Multidisciplinary cancer team meeting structure and treatment decisions: A prospective correlational study

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 715-722

  Lamb, B W ^a,b   Sevdalis, N ^a   Benn, J ^a   Vincent, C ^a   Green, J S A ^b  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b WHIPPS CROSS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER THERAPY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; TEAMWORK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84875228372     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2691-x     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. C Taylor AJ Munro R Glynne-Jones, et al. 2010 Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ 340 c951 20332315 10.1136/bmj.c951
2. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on cancer services improving outcomes in urological cancers. The Manual. London, UK: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2002.
3. The Department of Health. Manual for cancer services. London, UK: The Department of Health, 2004.
4. Circulaire DGS/DH/AFS n° 98-213 Relative a l'organisation des soins en cancerologie dans les etablissements d'hospitalisation publics et prives. Paris, France. 1998;98[17]:177-191.
5. American College of Surgeons: Commission on cancer. Cancer program standards. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2004, revised 2009. http://facs.org/cancer/coc/programstandards.html. Accessed 1 February 2012.
6. B McAvoy 2003 Optimising cancer care in Australia. Melbourne: National Cancer Control Initiative Aust Fam Physician. 32 369 372 12772373
7. B Lamb K Brown K Nagpal C Vincent JSA Green N Sevdalis 2011 Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review Ann Surg Oncol. 18 2116 2125 21442345 10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6
8. E Newman A Guest M Helvie, et al. 2006 Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumour board Cancer 107 2343 2351 10.1002/cncr.22266
9. NJ Hong FC Wright AR Gagliardi LF Paszat 2010 Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review J Surg Oncol. 102 125 134 20648582 10.1002/jso.21589
10. Y Bogenstätter F Tschan NK Semmer M Spychiger M Breuer S Marsch 2009 How accurate is information transmitted to medical professionals joining a medical emergency? A simulator study Hum Factors 51 2 115 125 19653477 10.1177/0018720809336734
11. JR Larson C Christensen TM Franz AS Abbott 1998 Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making J Pers Soc Psychol. 75 1 93 108 9686452 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.93
12. S Schulz-Hardt FC Brodbeck A Mojzisch R Kerschreiter D Frey 1996 Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality J Pers Soc Psychol. 91 6 1080 1093
13. P Jones MP Roelofsma 2000 The potential for social, contextual and group biases in team decision making: biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms Ergonomics 43 8 1129 1152 10975177 10.1080/00140130050084914 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjs1Wktg%3D%3D
14. JP Kahan RE Park L Leape, et al. 1996 Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures Med Care. 6 512 523 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00002
15. I Coulter A Adams P Shekelle 1995 Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel Health Serv Res. 30 577 591 7591782 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fgs1aguw%3D%3D
16. B Lamb JSA Green C Vincent N Sevdalis 2011 Decision making in surgical oncology Surg Oncol. 20 163 168 20719499 10.1016/j.suronc.2010.07.007 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3Mjmtlehug%3D%3D
17. N Houssami R Sainsbury 2006 Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes Eur J Cancer. 42 2480 2491 16904313 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.023
18. EM Kesson GM Allardice WD George HJ Burns DS Morrison 2012 Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13,722 women BMJ 344 e2718 22539013 10.1136/bmj.e2718
19. F Leo N Venissac M Poudenx, et al. 2007 Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer: how to test its efficacy? J Thorac Oncol. 2 69 72 17410013 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31802bff56
20. J Stalfors C Lundberg T Westin 2007 Quality assessment of a multidisciplinary tumour meeting for patients with head and neck cancer Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 127 82 87 10.1080/00016480600740589
21. B Lamb H Wong C Vincent JSA Green N Sevdalis 2011 Teamwork and team performance in urological multidisciplinary cancer teams: development and evaluation of an observational assessment tool BMJ Qual Saf. 20 849 856 21610266 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.048660
22. BW Lamb N Sevdalis H Mostafid C Vincent JSA Green 2011 Teamwork and clinical decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer teams: prospective multimethod investigation using cross-validated assessment tools Ann Surg Oncol. 18 13 3535 3543 21594706 10.1245/s10434-011-1773-5 1:STN:280: DC%2BC38%2FhsFWnsA%3D%3D
23. L Hull S Arora E Kassab RL Kneebone N Sevdalis 2011 Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS): content validation and tool refinement J Am Coll Surg. 212 234 243 21276535 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.11.001
24. N Sevdalis M Lyons AN Healey S Undre A Darzi CA Vincent 2009 Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery: construct validation with expert vs. novice raters Ann Surg. 249 1047 1051 19474694 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a50220
25. C Vincent K Moorthy SK Sarker, et al. 2004 Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement Ann Surg. 239 475 482 15024308 10.1097/01.sla.0000118753.22830.41
26. S Undre S Arora N Sevdalis 2009 Surgical performance, human error and patient safety in urological surgery Br J Med Surg Urol. 2 1 2 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2008.11.004
27. Department of Health. National Cancer Patient Experience Survey Programme. 2010 National Survey Report. London, UK: Department of Health, 2010.
28. C Taylor JM Sippitt G Collins C McManus A Richardson J Dawson M Richards AJ Ramirez 2010 A pre-post test evaluation of the impact of the PELICAN MDT-TME Development Programme on the working lives of colorectal cancer team members BMC Health Serv Res. 10 187 20587062 10.1186/1472-6963-10-187
29. BW Lamb N Sevdalis C Taylor C Vincent JS Green 2012 Multidisciplinary team working across different tumour types: analysis of a national survey Ann Oncol. 23 5 1293 1300 22015450 10.1093/annonc/mdr453 1:STN:280: DC%2BC38zms1yksg%3D%3D Epub 2011 Oct 19