Disocclusion-based 2D-3D registration for aortic interventions

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 312-322

  Demirci, Stefanie ^a   Baust, Maximilian ^a   Kutter, Oliver ^a   Manstad Hulaas, Frode ^b,c   Eckstein, Hans Henning ^d   Navab, Nassir ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

2D 3D registration; Disocclusion; Image dissimilarity; Medical image registration; Robust similarity measures

Indexed keywords

2-D-3-D REGISTRATION; DISOCCLUSION; IMAGE DISSIMILARITY; MEDICAL IMAGE REGISTRATION; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

ALGORITHMS; INTERPOLATION;

IMAGE REGISTRATION;

ALGORITHM; AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISOCCLUSION BASED 2D 3D REGISTRATION; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NOISE; OCCLUSION; PATIENT CODING; PHYSICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION ATTENUATION; REGISTRATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; AORTA; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; X-RAYS;

EID: 84875376219     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Goshtasby A.A. 2-D and 3-D Image Registration. For Medical, Remote Sensing, and Industrial Applications 2005, Wiley & Sons.
2. Groher M., Zikic D., Navab N. Deformable 2D-3D registration of vascular structures in a one view scenario. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2009, 28:847-860.
3. Tomaževič D., Likar B., Pernuš F. 3D/2D image registration. the impact of X-ray views and their number. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Part I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2007, vol. 4791:450-457. Springer.
4. Isselbacher E.M. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 2005, 111:816-828.
5. Eide K.R., Odegard A., Myhre H.O., Haraldseth O. Initial observations of endovascular aneurysm repair using dyna-CT. J. Endovasc. Ther. 2007, 14:65-68.
6. Penney G.P., Weese J., Little J.A., Desmedt P., Hill D.L.G., Hawkes D.J. A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1998, 17:586-595.
7. Figl M., Bloch C., Gendrin C., Weber C., Pawiro S.A., Hummel J., Markelj P., Pernuš F., Bergmann H., Birkfellner W. Efficient implementation of the rank correlation merit function for 2D/3D registration. Phys. Med. Biol. 2010, 55:N465-N471.
8. P. Markelj, D. Tomaževič, F. Pernuš, B. Likar, A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions, Med. Image Anal. (2010) Epub ahead of print.
9. Carrell T.W.G., Modarai B., Brown J.R.I., Penney G.P. Feasibility and limitations of an automated 2D-3D rigid image registration system for complex endovascular aortic procedures. J. Endovasc. Ther. 2010, 17:527-533.
10. Gendrin C.C., Markelj P.P., Pawiro S.A.S., Spoerk J.J., Bloch C.C., Weber C.C., Figl M.M., Bergmann H.H., Birkfellner W.W., Likar B.B., Pernus F.F. Validation for 2D/3D registration. II. the comparison of intensity- and gradient-based merit functions using a new gold standard data set. Med. Phys. 2011, 38:1491-1502.
11. Ruijters D., Robert Homa P.M., van de Haar P., Babic D. Validation of 3D multimodality roadmapping in interventional neuroradiology. Phys. Med. Biol. 2011, 56:5335-5354.
12. Nikou C., Heitz F., Armspach J.-P. Robust voxel similarity metrics for the registration of dissimilar single and multimodal images. Pattern Recognition 1999, 32:1351-1368.
13. Arya K.V., Gupta P., Kalra P.K., Mitra P. Image registration using robust m-estimators. Pattern Recognition Lett. 2007, 28:1957-1968.
14. D. Gerogiannis, C. Nikou, A. Likas, Robust image registration using mixtures of t-distributions, in: 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), (2007) pp. 1-8.
15. Kaneko S., Satoh Y., Igarashi S. Using selective correlation coefficient for robust image registration. Pattern Recognition 2003, 36:1165-1173.
16. Tomaževič D., Likar B., Pernuš F. 3-D/2-D registration by integrating 2-D information in 3-D. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2006, 25:17-27.
17. Markelj P., Tomaževič D., Pernuš F., Likar B. Robust gradient-based 3-D/2-D registration of CT and MR to X-ray images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2008, 27:1704-1714.
18. Brett M., Leff A.P., Rorden C., Ashburner J. Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. NeuroImage 2001, 14:486-500.
19. Andersen S.M., Rapcsak S.Z., Beeson P.M. Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions. still a necessity. NeuroImage 2010, 53:78-84.
20. Tauber Z., Li Z.-N., Drew M.S. Review and preview. disocclusion by inpainting for image-based rendering. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 2007, 37:527-540.
21. M. Bertalmio, G. Sapiro, V. Caselles, C. Ballester, Image inpainting, in: SIGGRAPH'00, ACM Press, 2000, pp. 417-424.
22. Bornemann F., März T. Fast image inpainting based on coherence transport. J. Math. Imag. Vis. 2007, 28:259-278.
23. L.M.G. Brown, T.E. Boult, Registration of planar film radiographs with computed tomography, in: Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, IEEE Computer Society, 1996, pp. 42-51.
24. Lemieux L., Jagoe R., Fish D.R., Kitchen N.D., Thomas D.G.T. A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. Med. Phys. 1994, 21:1749-1760.
25. Hartley R., Zisserman A. Multiple View Geometry 2003, Cambridge University Press. second edition.
26. Engel K., Hadwiger M., Kniss J.M., Rezk-Salama C., Weiskopf D. Real-Time Volume Graphics 2006, AK Peters Ltd.
27. Khamene A., Bloch P., Wein W., Svatos M., Sauer F. Automatic registration of portal images and volumetric CT for patient positioning in radiation therapy. Med. Image Anal. 2006, 10:96-112.
28. Rey W.J.J. Introduction to Robust and Quasi-robust Statistical Methods 1983, Springer.
29. S. Demirci, O. Kutter, F. Manstad-Hulaas, R. Bauernschmitt, N. Navab, Advanced 2D-3D registration for endovascular aortic interventions: addressing dissimilarity in images, in: M.I. Miga, K.R. Cleary (Eds.), SPIE Medical Imaging: Visualization, Imageguided Procedures, and Modeling. 6918, (2009) pp. 69182S-69190S.
30. Piegl L., Tiller W. The NURBS Book 1997, Springer.
31. Pérez P., Gangnet M., Blake A. Poisson image editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 2003, 22:313-318.
32. Demirci S., Bigdelou A., Wang L., Wachinger C., Baust M., Tibrewal R., Ghotbi R., Eckstein H.-H., Navab N. 3D stent recovery from one X-ray projection. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Part I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2011, vol. 6891:178-185. Springer.
33. Zikic D., Glocker B., Kutter O., Groher M., Komodakis N., Kamen A., Paragios N., Navab N. Linear intensity-based image registration by Markov random fields and discrete optimization. Med. Image Anal. 2010, 14:550-562.
34. van de Kraats E., Penney G., Tomaževič D., van Walsum T., Niessen W. Standardized evaluation methodology for 2-D-3-D registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2005, 24:1177-1189.
35. Besl P.J., McKay N.D. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1992, 14:239-256.
36. Liao R., Tan Y., Sundar H., Pfister M., Kamen A. An efficient graph-based deformable 2D/3D registration algorithm with applications for abdominal aortic aneurysm interventions. Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2010, vol. 6326:561-570. Springer.
37. Raheem A., Carrell T., Modarai B., Penney G. Non-rigid 2D-3D image registration for use in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Proceedings of Medical Image Understanding and Analysis 2010, 153-157. BMVA. A.H. Bhalera, N.M. Rajpoot (Eds.).