A taxonomy of design methods process models

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 795-821

  Céret, Eric ^a   Dupuy Chessa, Sophie ^a   Calvary, Gaëlle ^b   Front, Agnès ^a   Rieu, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b GRENOBLE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

Characterization; Design methods; Process models; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION OF CHARACTERISTICS; DESIGN METHOD; EVALUATION RESULTS; HIGH QUALITY; INTENTION TO USE; PROCESS MODEL;

CHARACTERIZATION; TAXONOMIES; TOOLS; WEBSITES;

DESIGN;

EID: 84875231909     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. F. Garzotto, and V. Perrone Industrial acceptability of web design methods: an empirical study Journal of Web Engineering 6 2007 73 96
2. C. Barry, and M. Lang A survey of multimedia and web development techniques and methodology usage IEEE Multimedia 8 2001 52 60
3. B. Fitzgerald An empirical investigation into the adoption of systems development methodologies Information and Management 34 1998 317 328
4. N. Jayaratna Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD, a Systematic Framework 1994 McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, NY, USA
5. G. Booch Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications second ed. 1993 Addison-Wesley Professional
6. Harmsen Situational Method Engineering 1997 University of Twente, Moret Ernst & Young Management Consultants
7. W.S. Humphrey The software engineering process: definition and scope SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 14 1988 82 83
8. W. Scacchi Process Models in Software Engineering Encyclopedia of Software Engineering second ed. 2001 John Wiley and Sons
9. I. Sommerville Software engineering Pearson Education 2001 10
10. M. Beaudouin-Lafon, Designing interaction, not interfaces, in: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2004, pp. 15-22.
11. I. Sommerville Software process models ACM Computing Surveys 28 1996 269 271
12. C. Hug, A. Front, D. Rieu, A Process Engineering Method based on a Process Domain Model and Patterns, in: International Workshop MoDISE-EUS 2008 (Model Driven Information Systems Engineering: Enterprise, User and System Models), Held in Conjunction with CAISE 2008, Montpellier, France, 2008.
13. A. Seffah, J. Gulliksen, and M.C. Desmarais Human-Centered Software Engineering - Integrating Usability in the Software Development Lifecycle first ed. 2005 Springer
14. J. Carter, J. Liu, K. Schneider, D. Fourney, Transforming usability engineering requirements into software engineering specifications: from PUF to UML, in: A. Seffah, J. Gulliksen, M.C. Desmarais (Eds.), Human-Centered Software Engineering - Integrating Usability in the Software Development Lifecycle, Springer, Netherlands, 2005, pp. 147-169.
15. X. Ferre, N. Juristo, and A. Moreno Which, when and how usability techniques and activities should be integrated A. Seffah, J. Gulliksen, M.C. Desmarais, Human-Centered Software Engineering - Integrating Usability in the Software Development Lifecycle 2005 Springer Netherlands 173 200
16. B. Boehm A spiral model of software development and enhancement SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 11 1986 14 24
17. L.C. Alexander, A.M. Davis, Criteria for selecting software process models, in: Computer Software and Applications Conference, 1991, COMPSAC '91., Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual International, 1991, pp. 521 -528.
18. G. Pérez, K. El Emam, and N. Madhavji Customising software process models W. Schäfer, Software Process Technology 1995 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 70 78
19. I. Sharon, M. dos S. Soares, J. Barjis, J. van den Berg, J.L.M. Vrancken, A Decision Framework for Selecting a Suitable Software Development Process, in: ICEIS'10, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 2010, pp. 34-43.
20. S.K. Card, Pioneers and settlers: methods used in successful user interface design, in: Proceedings of a Workshop on Human-computer Interface Design: Success Stories, Emerging Methods, and Real-world Context: Success Stories, Emerging Methods, and Real-world Context, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995, pp. 122-169.
21. J. Martin Rapid Application Development 1991 Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. Indianapolis, IN, USA
22. K. Beck Embracing change with extreme programming IEEE Computer 32 1999 70 77
23. D.J. Anderson, Feature-Driven Development: Towards a TOC, Lean and Six Sigma Solution for, Software Engineering, 2004.
24. M. Fowler, and J. Highsmith The Agile Manifesto, Software Development 2001 Miller Freeman, Inc pp. 28-32
25. I. Jacobson, G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh The Unified Software Development Process 1999 Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA
26. A. Cockburn Unraveling incremental development Object Magazine 1995 49 51
27. O. Benediktsson, D. Dalcher, K. Reed, and M. Woodman COCOMO-based effort estimation for iterative and incremental software development Software Quality Journal 11 2003 265 281
28. D. Graham Incremental development: review of nonmonolithic life-cycle development models Information and Software Technology 31 1989 7 20
29. P. Kruchten The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction third ed. 2003 Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA
30. K. Schwaber, SCRUM Development Process, in: Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA), 1995, pp. 117-134.
31. P. Coad, E. Lefebvre, and E. DeLuca Java Modeling in Color with UML: Enterprise Components and Process 1999 Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ
32. R.F. Graf Modern dictionary of electronics Newnes 1999
33. J.-P. Stromboni, Analyse de la granularité des applications régulières, in: 16°Colloque sur le traitement du signal et des images, GRETSI, Groupe d'Etudes du Traitement du Signal et des Images, Grenoble, 1997, pp. 1299-1302.
34. V. Messager Rota, Gestion de projet: vers les méthodes agiles, Eyrolles, 2009.
35. P. Roques, F. Vallée, UML en action, Eyrolles, Paris, France, 2002.
36. I. Hassine, D. Rieu, F. Bounaas, O. Segrouchni, Symphony: a conceptual model based on business components, in: SMC'02, IEEE International Conference, Hammamet, Tunisia, 2002.
37. W.S. Humphrey, and M.I. Kellner Software process modeling: principles of entity process models Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Engineering 1989 ACM New York, NY, USA 331 342
38. C. Morley, Gestion d'un projet système d'information: principes, techniques, mise en œuvre, Masson, 1998.
39. R. Descartes, Discours de la méthode, 1861.
40. R. Feynman, Personal Observations on the Reliability of the SHUTTLE, Washington, DC, USA, 1986.
41. M. Pizka, A. Bauer, A brief top-down and bottom-up philosophy on software evolution, in: International Workshop On Principles of Software Evolution, 2004, pp. 131-136.
42. M. Dowson, Iteration in the software process; review of the 3rd International Software Process Workshop, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1987, pp. 36-41.
43. C. Rolland, L'ingénierie des méthodes: une visite guidée, E-revue en Technologies de l'Information (e-TI), 2005.
44. P. Bresciani, P. Giorgini, F. Giunchiglia, J. Mylopoulos, A. Perini, Tropos: An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology, 2003.
45. S. Nurcan, A survey on the flexibility requirements related to business processes and modeling artifacts, in: HICSS, 2008, pp. 378-387.
46. C. Rolland From Conceptual Modeling to Requirements Engineering D. Embley, A. Olivé, S. Ram, Conceptual Modeling-ER 2006 2006 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 5 11
47. W.W. Royce, Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1987, pp. 328-338.
48. B. Henderson-Sellers, and J.M. Edwards The object-oriented systems life cycle Communications of the ACM 33 1990 142 159
49. M. Benabdellatif, Process modelling analysis: comparison between activity-oriented models, product-oriented models and decision-oriented models, in: Data Mining II, A. Zanasi, C.A. Brebbia, N.F.F. Ebecken, P. Melli (Editors), Southampton, SO40 7AA, UK, 2002, pp. 251-258.
50. J. Börstler Experience with work-product oriented software development projects Journal of Computer Science Education 11 2001 111 133
51. M. Jarke, J. Bubenko, C. Rolland, A. Sutcliffe, Y. Vassilou, Theories underlying requirements engineering: an overview of NATURE at Genesis, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, San Diego, CA, USA, 1993, pp. 19-31.
52. C. Rolland, A Comprehensive View of Process Engineering, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 1998, pp. 1-24.
53. K. Pohl, P. Assenova, R. Doemges, P. Johannesson, N. Maiden, V. Plihon, et al., Applying AI Techniques to Requirements Engineering: The NATURE Prototype, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Research Issues in the Intersection Between Software Engineering and, Artificial Intelligence, 1994.
54. C. Rolland, N. Prakash, and A. Benjamen A multi-model view of process modelling Requirements Engineering 4 1999 169 187
55. S. Brinkkemper, M. Saeki, F. Harmsen, Assembly Techniques for Method Engineering, in: Proceedings of CAISE'98, Pisa, Italy, 1998.
56. J. Ralyté, R. Deneckère, and C. Rolland Towards a Generic Model for Situational Method Engineering J. Eder, M. Missikoff, Advanced Information Systems Engineering 2003 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 1029
57. G. Guzelian, Conception de systèmes d'information, une approche orientée service, PhD dissertation, University Paul Cézanne, 2007.
58. W.S. Humphrey Managing the Software Process 1989 Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA
59. C. Potts, A generic model for representing design methods, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Engineering, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1989, pp. 217-226.
60. C. Rolland, A contextual approach for the requirements engineering process, in: SEKE, 1994, pp. 28-35.
61. C. Rolland, N. Prakash, and A. Benjamen A multi-model view of process modelling Requirements Engineering 4 1999 169 187
62. J. Eckstein Roles and Responsibilities in Feature Teams Agility Across Time and Space: Implementing Agile Methods in Global Software Projects 2010 Springer 289 297
63. A. Rochfeld, R. Colletti, H. Tardieu, La méthode Merise, tome 2: Démarche et pratiques, Editions d'Organisation, 1985.
64. H. Williams, A. Ferguson, The UCD Perspective: Before and After Agile, in: Proceedings of the AGILE 2007, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2007, pp. 285-290.
65. K. Phalp, and M. Shepperd Quantitative analysis of static models of processes Journal of Systems and Software 52 2000 105 112
66. N.B. Harrison, and J.O. Coplien Patterns of productive software organizations Bell Labs Technical Journal 1 1 1996 138 145
67. B.G. Cain, J.O. Coplien, and N.B. Harrison Social patterns in productive software development organizations Annals of Software Engineering 2 1996 259 286
68. H. Amblard, Les nouvelles approches sociologiques des organisations, Seuil, 1996.
69. J.W. Little, The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teacher's Professional Relations, Teacher's College Record, 1990, pp. 509-36.
70. C.B. Handy Understanding Organizations 1993 Oxford University Press, Inc. New York
71. R. Cerón, J. Dueñas, and J. de la Puente A first assessment of development processes with respect to product lines and component based development F. van der Linden, Software Architectures for Product Families 2000 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 158 167
72. J. Gulliksen, B. Göransson, I. Boivie, J. Persson, S. Blomkvist, and Å. Cajander Key Principles for User-Centred Systems Design A. Seffah, J. Gulliksen, M.C. Desmarais, Human-Centered Software Engineering - Integrating Usability in the Software Development Lifecycle 2005 Springer Netherlands 17 36
73. D.A. Norman, S.W. Draper, User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986.
74. ISO, Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems, 1999.
75. J. Karat User centered design: quality or quackery? Interactions 3 1996 18 20
76. J.D. Gould R.M. Baecker, J. Grudin, W.A.S. Buxton, S. Greenberg, Human-Computer Interaction 1995 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA 93 121
77. J.M. Greenbaum, and M. Kyng Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems 1991 Routledge
78. J. Nielsen Iterative user-interface design Computer 26 1993 32 41
79. M. Maguire Methods to support human-centred design International Journal Human-Computer Studies 55 2001 587 634
80. J.-Y. Mao, K. Vredenburg, P.W. Smith, T. Carey, User-centered design methods in practice: a survey of the state of the art, in: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, IBM Press, 2001, pp. 12-25.
81. M. Pieper, K. Stroetmann, Participatory insight to universal access, in: Universal Access in Health Telematics: a Design Code of Practice, Stephanidis, Constantine, 2005, pp. 271-296.
82. D.L. Morgan The Focus Group Guidebook 1998 SAGE
83. R.W. Root, S. Draper, Questionnaires as a software evaluation tool, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1983, pp. 83-87.
84. M. Maguire, N. Bevan, User requirements analysis: a review of supporting methods, in: Proceedings of the IFIP 17th World Computer Congress-TC13 Stream on Usability: Gaining a Competitive Edge, Kluwer, B.V., Deventer, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, 2002, pp. 133-148.
85. L.L. Constantine, R. Biddle, J. Noble, Usage-centered design and software engineering: models for integration, in: ICSE Workshop on SE-HCI'03, 2003, pp. 106-113.
86. J. Ferreira, J. Noble, and R. Biddle The semiotics of usage-centred design P.-J. Charrel, D. Galarreta, Project Management and Risk Management in Complex Projects 2007 Springer Netherlands 211 229
87. G. Lindgaard, R. Dillon, P. Trbovich, R. White, G. Fernandes, and S. Lundahl User needs analysis and requirements engineering: Theory and practice Interacting with Computers 18 2006 47 70
88. J. McDermid, and K. Ripken Life cycle support in the ADA environment ADA Letter III 1983 57 62
89. P. Kroll, and P. Kruchten The Rational Unified Process Made Easy: A Practitioner's Guide to the RUP 2003 Addison Wesley
90. T. Chklovski, User interfaces with semi-formal representations: a study of designing argumentation structures, in: Under Review for the Intelligent User Interfaces Conference, 2005, pp. 130-136.
91. R.N. Charette Large-scale project management is risk management IEEE Software 13 1996 110 117
92. Y.W. Kim, Efficient use of code coverage in large-scale software development, in: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, IBM Press, 2003, pp. 145-155.
93. B.W. Boehm, R.K. McClean, D.B. Urfrig, Some experience with automated aids to the design of large-scale reliable software, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Reliable Software, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1975, pp. 105-113.
94. Project sizes-small, medium and large, Method123 Project Management, Methodology. (n.d.).
95. B.W. Boehm, B. Clark, E. Horowitz, J.C. Westland, R.J. Madachy, and R.W. Selby Cost Models for Future Software Life Cycle Processes: COCOMO 2.0 Annals of Software Engineering 1 1995 57 94
96. A.L. Rollo, Functional size measurement and COCOMO - a synergistic approach, in: Proceedings, Rome, Italy, 2006, pp. p. 259-267.
97. M. Laanti, Implementing program model with agile principles in a large software development organization, in: Computer Software and Applications, 2008. COMPSAC'08. 32nd Annual IEEE International, 2008, pp. 1383-1391.
98. L. Rising, and N.S. Janoff The Scrum software development process for small teams Software, IEEE 17 2000 26 32
99. R. Spencer, The streamlined cognitive walkthrough method, working around social constraints encountered in a software development company, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2000, pp. 353-359.
100. M.A. Cusumano, and R.W. Selby How Microsoft builds software Communications of the ACM 40 1997 53 61
101. E. Yourdon Death March: The Complete Software Developer's Guide to Surviving "Mission Impossible" Projects 1999 Prentice Hall PTR
102. L. Westfall, Software risk management, in: Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
103. G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, and D. Thevenin A Unifying Reference Framework for the Development of Plastic User Interfaces M. Little, L. Nigay, Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction 2001 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 173 192
104. D.L. Moody, The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods, in: ECIS, 2003.
105. D. Moody, G. Sindre, T. Brasethvik, and A. Sølvberg Evaluating the Quality of Process Models: Empirical Testing of a Quality Framework S. Spaccapietra, S. March, Y. Kambayashi, Conceptual Modeling - ER 2002 2003 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 380 396
106. S. Blomkvist Towards a Model for Bridging Agile Development and User-Centered Design A. Seffah, J. Gulliksen, M.C. Desmarais, Human-Centered Software Engineering - Integrating Usability in the Software Development Lifecycle 2005 Springer Netherlands 219 244
107. R. Gong, D. Kieras, A validation of the GOMS model methodology in the development of a specialized, commercial software application, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Celebrating Interdependence, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1994, pp. 351-357.
108. S. Dupuy-Chessa, G. Godet-Bar, J.-L. Pérez-Medina, D. Rieu, and D. Juras A Design process integrating mixed system into information systems E. Dubois, P. Gray, L. Nigay, The Engineering of Mixed Reality Systems 2009 Springer Chapter 15
109. E. Ceret, S. Dupuy-Chessa, G. Godet-Bar, Using software metrics in the evaluation of a conceptual component model, in: RCIS, 2010, pp. 507-514.
110. F.D. Davis User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 1993 475 487
111. comScore Releases May 2011 U.S. Search Engine Rankings-comScore, Inc., (n.d.).
112. J.E. Cook, and A.L. Wolf Software process validation: quantitatively measuring the correspondence of a process to a model ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 8 1999 147 176
113. M. O'Reilly Extreme Programming Pocket Guide first ed. 2003 O'Reilly Media Inc Sebastopol, CA, USA
114. P.J. Agerfalk, and B. Fitzgerald Flexible and distributed software processes: old petunias in new bowls? Communications of the ACM 49 2006 26 34
115. F. Harmsen, S. Brinkkemper, J.L.H. Oei, Situational method engineering for informational system project approaches, in: Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life, Cycle, 1994, pp. 169-194.
116. B. Fitzgerald The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study Information Systems Journal 7 1997 201 212
117. J. McDermid, and K. Ripken Life Cycle Support in the ADA Environment 1984 Cambridge University Press New York, NY, USA
118. C. Rolland, C. Salinesi, Supporting requirements elicitation through goal/scenario coupling, in: Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications, 2009, pp. 398-416.
119. N. Cross Engineering Design Methods 1989 John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, England
120. S. Brinkkemper, M. Saeki, and F. Harmsen Meta-modelling based assembly techniques for situational method engineering Information Systems 24 1999 209 228
121. J. Ralyté, Ingénierie des méthodes à base de composants, PhD thesis in Computer Science, Université Paris 1 - Sorbonne, 2001.
122. J.L. Kolodner, R.L.S. Jr, K. Sycara-Cyranski, A process model of cased-based reasoning in problem solving, in: IJCAI, 1985, pp. 284-290.
123. M. Paulk Using the Software CMM with Good Judgment ASQ Software Quality Professional 1 3 1999 19 29
124. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, J. Vlissides, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, 1995.
125. Django Software Foundation, Django, The Web Framework for Professionals with Deadlines, 2005.
126. K. Beck Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change 1999 Addison-Wesley Professional
127. D. Wells, Extreme Programming: A Gentle Introduction., (n.d.).
128. D. Wallace, I. Raggett, and J. Aufgang Extreme Programming for Web Projects 2002 Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA
129. K. Beck, and M. Fowler Planning Extreme Programming first ed. 2000 Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA
130. J.W. Helms Developing and Evaluating the (LUCID/Star)*Usability Engineering Process Model 2001 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
131. N. Aussenac-Gilles, and N. Matta Making a method of problem solving explicit with MACAO International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40 1994 193 219
132. M.S.V. Turner Microsoft® Solutions Framework Essentials: Building Successful Technology Solutions 2006 Microsoft Press
133. J.-C. Tarby, M.-F. Barthet, The DIANE+ Method, in: CADUI, 1996, pp. 95-120.
134. J. Stapleton, DSDM, Dynamic Systems Development Method: the Method in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997, p. 163.