Neuroimages in court: Less biasing than feared

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 99-101

  Roskies, Adina L ^a   Schweitzer, N J ^b   Saks, Michael J ^c  

^a Dartmouth College   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; LEGAL ASPECT; NEUROIMAGE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; NOTE; WITNESS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CRIMINAL LAW; FEAR; HUMANS; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCES;

EID: 84875276203     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.008     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Roskies A.L. Neuroimaging and inferential distance. Neuroethics 2008, 1:19-30.
2. Weisberg D.S. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:470-477.
3. McCabe D.P., Castel A.D. Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition 2008, 107:343-352.
4. Gurley J.R., Marcus D.K. The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses. Behav. Sci. Law 2008, 26:85-97.
5. McCabe D.P., et al. The influence of fMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision making. Behav. Sci. Law 2011, 577:566-577.
6. Compton S.E. Not guilty by reason of neuroimaging: the need for cautionary jury instructions for neuroscience evidence in criminal trials. Vanderbilt J. Entert. Technol. Law 2010, 12:333-354.
7. Pratt B. 'Soft' science in the courtroom?: The effects of admitting neuroimaging evidence into legal proceedings. Penn Bioeth. J. 2005, 1:1-3.
8. Vincent N.A. Neuroimaging and responsibility assessments. Neuroethics 2011, 4:35-49.
9. Schweitzer N.J., et al. Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: no impact. Psychol. Public Pol. Law 2011, 17:357-393.
10. Schweitzer N.J., Saks M.J. Neuroimage Evidence and the Insanity Defense. Behav. Sci. Law 2011, 29:592-607.
11. Farah M.J., Hook C.J. The seductive allure of 'seductive allure'. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 8:88-90.
12. Gruber D., Dickerson J.A. Persuasive images in popular science: Testing judgments of scientific reasoning and credibility. Pub. Underst. Sci. 2012, 2:938-948.
13. Greene E., Cahill B. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making. Behav. Sci. Law 2011, 30:280-296.
14. Morse S.J. Determinism and the death of folk psychology: two challenges to responsibility from neuroscience. Minn. J. Law Sci. Technol. 2008, 9:1-36.
15. Morse S.J. Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: a diagnostic note. Ohio State J. Crim. Law 2005, 3:397.