A dialogic conception of learning: collaborative peer coaching

International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 12-23

  Jewett, Pamela ^a   MacPhee, Deborah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coaching; Dialogue; Peer coaching; Peer mentoring; Teachers; United States of America

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875370712     PISSN: 20466854     EISSN: 20466862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/20466851211231594     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bean, R. (2004), “Promoting effective literacy instruction: the challenge for literacy coaches”, California Reader, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 58-63.
2. Casey, K. (2006), Literacy Coaching: The Essentials, Heinemann, Portsmouth.
3. Denzin, N. (1994), “The art and politics of interpretation”, in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, E. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 500-15.
4. Duncan, M. (2006), Literacy Coaching: Developing Effective Teachers Through Instructional Dialogue, Richard Owens Publishers, Katonah, NY.
5. Gee, J. (2000/2001), “Identity as an analytic lens for research in education”, in Secada, W. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Vol. 25, American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, pp. 99-126.
6. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967), Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publishers, Chicago, IL.
7. Giroux, H. (1988), Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning, Bergin & Gravey, Granby, Massachusetts, MA.
8. Hasbrouck, J. and Denton, C. (2007), “Student-focused coaching: a model for reading coaches”, The Reading Teacher, Vol. 60 No. 7, pp. 690-2.
9. Lave, J. (1996), “Teaching, as learning, in practice”, Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 149-64.
10. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Lewis, C., Enciso, P. and Moje, E. (2007), Reframing Sociocultural Research on Literacy: Identity, Agency, and Power, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
12. Mitchell, C. (1984), “Case studies”, in Ellen, R. (Ed.), Ethnography: A Guide to General Conduct, Academic Press, London, pp. 151-3.
13. Nystrand, M. and Gamoran, A. (1991), “Student engagement: when recitation becomes conversation”, in Waxman, H. and Walberg, H. (Eds), Effective Teaching: Current Research, McCutchen, Berkeley, CA, pp. 257-76.
14. Robb, L. (2000), Teaching Reading in Middle School: A Strategic Approach to Teaching Reading that Improves Comprehension and Thinking, Scholastic, New York, NY.
15. Rodgers, A. and Rodgers, E.M. (2007), The Effective Literacy Coach: Using Inquiry to Support Teaching and Learning, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
16. Toll, C. (2006), The Literacy Coach's Desk Reference: Processes and Perspectives for Effective Coaching, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
17. Wells, G. (1999), Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.