A combined experimental-numerical investigation of fracture of polycrystalline cubic boron nitride

Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 99, Issue , 2013, Pages 101-117

  Carolan, D ^a   Ivankovic A ^a   Murphy, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Brittle fracture; Cohesive zone model; Finite volume method; OpenFOAM ext

Indexed keywords

COHESIVE ZONE MODEL; FRACTURE LOAD; MICRO-STRUCTURAL LENGTH; NOTCH ROOT RADIUS; OPENFOAM-EXT; POLYCRYSTALLINE CUBIC BORON NITRIDE; SINGLE EDGE V-NOTCHED BEAM TEST; SYSTEM DYNAMICS;

BRITTLE FRACTURE; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; LOADING;

CUBIC BORON NITRIDE;

EID: 84875236138     PISSN: 00137944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Nabhani F. Machining of aerospace titanium alloys. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 2001, 17:99-106.
2. Petrusha I. Cubic boron nitride for cutting nickel base materials. Met Powder Rep 1998, 2:41.
3. Ding X., Liew W., Liu X. Evaluation of machining performance of MMC with PCBNand PCDtools. Wear 2005, 259:1225-1234.
4. Heath P. Properties and uses of Amborite. Carbide Tool J 1987, 19(2):12-22.
5. Bailey M., Juchem H., Cook M., Collins J., Butler-Smith P. The increasing importance of PCD/diamond/CVDD and PCBN/cBN tooling in the automotive industry. Ind Diam Rev 2002, 62(592):53-60.
6. Fleming M., Wickham A. PCBNin the automotive industry. Ind Diam Rev 2006, 2:26-32.
7. E. A. Materials, Element Six, Advanced Materials, PCBN Metalworking, Marketing Brochure.
8. Bex P., Shafto G. The influence of temperature and heating time on PCDperformance. Ind Diam Rev 1984, 3:128-132.
9. Clark I., Sen P. Advances in the development of ultrahard cutting tool materials. Ind Diam Rev 1998, 2:40-44.
10. Cook M., Bossom P. Trends and recent developments in the material manufacture and cutting tool application of polycrystalline diamond and polycrystalline cubic boron nitride. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 2000, 18:147-152.
11. Taylor D. Analysis of fatigue failures in components using the theory of critical distances. Engng Failure Anal 2005, 12:906-914.
12. Taylor D. The theory of critical distances. Engng Fract Mech 2008, 75:1696-1705.
13. Taylor D. Applications of the theory of critical distances in failure analysis. Engng Failure Anal 2011, 18:543-549.
14. Carolan D., Alveen P., Ivankovic A., Murphy N. Effect of notch root radius on the fracture toughness of polycrystalline cubic boron nitride. Engng Fract Mech 2011, 78(17):2885-2895.
15. Gomez G.G.F.J., Elices M. Failure criteria for linear elastic materials with u-notches. Int J Fract 2006, 141:13-99.
16. BSI. Advanced technical ceramics - Test methods for determination of fracture toughness of monolithic ceramics. Part 5: Single-edge Vee-notch beam (SEVNB) method. DD CEN 14425-5. British Standards Institution; 2004.
17. Rittel D., Belenky A., Bar-On I. Static and dynamic fracture of transparent nano-grained alumina. J Mech Phys Solids 2010, 58:484-501.
18. Weerasooriya T., Moy P., Casem D., Cheng M., Chen W. A four-point bend technique to determine dynamic fracture toughness of ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2006, 89(3):990-993.
19. Kim Y., Chao Y. Effect of loading rate on dynamic fracture initiation toughness of brittle materials. Int J Fract 2007, 145:195-204.
20. Kalthoff J. On the measurement of dynamic fracture toughness - a review of recent work. Int J Fract 1985, 27:277-298.
21. Rittel D., Weisbrod G. A method for dynamic fracture toughness determination using short beams. Int J Fract 2000, 104:89-103.
22. Petrović M. Mechanical and fracture properties of polycrystalline diamond as a function of rate and temperature. Ph.D. thesis. University College Dublin; 2011.
23. Damani R., Gstrein R., Danzer R. Critical notch-root radius effect in SENB-S fracture toughness testing. J Eur Ceram Soc 1996, 16(7):695-702.
24. Ritchie R., Knott J., Rice J. On the relation between the critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel. J Mech Phys Solids 1973, 21:395-410.
25. Demirdzić I., Martinovic D., Ivanković A. Numerical simulation of thermal deformation in welded specimens. Zavarivanje 1988, 31:209-219.
26. Ivanković A., Demirdzić I., Williams J., Leevers P. Application of the finite volume method to the analysis of dynamic fracture problems. Int J Fract 1994, 66:357-371.
27. Karac A., Ivankovic A. Behaviour of fluid filled PE containers under impact: theoretical and numerical investigation. Int J Impact Engng 2009, 36:621-631.
28. Ivankovic A. Finite volume modelling of dynamic fracture problems. Comput Modell Simulat Engng 1999, 4:227-235.
29. Karac A., Blackman B., Cooper V., Kinloch A., Rodriguez-Sanchez S., Teo W., et al. Modelling the fracture behaviour of adhesively bonded joints as a function of test rate. Engng Fract Mech 2011, 78:973-989.
30. Demirdzic I., Dzaferovic E., Ivankovic A. Finite volume approach to thermoviscoelasticity. Numer Heat Transfer, Part B 2005, 47:213-237.
31. Kanyanta V., Karac A., Ivankovic A. Validation of a fluid structure interaction numerical model for predicting flow transients in arteries. J Biomech 2009, 42:1705-1712.
32. Ivanković A., Pandya K., Williams J. Crack growth predictions in polyethylene using measured traction-separation curves. Engng Fract Mech 2004, 71:657-668.
33. Weller H., Tabor G., Jasak H., Fureby C. A tensorial approach to CFD using object oriented techniques. Comput Phys 1998, 12(6):620-631.
34. O.E.P. (-1.6-ext). http://www.extend-project.de.
35. Ivankovic A., Williams J. The finite volume analysis of linear elastic dynamic fracture problems. Dynamic fracture mechanics 1995, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton. M. Aliabadi (Ed.).
36. Rager A., Williams J., Ivankovic A. Numerical analysis of the three point bend impact test for polymers. Int J Fract 2005, 135:199-215.
37. Chandra N., Li H., Shet G., Ghonem H. Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal ceramic interfaces. Int J Solids Struct 2002, 39:2827-2855.
38. Rots J. Strain-softening analysis of concrete fracture specimens. Fracture toughness and fracture energy of concrete 1986, 137-148. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. F. Wittmann (Ed.).
39. Kubler J. Fracture toughness of ceramics using the SEVNB method: from a preliminary study to a test method. In: Salem GQJA, Jenkins M, editors. Fracture resistance testing of monolithic and composite brittle materials. ASTM, International; 2002. p. 93-106.
40. Elices M., Guinea G.V., Gomez J., Planas J. The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges. Engng Fract Mech 2002, 69:137-163.
41. Carolan D., Ivankovic A., Murphy N. Thermal shock resistance of polycrystalline cubic boron nitride. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 2012, 32:2581-2586.