Health claim regulation of probiotics in the USA and the EU: Is there a middle way?

Beneficial Microbes

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 109-115

  Hoffmann, D E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

Health claims; Law; Regulation

Indexed keywords

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DRUG APPROVAL; DRUG CONTROL; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG MARKETING; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; PRODUCT SAFETY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84875274575     PISSN: 18762883     EISSN: 18762891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3920/BM2012.0033     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aerni, P., 2006. The impact of diverging transatlantic GMO regulations on the management of natural resources in developing countries. Center for Comparative and International Studies Working Paper No. 10. ETH Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. Available at: http://www.cis.ethz.ch/publications/WP_10_Aerni.pdf.
2. André, C. and Velasquez, M., 1991. Who should pay? The product liability debate. Issues in Ethics Vol. 4. Available at: http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v4n1/pay.html.
3. Arvanitoyannis, I.S. and Van Houwelingen-Koukaliaroglou, M., 2005. Functional foods: a survey of health claims, pros and cons, and current legislation. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 45: 385-404.
4. Bayer, R. and Kelly, M., 2010. Tobacco control and free speech - an American dilemma. New England Journal of Medicine 362: 281-283.
5. Bermann, G.A., Koch Jr., C.H. and O'Reilly, J.T. (eds.), 2008. Administrative law of the European Union: introduction. ABA Publishing, Chicago, IL, USA.
6. European Commission (EC), 2000. Press release. Commission adopts communication on precautionary principle. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/00/96&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
7. European Commission (EC), 2005. Europeans, science, and technology. EU Directorate General Press. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_224_report_en.pdf.
8. European Commission (EC), 2002. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. Official Journal of the European Union L31: 1-24.
9. Gassy-Wright, O.V., 2005. Commercial speech in the United States and Europe. LLM Thesis. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/stu_llm/13.
10. Gerdes, S., 2006. The dairy/probiotics relationship. Dairy Foods 107: 54.
11. Marks, J.H., 2011. On regularity and regulation, health claims and hype. Hastings Center Report 41(4): 11-12. Available at: http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Publications/HCR/Detail.aspx?id=5421.
12. Patterson, L.A. and Josling, T., 2002. Regulating biotechnology: comparing EU and US approaches. European Policy Papers No. 8. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/28/.
13. Reid, G., Jass, J., Sebulsky, M.T. and McCormick, J.K., 2003. Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 16: 658-672.
14. Satine, L.A., 2008. Is my yogurt lying? Developing and applying a framework for determining whether wellness claims on probiotic yogurts mislead. Food and Drug Law Journal 63: 537-537.
15. Strauss, P.L., Smith Jr., T.T. and Bergkamp, L., 2008. Rulemaking. Administrative Law of the European Union, Vol. 3. ABA Publishing, Chicago, IL, USA.
16. US Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 2000. Final rule: regulations on statements made for dietary supplements concerning the effect of the product on the structure or function of the body. Federal Register 65: 999. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/DietarySupplements/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/RegulationsLaws/ucm107387.htm.
17. US Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 2005. Qualified health claims - summary of qualified health claims subject to enforcement discretion. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/LabelClaims/QualifiedHealthClaims/ucm073992.htm#chromium.
18. US Court of Appeals, 1999. Pearson v. Shalala, 164 F.3d 650 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
19. US Federal Trade Commission, 2011. News Release. FTC approves final order settling charges that Nestlé subsidiary made deceptive health claims for BOOST kid essentials. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/01/nestle.shtm.
20. US Federal Trade Commission, 2010. News Release. Danone agrees to drop exaggerated health claims for Activia yogurt and DanActive dairy drink. Available at: http://ftc.gov/opa/2010/12/dannon.shtm.
21. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2011. Food labeling: nutrition labeling of standard menu items in restaurants and similar retail food establishments: notice of proposed rulemaking: preliminary regulatory impact analysis. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/LabelingNutrition/UCM249276.pdf.
22. US Government Accountability Office, 2011. FDA needs to reassess its approach to protecting consumers from false or misleading claims. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/assets/320/314473.pdf.
23. US Supreme Court, 2001. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001).
24. Van Loveren, H., Sanz, Y. and Salminen, S., 2012. Health claims in Europe: probiotics and prebiotics as case examples. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology 3: 247-261.