Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Yousofshahi, Mona ^a   Orshansky, Michael ^b   Lee, Kyongbum ^a   Hassoun, Soha ^a  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Chance constrained optimization; Enzyme activity modification; Flux capacity; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ENZYME;

ADIPOCYTE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CHO CELL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRICETULUS; HAMSTER; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; STATISTICS;

ADIPOCYTES; ANIMALS; CHO CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; ENZYMES; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875383513     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-7-29     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hamm A, Krott N, Breibach I, Blindt R, Bosserhoff A. Efficient transfection method for primary cells. Tissue Eng 2002, 8(2):235-245. 10.1089/107632702753725003, 12031113.
2. Florea B, Meaney C, Junginger H, Borchard G. Transfection efficiency and toxicity of polyethylenimine in differentiated Calu-3 and nondifferentiated COS-1 cell cultures. AAPS PharmSci 2002, 4(3):E12. 10.1208/ps040313, 2751351, 12423061.
3. Pharkya P, Maranas CD. An optimization framework for identifying reaction activation/inhibition or elimination candidates for overproduction in microbial systems. Metab Eng 2006, 8(1):1-13. 10.1016/j.ymben.2005.08.003, 16199194.
4. Burgard AP, Pharkya P, Maranas CD. Optknock, A bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003, 84(6):647-657. 10.1002/bit.10803, 14595777.
5. Lun DS, Rockwell G, Guido NJ, Baym M, Kelner JA, Berger B, Galagan JE, Church GM. Large-scale identification of genetic design strategies using local search. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5. http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v5/n1/full/msb200957.html.
6. Ahmed S, Shapiro A. Solving chance-constrained stochastic programs via sampling and integer programming. Tutorials in Operations Research 2008, 261-269. Anonymous INFORMS.
7. Charnes A, Cooper WW. Chance-constrained programming. Management Science 1959, 6(1):73-79.
8. Mani M, Orshansky M. A new statistical optimization algorithm for gate sizing. Computer Design, VLSI in Computers and Processors, 2004 ICCD 2004 Proceedings IEEE International Conference on 2004 2004, 272-277. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=1347933.
9. Zhu M, Taylor DB, Sarin SC, Kramer R. Chance Constrained Programming Models for Risk-Based Economic and Policy Analysis of Soil Conservation. Agric Resour Econ Rev 1994, 23(1).
10. Yeou-Koung Tung AM. Groundwater management by chance-constrained model. J Water Resour Plann Manage 1986, 112:1.
11. Ackooij W, Zorgati R, Henrion R, Möller A. Chance Constrained Programming and Its Applications to Energy Management, Stochastic Optimization. 2011, Anonymous InTech, http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/13877.pdf.
12. Maranas CD. Optimal molecular design under property prediction uncertainty. AIChE J 1997, 43(5):1250-1264.
13. Patil K, Rocha I, Forster J, Nielsen J. Evolutionary programming as a platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(1):308. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-308, 1327682, 16375763.
14. Hädicke O, Klamt S. CASOP, a computational approach for strain optimization aiming at high productivity. J Biotechnol 2010, 147(2):88-101. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.03.006, 20303369.
15. Melzer G, Esfandabadi M, Franco-Lara E, Wittmann C. Flux design, in silico design of cell factories based on correlation of pathway fluxes to desired properties. BMC Syst Biol 2009, 3(1):120. 10.1186/1752-0509-3-120, 2808316, 20035624.
16. Driouch H, Melzer G, Wittmann C. Integration of in vivo and in silico metabolic fluxes for improvement of recombinant protein production. Metab Eng 2012, 14(1):47-58. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.11.002, 22115737.
17. Liu B. Theory and Practice of Uncertain Programming 2009, Incorporated: Springer Publishing Company, 2.
18. Marcotte P, Savard G. Bilevel Programming, A Combinatorial Perspective 2005, 191-217. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F0-387-25592-3_7?LI=true.
19. Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G. Bilevel programming, A survey. 4OR, A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research 2005, 3(2):87-107.
20. Deng X, Xu J, Hui J, Wang C. Probability fold change, A robust computational approach for identifying differentially expressed gene lists. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009, 93(2):124-139. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.07.013, 18842321.
21. Wang HC, Ko YH, Mersmann HJ, Chen CL, Ding ST. The expression of genes related to adipocyte differentiation in pigs. J Anim Sci 2006, 84(5):1059-1066.
22. Kurata H, Zhao Q, Okuda R, Shimizu K. Integration of enzyme activities into metabolic flux distributions by elementary mode analysis. BMC Syst Biol 2007, 1(1):31. 10.1186/1752-0509-1-31, 1973080, 17640350.
23. Schuster S, Dandekar T, Fell DA. Detection of elementary flux modes in biochemical networks, a promising tool for pathway analysis and metabolic engineering. Trends Biotechnol 1999, 17(2):53-60. 10.1016/S0167-7799(98)01290-6, 10087604.
24. Varma A, Palsson BO. Metabolic flux balancing, basic concepts. Scientific and practical Use. Nat Biotech 1994, 12(10):994-998.
25. Nolan RP, Lee K. Dynamic model of CHO cell metabolism. Metab Eng 2011, 13(1):108-124. 10.1016/j.ymben.2010.09.003, 20933095.
26. Si Y, Yoon J, Lee K. Flux profile and modularity analysis of time-dependent metabolic changes of de novo adipocyte formation. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology And Metabolism 2007, 292(6):E1637-E1646. 10.1152/ajpendo.00670.2006, 17284573.
27. Si Y, Shi H, Lee K. Impact of perturbed pyruvate metabolism on adipocyte triglyceride accumulation. Metab Eng 2009, 11(6):382-390. 10.1016/j.ymben.2009.08.001, 2783285, 19683593.
28. Davies SL, James DC. Engineering Mammalian Cells for Recombinant Monoclonal Antibody Production. 2009, 6:153-173. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-90-481-2245-5_8?LI=true.
29. Lee MS, Kim KW, Kim YH, Lee GM. Proteome analysis of antibody-expressing CHO cells in response to hyperosmotic pressure. Biotechnol Prog 2003, 19(6):1734-1741. 10.1021/bp034093a, 14656149.
30. Fujimoto T, Ohsaki Y, Cheng J, Suzuki M, Shinohara Y. Lipid droplets, a classic organelle with new outfits. Histochemistry and Cell Biology 2008, 130(2):263-279. 10.1007/s00418-008-0449-0, 2491702, 18546013.
31. Terzer M, Stelling J. Large-scale computation of elementary flux modes with bit pattern trees. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(19):2229-2235. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn401, 18676417.
32. Han CY, Kargi AY, Omer M, Chan CK, Wabitsch M, O'Brien KD, Wight TN, Chait A. Differential effect of saturated and unsaturated free fatty acids on the generation of Monocyte adhesion and chemotactic factors by adipocytes. Diabetes 2010, 59(2):386-396. http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/59/2/386.long, 10.2337/db09-0925, 2809975, 19934003.
33. Conforti M, Cornuéjols G, Zambelli G. Polyhedral approaches to mixed integer linear programming 2010, 343-385. 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958-2008.
34. GLPK (GNU linear programming kit) http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk.
35. Deng X. Complexity issues in bilevel linear programming. Multilevel optimization, algorithms and applications 1998, 20:149-164.
36. Neuner A, Heinzle E. Mixed glucose and lactate uptake by Corynebacterium glutamicum through metabolic engineering. Biotechnology Journal 2011, 6(3):318-329. 10.1002/biot.201000307, 21370474.
37. Rocha M, Maia P, Mendes R, Pinto J, Ferreira E, Nielsen J, Patil K, Rocha I. Natural computation meta-heuristics for the in silico optimization of microbial strains. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(1):499. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-499, 2612012, 19038030.