Targeted angiography research: 207 Adult cases

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 326-329

  Saunders, Sarah L ^a   Amoroso, Jasmin ^a   Morgan, Bruno ^b   Rutty, Guy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b LEICESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; BEREAVEMENT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONER; FEMALE; FORENSIC PATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELECONSULTATION; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; TOXICOLOGY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ATTITUDE TO DEATH; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ETHICS; FAMILY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH SUBJECT; TELEPHONE; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; ATTITUDE TO DEATH; AUTOPSY; BEREAVEMENT; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CORONERS AND MEDICAL EXAMINERS; ENGLAND; FAMILY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; TELEPHONE; THIRD-PARTY CONSENT; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875221153     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: 14724146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201250     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Tsitsikas DA, Brothwell M, Chin AJA, et al. The attitudes of relatives to autopsy: A misconception. J Clin Pathol 2011;64:412-14.
2. Burton JL, Rutty GN. The hospital autopsy: A manual of fundamental autopsy practice. 3rd edn. London: Arnold, 2010.
3. HMSO. The Coroners (Amendment) Rules 2005. Statutory Instrument 2005 No 420. 2005;420:1-5.
4. Saunders SL, Morgan B, Raj V, et al. Targeted post-mortem computed tomography cardiac angiography; proof of concept. Int J Legal Med 2011;13:79-82.
5. Rutty GN, Rutty JE. Perceptions of near virtual autopsies. J Forensic Leg Med 2011;18:306-9.
6. Millar T, Walker R, Arango J-, et al. Tissue and organ donation for research in forensic pathology: The MRC Sudden Death Brain and Tissue Bank. J Pathol 2007;213:369-75.
7. Thayyil S, Robertson NJ, Scales A, et al. Prospective parental consent for autopsy research following sudden unexpected childhood deaths: A successful model. Arch Dis Child 2001;94:354-8.
8. Limacher E, Carr U, Bowker L, et al. Reversing the slow death of the clinical necropsy: Developing the post of the Pathology Liaison Nurse. J Clin Pathol 2007;60:1129-34.
9. Millar T, Lerpiniere C, Walker R, et al. Postmortem tissue donation for research: A positive opportunity? Br J Nurs 2008;17:644-9.
10. Thayyil S, Robertson NJ, Sebire NJ, et al. Post-mortem MR and Ct imaging in fetuses, newborns and children: An evidenced based approach. Diagn Histopathol 2010;16:565-72.
11. Thayyil S, Robertson NJ, Scales A, et al. Parental consent for research and sudden infant death. Lancet 2008;372:715.
12. Snowdon C, Elbourne DR, Garcia J. Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: Attitudes of bereaved parents. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:F208-11.
13. Womack C, Jack AL. Family attitudes to research using samples taken at coroner's postmortem examinations: Review of records. BMJ 2003;327:781-2.
14. Jack AL, Womack C. Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: Review of records. BMJ 2003;327:262.