A study on different stall delay models using a prescribed wake vortex scheme and nrel phase VI experiment

European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2007, EWEC 2007

Volumn 2, Issue , 2007, Pages 1154-1163

  Breton, Simon Philippe ^a   Coton, Frank N ^b   Moe, Geir ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS; BLADE-ELEMENT MOMENTUM METHODS; BOUND VORTICITIES; CORRECTION MODELS; CORRECTION SCHEMES; TANGENTIAL FORCE COEFFICIENT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW; WIND TUNNEL EXPERIMENT;

AERODYNAMIC STALLING; EXHIBITIONS; EXPERIMENTS; LIFT; VORTEX FLOW; WAKES; WIND POWER;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84875323453     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Hand MM, Simms DA, Fingersh LJ, Jager DW, Cotrell JR, Schreck S, Larwood, SM. Unsteady Aerodynamic Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns, NREL/TP-500-29955\ National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, 2001.
2. Benin JJ, Smith ML, Aerodymamics for Engineers,; Prentice-Hall Inc.: Upper Saddle River, USA, 1998; 266-267.
3. Robison DJ, Coton FN, Galbraith RAMcD, Vezza M. Application of a prescribed wake aerodynamic prediction scheme to horizontal axis wind turbine in axial flow. Wind Engineering 1995; 19:41-51.
4. Bertin, JJ, Smith ML, Aerodymamics for Engineers; Prentice-Hall Inc.: Upper Saddle River, USA, 1998; 103-104.
5. Bertin JJ, Smith ML, Aerodymamics for Engineers; Prentice-Hall Inc.: Upper Saddle River, USA, 1998; 294.
6. Coton FN, Wang T, Galbraith RAM, An Examination of Key Aerodynamic Modelling Issues Raised by the NREL Blind Comparison, Wind Energy 2002; 5:199-212.
7. Sheldahl RE, Klimas PC. Aerodynamic Characteristics of Seven Symmetrical Airfoil Sections through 180-degree Angle of Attack For Use in Aerodynamic Analysis of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Sandia Report. SAND80-2114 UC-261; Sandia National Laboratories: Albuquerque, USA, 1981.
8. Johansen J., Sørensen NN, Aerofoil Characteristics from 3D CFD Rotor Computations, Wind Energy 2004; 7:283-294.
9. Snel H, Houwink R. van Bussel GJW, Bruining A, Sectional Prediction of 3D Effects for Stalled Flow on Rotating Blades and Comparison with Measurements, Proc. European Community Wind Energy Conference: Lübeck-Travemunde Germany, 1993; 395-399.
10. Chaviaropoulos PK, Hansen MOL, Investigating Three-Dimensional and Rotational Effects on Wind Turbine Blade by Means of a Quasi-3D Navier Stokes Solver, J. Fluids Engineering 2000; 122:330-336.
11. Raj, NV, An Improved Semi-Empirical Model for 3-D Post-Stall Effects in Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines, Master of Science Thesis in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urhana, IL, Champaign: Urhana, 2000.
12. Du Z, Selig MS, A 3-D Stall-Delay Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Performance Prediction, AIAA-98-0021.
13. Bak C, Johanscn J, Andersen PB, Three-Dimensional Corrections of Airfoil Characteristics Based on Pressure Distributions, Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference: Athens, Greece, 2006.
14. Corrigan, JJ, Schilling JJ, Empirical Model for Stall Delay Due to Rotation, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialists Conference: San Francisco, CA, 1994.
15. Banks, WHH, Gadd GE. Delaying Effect of Rotation on Laminar Separation, AIAA Journal 1963; 1:941-942.
16. Tangier JL, Selig MS, An evaluation of an empirical model for stall delay due to rotation for HAWTs, Proceedings of Windpower '97: Austin, TX, 1997; 87-96.
17. Sørensen NN, Michelsen J A, Schreck S, Navier-Stokes Predictions of the NREL Phase VI Rotor in the NASA Ames 80 ftx 120 A Wind Tunnel, Wind Energy 2002; 5:151-169.
18. Lindenburg C, Investigation into Rotor Blade Aerody namics, ECN-C~03-025\ ECN: Pettcn, Netherlands. 2003.