Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of the kidney: Alterations in diffusion and perfusion in patients with renal dysfunction

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 414-417

  Ichikawa, Shintaro ^a   Motosugi, Utaroh ^a   Ichikawa, Tomoaki ^a   Sano, Katsuhiro ^a   Morisaka, Hiroyuki ^a   Araki, Tsutomu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI); Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM); Kidney; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION IMAGING; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION; KIDNEY MEDULLA; KIDNEY PERFUSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KIDNEY DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RENAL CIRCULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875271266     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Notohamiprodjo M., Pedersen M., Glaser C., Helck A.D., Lodemann K.P., Jespersen B., et al. Comparison of Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA for studying renal perfusion and filtration. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 34(3):595-607.
2. Lemoine S., Papillard M., Belloi A., Rognant N., Fouque D., Laville M., et al. Renal perfusion: noninvasive measurement with multidetector CT versus fluorescent microspheres in a pig model. Radiology 2011, 260(2):414-420.
3. Aburano T., Shuke N., Yokoyama K., Matsuda H., Takayama T., Michigishi T., et al. Renal perfusion with Tc-99 m DTPA - simple noninvasive determination of extraction fraction and plasma flow. Clin Nucl Med 1993, 18(7):573-577.
4. Artz N.S., Sadowski E.A., Wentland A.L., Djamali A., Grist T.M., Seo S., et al. Reproducibility of renal perfusion MR imaging in native and transplanted kidneys using non-contrast arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 33(6):1414-1421.
5. Winter J.D., St Lawrence K.S., Margaret Cheng H.L. Quantification of renal perfusion: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 34(3):608-615.
6. Lanzman R.S., Wittsack H.J., Martirosian P., Zgoura P., Bilk P., Kropil P., et al. Quantification of renal allograft perfusion using arterial spin labeling MRI: initial results. Eur Radiol 2010, 20(6):1485-1491.
7. Le Bihan D., Breton E., Lallemand D., Grenier P., Cabanis E., Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986, 161(2):401-407.
8. Le Bihan D. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. Radiology 2008, 249(3):748-752.
9. Patel J., Sigmund E.E., Rusinek H., Oei M., Babb J.S., Taouli B. Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 31(3):589-600.
10. Lemke A., Laun F.B., Klauss M., Re T.J., Simon D., Delorme S., et al. Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters. Invest Radiol 2009, 44(12):769-775.
11. Luciani A., Vignaud A., Cavet M., Nhieu J.T., Mallat A., Ruel L., et al. Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging - pilot study. Radiology 2008, 249(3):891-899.
12. Chandarana H., Lee V.S., Hecht E., Taouli B., Sigmund E.E. Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol 2011, 46(5):285-291.
13. Thoeny H.C., De Keyzer F., Oyen R.H., Peeters R.R. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in healthy volunteers and patients with parenchymal diseases: initial experience. Radiology 2005, 235(3):911-917.
14. Taouli B., Thakur R.K., Mannelli L., Babb J.S., Kim S., Hecht E.M., et al. Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2009, 251(2):398-407.
15. Xu Y., Wang X., Jiang X. Relationship between the renal apparent diffusion coefficient and glomerular filtration rate: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26(3):678-681.
16. Artunc F., Rossi C., Boss A. MRI to assess renal structure and function. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2011, 20(6):669-675.
17. Grenier N., Basseau F., Ries M., Tyndal B., Jones R., Moonen C. Functional MRI of the kidney. Abdom Imaging 2003, 28(2):164-175.
18. Huang A.J., Lee V.S., Rusinek H. MR imaging of renal function. Radiol Clin North Am 2003, 41(5):1001-1017.
19. Itoh K. 99mTc-MAG3: review of pharmacokinetics, clinical application to renal diseases and quantification of renal function. Ann Nucl Med 2001, 15(3):179-190.
20. Thoeny H.C., Grenier N. Science to practice: can diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings be used as biomarkers to monitor the progression of renal fibrosis?. Radiology 2010, 255(3):667-668.
21. Wittsack H.J., Lanzman R.S., Mathys C., Janssen H., Modder U., Blondin D. Statistical evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging of the human kidney. Magn Reson Med 2010, 64(2):616-622.
22. Zhang J.L., Sigmund E.E., Chandarana H., Rusinek H., Chen Q., Vivier P.H., et al. Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification. Radiology 2010, 254(3):783-792.
23. Levey A.S., Coresh J., Greene T., Stevens L.A., Zhang Y.L., Hendriksen S., et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2006, 145(4):247-254.
24. Matsuo S., Imai E., Horio M., Yasuda Y., Tomita K., Nitta K., et al. On behalf of the collaborators developing the Japanese equation for estimated GFR: Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 2009, 53(6):982-992.
25. Stevens L.A., Coresh J., Schmid C.H., Feldman H.I., Froissart M., Kusek J., et al. Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2008, 51(3):395-406.
26. Le Bihan D., Breton E., Lallemand D., Aubin M.L., Vignaud J., Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988, 168(2):497-505.
27. Muller M.F., Prasad P.V., Edelman R.R. Can the IVIM model be used for renal perfusion imaging?. Eur J Radiol 1998, 26(3):297-303.
28. Thoeny H.C., De Keyzer F. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of native and transplanted kidneys. Radiology 2011, 259(1):25-38.
29. Thoeny H.C., Zumstein D., Simon-Zoula S., Eisenberger U., De Keyzer F., Hofmann L., et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2006, 241(3):812-821.
30. Wirestam R., Borg M., Brockstedt S., Lindgren A., Holtas S., Stahlberg F. Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique. Acta Radiol 2001, 42(2):123-128.
31. Heuper K., Gutberlet M., Rodt T., Gwinner W., Lehner F., Wacker F., et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography for assesment of renal allograft dysfunction-initial results. Eur Radiol 2011, 21(11):2427-2433.