Sex and gender reporting in health research: Why Canada should be a leader

Canadian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Johnson, Joy L ^a   Beaudet, Alain ^b  

^a CIHR Institute of Gender and Health   (Canada)

^b CANADIAN INSTITUTES OF HEALTH RESEARCH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Policy; Publishing; Research design; Sex

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875383799     PISSN: 00084263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03405660     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Krieger N. Genders, sexes, and health: What are the connections-and why does it matter? Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:652-57.
2. Putting gender on the agenda [Editorial]. Nature 2010;465:665.
3. Kim AM, Tingen CM, Woodruff TK. Sex bias in trials and treatment must end. Nature 2010;465:688-89.
4. Zucker I, Beery AK. Males still dominate animal studies. Nature 2010;465:690.
5. Wald C, Wu C. Of mice and women: The bias in animal models. Science 2010;327:1571-72.
6. Foulkes MA. After inclusion, information and inference: Reporting on clinical trials results after 15 years of monitoring inclusion of women. J Women's Health 2011;20:829-36.
7. Institute of Medicine. Sex-specific reporting of scientific research: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press, 2012.
8. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. Available at: http://www.ICMJE.org (Accessed May 3, 2012).
9. Doull M, Runnels VE, Tudiver S, Boscoe M. Appraising the evidence: Applying sex-and gender-based analysis (SGBA) to Cochrane systematic reviews on cardiovascular diseases. J Women's Health 2010;19:997-1003.
10. Berger JS, Roncaglioni MC, Avanzini F, Pangrazzi I, Tognoni G, Brown DL. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: A sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2006;295:306-13.