Physical morbidity by surgical approach and tumor location in skull base surgery

Head and Neck

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 493-499

  De Almeida, John R ^a,b   Witterick, Ian J ^a   Gullane, Patrick J ^a   Gentili, Fred ^a   Lohfeld, Lynne ^b   Ringash, Jolie ^c   Thoma, Achilles ^b   Vescan, Allan D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

endoscopic; functional outcomes; physical morbidity; skull base surgery

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CHONDROSARCOMA; CHORDOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA; ENCEPHALOCELE; ENDOCRINE DISEASE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ESTHESIONEUROBLASTOMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HEMANGIOPERICYTOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYPOPHYSIS ADENOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENINGIOMA; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NASOPHARYNX CARCINOMA; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NOSE CAVITY; NOSE DISEASE; PARANASAL SINUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SELLA TURCICA; SEX RATIO; SKULL BASE TUMOR; SKULL SURGERY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURGICAL APPROACH; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADULT; AGED; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKULL BASE; SKULL BASE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84875382431     PISSN: 10433074     EISSN: 10970347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hed.23006     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, et al. Quality of life following surgery for anterior skull base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129: 1303-1309.
2. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Shabtai E, Khafif A, Fliss DM,. Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire. J Neurosurg 2004; 100: 813-819.
3. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Khafif A, Fliss DM,. Patient, caregiver, and surgeon perceptions of quality of life following anterior skull base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 1276-1281.
4. Fukuda K, Saeki N, Mine S, et al. Evaluation of outcome and QOL in patients with craniofacial resection for malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base. Neurol Res 2000; 22: 545-550.
5. Gil Z, Fliss DM,. Quality of life in patients with skull base tumors: current status and future challenges. Skull Base 2010; 20: 11-18.
6. Abraham A, Fliss DM, Margalit N, Gil Z,. A prospective evaluation of short-term health-related quality of life in patients undergoing anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20: 27-33.
7. Pant H, Bhatki AM, Snyderman CH, et al. Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20: 35-40.
8. de Almeida JR, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Carrau RL, Vescan AD,. Nasal morbidity following endoscopic skull base surgery: a prospective cohort study. Head Neck 2011; 33: 547-551.
9. Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Hosemann W, Strutz J,. Quality of life following surgery for malignancies of the anterior skull base. Skull Base 2007; 17: 119-123.
10. Cusimano MD,. Quality-of-life assessment in patients with lesions of the cranial base. Skull Base Surg 1999; 9: 259-264.
11. Karabatsou K, O'Kelly C, Ganna A, Dehdashti AR, Gentili F,. Outcomes and quality of life assessment in patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for pituitary adenomas. Br J Neurosurg 2008; 22: 630-635.
12. Shah JP,. Quality of life after skull base surgery: the patient's predicament. Skull Base 2010; 20: 3-4.
13. Jain AK, Gupta AK, Pathak A, Bhansali A, Bupuraj JR,. Excision of pituitary adenomas: randomized comparison of surgical modalities. Br J Neurosurg 2007; 21: 328-331.
14. Higgins TS, Courtemanche C, Karakla D, et al. Analysis of transnasal endoscopic versus transseptal microscopic approach for excision of pituitary tumors. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22: 649-652.
15. White DR, Sonnenburg RE, Ewend MG, Senior BA,. Safety of minimally invasive pituitary surgery (MIPS) compared with a traditional approach. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 1945-1948.
16. Dorward NL,. Endocrine outcomes in endoscopic pituitary surgery: a literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152: 1275-1279.
17. Carrabba G, Dehdashti AR, Gentili F,. Surgery for clival lesions: open resection versus expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25: E7.
18. Schaberg MR, Anand VK, Schwartz TH, Cobb W,. Microscopic versus endoscopic transnasal pituitary surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 18: 8-14.
19. Zhang Y, Want Z, Liu Y, et al. Endoscopic transsphenoidal treatment of pituitary adenomas. Neurol Res 2008; 30: 581-586.
20. Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F,. Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 1006-1015; discussion 1015-1017.
21. Montini P, Losa M, Barzaghi R, Boari N, Giovanelli M,. Results: of transsphenoidal surgery in a large series of patients with pituitary adenoma. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 1222-1233; discussion 1233.
22. Stamm AC, Vellutini E, Harvey RJ, Nogeira JF Jr, Herman DR,. Endoscopic transnasal craniotomy and the resection of craniopharyngioma. Laryngoscope 2008; 118: 1142-1148.
23. de Divitiis E, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Esposito F,. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for the removal of suprasellar tumors: part 2. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 46-58; discussion 58-59.
24. Laufer I, Anand VK, Schwartz TH,. Endoscopic, endonasal extended transsphenoidal, transplanum transtuberculum approach for resection of suprasellar lesions. J Neurosurg 2007; 106: 400-406.
25. Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F, et al. The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (1 Suppl 1): ONS75-ONS83; discussion ONS83.
26. Rudnick EF, DiNardo LJ,. Image-guided endoscopic endonasal resection of a recurrent craniopharyngioma. Am J Otolaryngol 2006; 27: 266-267.
27. Rudnick A, Zawadzki T, Wojtacha M, et al. Endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal treatment of pathology of the sellar region. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2005; 48: 101-107.
28. Jho HD, Carrau RL,. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg 1997; 87: 44-51.
29. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2002; 45: 193-200.
30. Zada G, Kelly DF, Cohan P, Wang C, Swedloff R,. Endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas and other sellar lesions: an assessment of efficacy, safety, and patient impressions. J Neurosurg 2003; 98: 350-358.
31. Chakrabarti I, Amar AP, Couldwell W, Weiss MH,. Long-term neurological, visual, and endocrine outcomes following transnasal resection of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 2005; 102: 650-657.
32. Dusick JR, Esposito F, Kelly DF, et al. The extended direct endonasal transsphenoidal approach for nonadenomatous suprasellar tumors. J Neurosurg 2005; 102: 832-841.
33. Laws ER, Kanter AS, Jane JA Jr, Dumont AS,. Extended transsphenoidal approach. J Neurosurg 2005; 102: 825-827; discussion 827-828.
34. Maira G, Anile C, Albanese A, Cabezas D, Pardi F, Vignati A,. The role of transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 2004; 100: 445-451.