Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement

BMC Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Husereau, Don ^a,b,c,o   Drummond, Michael ^d   Petrou, Stavros ^e   Carswell, Chris ^f   Moher, David ^g   Greenberg, Dan ^h,i   Augustovski, Federico ^j,k   Briggs, Andrew H ^l   Mauskopf, Josephine ^m   Loder, Elizabeth ^n,p  

^a INSTITUTE OF HEALTH ECONOMICS   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^f ADIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^g OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^h BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

ⁱ TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH POLICY   (Argentina)

^k UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^l UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^m RTI HEALTH SOLUTIONS   (United States)

ⁿ BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^o not available   (Canada)

^p BMJ   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84875315967     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-80     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance G, O'Brien J, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes 2005, New York: Oxford University Press, 3.
2. Drummond MF, Schwartz JS, Jönsson B, Luce BR, Neumann PJ, Siebert U. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008, 24:244-258.
3. Rennie D, Luft HS. Pharmacoeconomic analyses. JAMA 2000, 283:2158-2160. 10.1001/jama.283.16.2158, 10791510.
4. Neumann PJ, Stone PW, Chapman RH, Sandberg EA, Bell CM. The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses, 1976-1997. Ann Intern Med 2000, 132:964.
5. Rosen AB, Greenberg D, Stone PW, Olchanski NV, Neumann PJ. Quality of abstracts of papers reporting original cost-effectiveness analyses. Med Decis Making 2005, 25:424-428. 10.1177/0272989X05278932, 16061894.
6. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev 2012, 1:60. 10.1186/2046-4053-1-60, 3564748, 23194585.
7. Drummond MF. A reappraisal of economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Science or marketing?. Pharmacoeconomics 1998, 14:1-9.
8. McGhan WF, Al M, Doshi JA, Kamae I, Marx SE, Rindress D. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force report. Value Health 2009, 12:1086-1099. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x, 19744291.
9. Task Force on Principles for Economic Analysis of Health Care Technology Economic analysis of health care technology. A report on principles. Ann Intern Med 1995, 123:61-70. Task Force on Principles for Economic Analysis of Health Care Technology.
10. Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ 1996, 313:275-283. 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275, 2351717, 8704542.
11. Gold MR. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine 1996, New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses, Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996, 276:1339-1341. 10.1001/jama.1996.03540160061034, 8861994.
13. Nuijten MJ, Pronk MH, Brorens MJ, Hekster YA, Lockefeer JH, de Smet PA. Reporting format for economic evaluation: Part II: Focus on modelling studies. Pharmacoeconomics 1998, 14:259-268. 10.2165/00019053-199814030-00003, 10186465.
14. Vintzileos AM, Beazoglou T. Design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:1070-1076. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.021, 15507923.
15. Drummond M, Manca A, Sculpher M. Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005, 21:165-171.
16. Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, Brown R, Buxton M, Chawla A. Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report. Value Health 2005, 8:521-533. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00045.x, 16176491.
17. Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt RJ, Erickson LJ, Rindress D. Evidence and value: impact on decisionmaking-the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Serv Rev 2008, 8:270.
18. Davis JC, Robertson MC, Comans T, Scuffham PA. Guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluation of fall prevention strategies. Osteoporos Int 2010, 22:2449-2459.
19. Petrou S, Gray A. Economic evaluation using decision analytical modelling: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 2011, 342:d1766. 10.1136/bmj.d1766, 21482590.
20. Petrou S, Gray A. Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 2011, 342:d1548. 10.1136/bmj.d1548, 3230107, 21474510.
21. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-Explanation and elaboration: A report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force. Value Health 2013, 16:231-250.
22. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 2010, 7:e1000217. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217, 2821895, 20169112.
23. Moher D, Weeks L, Ocampo M. Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review. J Clin Epi 2011, 64:718-42.
24. Campbell SM, Hann M, Roland MO, Quayle JA, Shekelle PG. The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: results of a randomized controlled trial. Med Care 1999, 37:964-968. 10.1097/00005650-199909000-00012, 10493474.