Influence of geometrical parameters of honeycomb commercial SCR-DeNOx-catalysts on DeNOx-activity, mercury oxidation and SO2/SO3-conversion

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 222, Issue , 2013, Pages 274-281

  Schwammle T ^a   Bertsche, F ^a   Hartung, A ^b   Brandenstein, J ^c   Heidel, B ^a   Scheffknecht, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b IBIDEN Porzellanfabrik Frauenthal GmbH   (Austria)

^c EON Kernkraft GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

DeNOx activity; Mercury oxidation; SCR DeNOx catalysts; SO2 SO3 conversion

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL BLOCKING; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; DENOX-ACTIVITY; FAST REACTION KINETICS; MASS TRANSFER LIMITATION; MERCURY OXIDATIONS; SCR-DENOX-CATALYSTS; SYSTEMATIC STUDY;

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; FLUE GASES; HONEYCOMB STRUCTURES; MERCURY (METAL); OXIDATION; REACTION KINETICS; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

CATALYST ACTIVITY;

EID: 84875257891     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.057     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. IEA Statistics: Electricity Information 2012, International Energy Agency, 2012.
2. Schrod M., Semel J., Steiner R. Verfahren zur Minderung von NOx-Emissionen in Rauchgasen. Chem. Ing. Tech. 1985, 57(9):717-727.
3. Bosch H., Janssen F. Catal. Today 1988, 2:369-531.
4. Forzatti P. Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysts. Appl. Catal. A: General 2001, 222:221-236.
5. I. Nova, A. Beretta, G. Groppi, L. Lietti, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Monolithic Catalysts for NOx Removal from Stationary Sources, in: A. Cybolski, J. Moulijn (Eds.), Structured Catalysts and Reactors, CRC Taylor & Francis, 2006, pp. 171-210.
6. 3 De-NOx catalysts: relevance of the vanadium-tungsten interaction on the catalytic activity. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35:3884-3892.
7. 2 catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Appl. Catal. A: General 1992, 80:135-148.
8. Scheffknecht G., Farr S., Heidel B., Schwämmle T., Brechtel K. Quecksilber aus thermischen Kraftwerken: Freisetzungs- und Umwandlungsmechanismen sowie Möglichkeiten zur Minderung. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2012, 84:1041-1051.
9. Hocquel M. The behaviour and fate of mercury in coal-fired power plants with downstream air pollution control devices 2004, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.
10. Martel C. Brennstoff- und lastspezifische Untersuchungen von Schwermetallen in Kohlestaubfeuerung 2000, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.
11. Gutberlet H., Spiesberger A., Kastner F., Tembrink J. Zum Verhalten des Spurenelementes Quecksilber in Steinkohlefeuerungen mit Rauchgasreinigungsanlagen. VGB Kraftwerkstechnik 1992, 72:636-641.
12. D. Laudal, Effect of SCR on Mercury, 2002 Field Studies Update, UNDEERC, Final Report, 2003.
13. Niksa S., Fujiwara N. A predictive mechanism for mercury oxidation on selective catalytic reduction catalysts under coal-derived flue gas. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55:1866-1875.
14. Hong H.J., Ham S.W., Kim M.H., et al. Characteristics of commercial selective catalytic reduction catalyst for the oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury with respect to reaction conditions. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 1-6.
15. Vosteen B.W., Kanefke R., Köser H. Bromine-enhanced mercury abatement from combustion flue gases-recent industrial applications and laboratory research. VGB PowerTech 2006, 86:70-75.
16. Aylett B.J. Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry 1975, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
17. Fahlke J., Bursik A. Impact of the state-of-the-art of flue gas cleaning on mercury species emissions from coal-fired steam generators. Water, Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 80:209-215.
18. UNEP: Process Optimisation Guidance for Reducing Mercury Emissions from Coal Combustion, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
19. Basu B., Butler J., Leon M. Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants. Renew. Energ. 2011, 36:282-288.
20. VGB Powertech: VGB Standard Bauart, Betrieb und Wartung von Rauchgasentstickungsanlagen (DeNOx), VGB-Standard-S-014-2011-DE, Essen, 2011.
21. 2-supported vanacia tungsta commercial catalyst. Catal. Today 2000, 60:73-82.
22. VGB guideline VGB-R 302 H e: guideline for the testing of DeNOx catalysts. Second ed., VGB, Essen, 1998.
23. VDI Norm 2462 Bl. 2: Messen gasförmiger Emissionen, Bestimmung von Schwefeloxiden. VDI/DIN-Handbuch Reinhaltung der Luft, Band 5, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 2011.
24. 2 oxidation over DeNOx-SCR catalysts. Catal. Today 1996, 27:15-21.
25. x by ammonia over oxide catalysts: a review. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 1998, 18:1-36.
26. 3 over honeycomb DeNOxing catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32:1053-1060.
27. Beck J. The behaviour of phosphorous compounds and their effect an De-NOx-catalysts in coal fired power plants 2007, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.
28. 3-Wabenkatalysatoren. Chem. Ing. Tech. 1990, 62:60-61.
29. Binder-Begsteiger I. Improved emission control due to a new generation of high-void-fraction SCR-DeNOx catalysts. Catal. Today 1996, 27:3-8.
30. Tronconi E., Beretta A. The role of inter- and intra-phase mass transfer in the SCR-DeNOx-reaction over catalysts of different shapes. Catal. Today 1992, 52:249-258.
31. x emission control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1991, 30:969-978.
32. 3 over honeycomb DeNoxing catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32:826-834.
33. 3-conversion. Fuel 2012, 101:179-186.
34. Dunn J., Stenger H.G., Wachs I.E. Oxidation of sulfur dioxide over supported vanadia catalysts: molecular structure-reactivity relationships and reaction kinetics. Catal. Today 1999, 51:301-318.
35. Kolker A., Senior C.L., Quick J.C. Mercury in coal and the impact of coal quality on mercury emissions from combustion systems. Appl. Geochem. 2006, 21:1821-1836.
36. 2 supported metal oxide catalysts in coal combustion flue gas. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90:947-951.
37. Senior C.L. Oxidation of mercury across SCR catalysts in coal-fired power plants. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56:23-31.