions. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C Appl. Rev. 2010, 40(3):278-286.
10. Deng C., Gao X., Li X., Tao D. Local histogram based geometric invariant image watermarking. Signal Process. 2010, 90(12):3256-3264.
11. Wang X., Hou L., Wu J. A feature-based robust digital image watermarking against geometric attacks. Image Vis. Comput. 2008, 26(7):980-989.
12. Tsai J.-S., Huang W.-B., Kuo Y.-H., Horng M.-F. Joint robustness and security enhancement for feature-based image watermarking using invariant feature regions. Signal Process. 2012, 92(6):1431-1445.
13. Zheng D., Wang S., Zhao J. RST invariant watermarking algorithm with mathematical modeling and analysis of the watermarking processes. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2009, 18(5):1055-1068.
14. Bay H., Ess A., Tuytelaars T., Gool L.V. Speed-up robust feature (SURF). Comput. Vis. Image Understand. 2008, 110(3):346-359.
15. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2004, 60(2):91-110.
16. Fischler M.A., Bolles R.C. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Comm. ACM 1981, 24(6):381-395.
17. Felzenszwalb P.F., Huttenlocher D.P. Efficient graph-based image segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2004, 59(2):167-181.
18. Li L., Yuan X., Lu Z., Pan J.-S. Rotation invariant watermark embedding based on scale-adapted characteristic regions. Inform. Sci. 2010, 180(15):2875-2888.
19. Wang X., Wu J., Liu P. A new digital image watermarking algorithm resilient to desynchronization attacks. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forensics Secur. 2007, 2(4):655-663. Dec.
20. S.M. Elshoura, D.B. Megherbi, Comparison of Zernike and Tchebichef moments for image tampering detection sensitivity and watermark recovery, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference Technologies and Homeland Security, 2008, pp. 615-619.
21. Xin Y., Liao S., Pawlak M. Circularly orthogonal moments for geometrically robust image watermarking. Pattern Recognition 2007, 40(12):3740-3752.
22. Petitcolas F.A.P. Watermarking schemes evaluation. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2000, 17(5):58-64.
23. Gao X., Deng C., Li X., Tao D. Local feature based geometric-resistant image information hiding. Cogn. Comput. 2010, 2(2):68-77.
24. Ji R., Duan L., Cheng J., et al. Location discriminative vocabulary coding for mobile landmark search. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2012, 96(3):290-314.
25. Ji R., Yao H., Liu W., et al. Task-dependent visual-codebook compression. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012, 21(4):2282-2293.
26. Ji R., Yao H., Sun X. Actor-independent action search using spatiotemporal vocabulary with appearance hashing. Pattern Reognition 2011, 44(3):624-638.