Cognitive enhancement, rational choice and justification

Neuroethics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 179-187

  Dubljević, Veljko ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive enhancement; Justification; Neuroethics; Prisoners' Dilemma; Public policy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COGNITION; COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; POLICY; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL PROBLEM; TAX;

EID: 84875273003     PISSN: 18745490     EISSN: 18745504     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-012-9173-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Racine, Eric. 2010. Pragmatic neuroethics: Improving treatment and understanding of the mind-brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Gazzaniga, Michael S. 2005. The ethical brain. New York: Dana Press.
3. Greely, Henry, Barbara Sahakian, John Harris, Ronald C. Kessler, Michael Gazzaniga, Philip Campbell, and Martha J. Farah. 2008. Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature 456(7223): 702-705.
4. Appel, Jacob M. 2008. When the boss turns pusher: A proposal for employee protections in the age of cosmetic neurology. Journal of Medical Ethics 34(8): 616-618.
5. Capps, Benjamin. 2011. Libertarianism, legitimation, and the problems of regulating cognition-enhancing drugs. Neuroethics 4(2): 119-128.
6. Glannon, Walter. 2008. Psychopharmacological enhancement. Neuroethics 1(1): 45-54.
7. Glannon, Walter. 2011. Brain, body and mind: Neuroethics with a human face. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Lieb, Klaus. 2010. Hirndoping: Warum wir nicht alles schlucken sollten. Mannheim: Artemis & Winkler.
9. Dubljevic, Veljko. 2012. Principles of justice as the basis for public policy on psycho-pharmacological cognitive enhancement. Law, Innovation and Technology 4(1): 67-83.
10. Dubljevic, Veljko. 2012. Toward a legitimate public policy on cognition-enhancement drugs. American Journal of Bioethics - Neuroscience 3(3): 29-33.
11. Maher, Brendan. 2008. Poll results: Look who's doping. Nature 452(7188): 674-675.
12. DeSantis, Alan D., Elisabeth M. Webb, and Seth M. Noar. 2008. Illicit use of prescription ADHD medications on a college campus: A multimethodological approach. Journal of American College Health 57(3): 315-324.
13. Khushf, George. 2005. The use of emergent technologies for enhancing human performance: Are we prepared to address the ethical and policy issues? Public Policy and Practice 4(2): 1-17.
14. Khushf, George. 2008. The second stage enhancements. In Emerging conceptual, ethical and policy issues in bionanotechnology, ed. Fabrice Jotterand, 203-218. Dodrecht: Springer.
15. Schuijff, Mirjam. 2009. STOA: Human Enhancement Study. The Hague: Rathenau Institute.
16. Academy of Medical Sciences. 2012. Human Enhancement and the Future of Work. Joint report of the Academy of Medical Sciences, the British Academy, the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Royal Society http://royalsociety.org/ uploadedFiles/Royal-Society-Content/policy/projects/human-enhancement/ 2012-11-06-Human-enhancement.pdf Accessed 10. November 2012
17. C.Ian Ragan, Imre Bard, and Ilina Singh. 2012. What should we do about student use of cognitive enhancers? An analysis of current evidence. Neuropharmacology 64: 588-595.
18. English, Veronica. 2007. Boosting your brainpower: ethical aspects of cognitive enhancements. A discussion paper from the British Medical Association. London: British Medical Association.
19. Institut für Gesundheits- und Sozialforschung. 2009. Gesundheitsreport 2009. Analyse der Arbeitsunfähigkeitsdaten. Schwerpunktthema Doping am Arbeitsplatz. Hamburg: DAK.
20. Euromonitor. 2011. Tobacco in Norway. Euromonitor International Market Research Report. http://www.euromonitor.com/tobacco-in-norway/report. Accessed 15 August 2012.
21. Staatsblad. 2002. Opium Act. Cannabis Bureau archive. http://www.cannabisbureau.nl/en/doc/pdf/Dutch%20Opium-Act-30556.pdf. Accessed 15 August 2012.
22. De Greiff, Pablo (ed.). 1999. Drugs and the limits of liberalism. New York: Cornell University Press.
23. Husak, Douglas. 2005. For drug legalization. In The legalization of drugs: For and against, ed. Douglas Husak and Peter De Marneffe, 3-108. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25. Rawls, John. 2005. Political liberalism, expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
26. Daniels, Norman. 2008. Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Gert, Bernard, Charles M. Culver, and K.Danner Clouser. 2006. Bioethics - A systematic approach, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
29. Miller, David. 1999. Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
30. Gaus, Gerald. 2011. The order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Habermas, Jürgen. 2005. The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.