Trajectories of Multidimensional Neighbourhood Quality of Life Change

Urban Studies

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 923-941

  Delmelle, Elizabeth ^a   Thill, Jean Claude ^a   Furuseth, Owen ^a   Ludden, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; HETEROGENEITY; NEIGHBORHOOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL PROBLEM; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

CHARLOTTE; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84875327934     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012458003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Self-organising Maps: Applications in Geographic Information Science. Agarwal P.Skupin A., ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2008:.
2. Andrienko G.,Andrienko N.,Bremm S.,Schreck T., et al.Space-in-time and time-in-space self-organizing maps for exploring spatiotemporal patterns.Computer Graphics Forum. 2010a;29:913-922.
3. Andrienko G.,Andrienko N.,Demsar U.,Dransch D., et al.Space, time and visual analytics.International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2010b;24:1577-1600.
4. Brueckner J. K.,Rosenthal S. S.Gentrification and neighborhood housing cycles: will America's future downtowns be rich?.The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2009;91:725-743.
5. Burgess E.The City. Park R.Burgess E.McKenzie R., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1925:47-62.
6. Chow J.,Coulton C.Was there a social transformation of urban neighbourhoods in the 1980s? A decade of worsening social conditions in Cleveland, Ohio, USA.Urban Studies. 1998;35:1359-1375.
7. Cooke T.,Marchant S.The changing intrametropolitan location of high-poverty neighbourhoods in the US, 1990-2000.Urban Studies. 2006;43:1971-1989.
8. Ellen I. G.,O'Regan K.Reversal of fortunes? Lower-income urban neighbourhoods in the US in the 1990s.Urban Studies. 2008;45:845-869.
9. Galster G.,Cutsinger J.,Lim U.Are neighbourhoods self-stabilising? Exploring endogenous dynamics.Urban Studies. 2007;44:167-185.
10. Galster G.,Hayes C.,Johnson J.Identifying robust, parsimonious neighborhod indicators.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2005;24:265-280.
11. Galster G.,Quercia R.,Cortes A.Identifying neighborhood thresholds: an empirical exploration.Housing Policy Debate. 2000;11:701-732.
12. Galster G.,Quercia R.,Cortes A.,Rib M.The fortunes of poor neighborhoods.Urban Affairs Review. 2003;39:205-227.
13. Grigsby W.,Baratz M.,Galster G.,Maclennan D.The Dynamics of Neighborhood Change and Decline. Oxford: Pergamon; 1987:.
14. Guo D.,Chen J.,MacEachren A. M.,Liao K.A visualization system for space-time and multivariate patterns (VIS-STAMP).IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2006;12:1461-1474.
15. Guo D.,Gahegan M.,MacEachren A. M.,Zhou B.Multivariate analysis and geovisualization with an integrated geographic knowledge discovery approach.Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 2005;32:113-132.
16. Hanlon B.,Vicino T.,Short J. R.The new metropolitan reality in the US: rethinking the traditional model.Urban Studies. 2006;43:2129-2143.
17. Helburn N.Presidential address: geography and the quality of life.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1982;72:445-456.
18. Hoyt H.One Hundred Years of Land Values in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1933:.
19. Kauko T.A comparative perspective on urban spatial housing market structure: some more evidence of local sub-markets based on a neural network classification of Amsterdam.Urban Studies. 2004;41:2555-2579.
20. Kauko T.Classification of residential areas in the three largest Dutch cities using multidimensional data.Urban Studies. 2009a;46:1639-1663.
21. Kauko T.The housing market dynamics of two Budapest neighborhoods.Housing Studies. 2009b;24:587-610.
22. Kitchen P.,Williams A.Measuring neighborhood social change in Saskatoon, Canada: a geographic analysis.Urban Geography. 2009;30:261-288.
23. Kohonen T.The self-organizing map.Proceedings of the IEEE. 1990;78:1464-1480.
24. Lee S.Analyzing intra-metropolitan poverty differentiation: causes and consequences of poverty expansion to suburbs in the metropolitan Atlanta region.Annals of Regional Science. 2011;46:37-57.
25. Lee S.,Leigh N. G.Intrametropolitan spatial differentiation and decline of inner-ring suburbs: comparison of four U.S. metro areas.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2007;27:146-164.
26. Leven C. L.,Little J.,Nourse H.,Read R.New York: Praeger; 1976:.
27. Longley P. A.,Tobón C.Spatial dependence and heterogeneity in patterns of hardship: an intra-urban analysis.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2004;94:503-519.
28. Lucy W. H.,Phillips D. L.Washington, DC: Island Press; 2000:.
29. Madden J. F.The changing spatial concentration of income and poverty among suburbs of large US metropolitan areas.Urban Studies. 2003;40:481-503.
30. Massey D. S.,Denton N. A.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993:.
31. Charlotte neighborhood quality of life study, Charlotte. Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina at Charlotte; 2010:.
32. Morenoff J.,Tienda M.Underclass neighborhoods in temporal and ecological perspectives.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences. 1997;551:59-72.
33. Muth R.Cities and Housing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1969:.
34. Myers D.Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1998;54:347-358.
35. Pacione M.Quality-of-life research in urban geography.Urban Geography. 2003;24:314-339.
36. Pisati M.,Whelan C. T.,Lucchini M.,Maître B.Mapping patterns of multiple deprivation using self-organising maps: an application to EU-SILC data for Ireland.Social Science Research. 2010;39:405-418.
37. Randall J. E.,Morton P. H.Quality of life in Saskatoon 1991 and 1996: a geographical perspective.Urban Geography. 2003;24:691-722.
38. Rosenthal S. S.Old homes, externalities, and poor neighborhoods: a model of urban decline and renewal.Journal of Urban Economics. 2008;63:816-840.
39. Sampson R.,Morenoff J.,Gannon-Rowley T.Assessing 'neighborhood effects': social processes and new directions in research.Annual Review of Sociology. 2002;28:443-478.
40. Sawicki D. S.,Flynn P.Neighborhood indicators: a review of the literature and an assessment of conceptual and methodological issues.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1996;62:165-183.
41. Skupin A.,Agarwal P.Self-organising Maps: Applications in Geographic Information Science. Agarwal P.Skupin A., ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2008:1-20.
42. Skupin A.,Hagelman R.Visualizing demographic trajectories with self-organizing maps.GeoInformatica. 2005;9:159-179.
43. Smith H.,Furuseth O.Twenty-first Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America. Singer A.Hardwick S.Brettell C., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2008:281-307.
44. Smith S.Charlotte, NC: The Global Evolution of a New South City. Graves W.Smith H., ed. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press; 2010:189-219.
45. Spielman S. E.,Thill J.-C.Social area analysis, data mining, and GIS.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2008;32:110-122.
46. Suro R.,Singer A.Latino growth in metropolitan America: changing patterns, new locations. Washington, DC: Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution; 2002:.
47. Vesanto J.,Himberg J.,Alhoniemi E.,Parhankangas J.Self-organizing map in Matlab: the SOM toolbox. Paper presented at the Matlab DSP Conference; 1999Espoo, Finland; 1999.
48. Vesanto J.,Himberg J.,Alhoniemi E.,Parhankangas J.SOM toolbox for Matlab 5. Espoo, Finland: Neural Networks Research Centre; 2000:.
49. Vicino T. J.The spatial transformation of first-tier suburbs, 1970 to 2000: the case of metropolitan Baltimore.Housing Policy Debate. 2008;19:479-518.
50. Wilson W.The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1987:.
51. Yan J.,Thill J.-C.Visual data mining in spatial interaction analysis with self-organizing maps.Environment and Planning B. 2009;36:466-486.