D0 → γγ and D0 → μ+μ- rates on an unlikely impact of the littlest Higgs model with T parity

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Paul, Ayan ^a   Bigi, Ikaros I ^a   Recksiegel, Stefan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875353556     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.094006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 211802 (2007).
2. M. Staric et al. (BELLE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 211803 (2007).
3. L. M. Zhang et al. (BELLE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 131803 (2007).
4. I. Bigi et al., J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2009) 097.
5. K. Blum et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 211802 (2009).
6. E. Ma and A. Pramudita, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2476 (1981).
7. T. Inami and C. Lim, Prog. Theor. Phys. 65, 297 (1981).
8. SD superscript from the expressions gives the general form to include all contributions.
9. S. Herrlich and J. Kalinowski, Nucl. Phys. B381, 501 (1992).
10. G.-L. Lin et al., Phys. Rev. D 42, 2314 (1990).
11. H. Simma and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B344, 283 (1990).
12. E. Vanem and J. Eeg, Phys. Rev. D 58, 114010 (1998).
13. C. Greub et al., Phys. Lett. B 382, 415 (1996).
14. G. Burdman et al., Phys. Rev. D 66, 014009 (2002).
15. S. Fajfer, P. Singer, and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 64, 074008 (2001).
16. G. Buchalla and A. Buras, Nucl. Phys. B400, 225 (1993).
17. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, and H. Georgi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4757 (2001).
18. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 513, 232 (2001).
19. M. Blanke et al., Phys. Lett. B 657, 81 (2007).
20. H.-C. Cheng and I. Low, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2003) 051.
21. H.-C. Cheng and I. Low, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2004) 061.
22. For a detailed description of the littlest Higgs model with T parity cf. [23].
23. J. Hubisz and P. Meade, Phys. Rev. D 71, 035016 (2005).
24. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, E. Katz, and A. E. Nelson, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2002) 034.
25. S. Coleman, J.Wess, and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 177, 2239 (1969).
26. C. G. Callan, S. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 177, 2247 (1969).
27. There are other ways of implementing T parity in the littlest Higgs model in which only linear representations of the entire group are used. They typically involve starting with a larger global symmetry and expanding the gauge group or expanding the Higgs sector as done in the minimal moose model [28].
28. I. Low, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2004) 067.
29. The QCD sector is strictly SM.
30. J. Hubisz, S. J. Lee, and G. Paz, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2006) 041.
31. M. Blanke et al., Phys. Lett. B 646, 253 (2007).
32. M. Blanke et al., J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2006) 003.
33. M. Blanke et al., J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2007) 082.
34. M. Blanke and A. Buras, Acta Phys. Pol. B 38, 2923 (2007).
35. A. Buras and C. Tarantino, arXiv:hep-ph/0702202v2.
36. M. Blanke et al., arXiv:0805.4393v2.
37. M. Blanke et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 41, 657 (2010).
38. M. Blanke et al., J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 066.
39. For the Feynman diagrams cf. [38].
40. T. Goto et al., Phys. Lett. B 670, 378 (2009).
41. F. del Aguila et al., J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 080.
42. E. Golowich et al., Phys. Rev. D 79, 114030 (2009).
43. C. T. Hill and R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 76, 115014 (2007).
44. D. Pappadopulo and A. Vichi, arXiv:1007.4807.
45. D. Krohn and I. Yavin, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2008) 092.
46. C. Cśaki, J. Heinonen, M. Perelstein, and C. Spethmann, Phys. Rev. D 79, 035014 (2009).
47. A. Freitas, P. Schwaller, and D. Wyler, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2009) 027.
48. C. T. Hill and R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 75, 115009 (2007).
49. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B 37, 95 (1971).
50. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B223, 422 (1983).