A public private people partnerships (P4) process framework for infrastructure development in Hong Kong

Cities

Volumn 31, Issue , 2013, Pages 370-381

  Ng, S Thomas ^a   Wong, James M W ^a   Wong, Kelwin K W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Hong Kong; Infrastructure development; Public participation; Public private partnership; Social economic concerns

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; STAKEHOLDER; UNDERPINNING;

CHINA; HONG KONG;

EID: 84875220877     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahmed S.A., Ali S.M. People as partners: Facilitating people's participation in public-private partnerships for solid waste management. Habitat International 2006, 30(4):781-796.
2. Akintoye A., Hardcastle C., Beck M., Chinyio E., Asenova D. Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurement. Construction Management and Economics 2003, 21(5):461-470.
3. Alexander D. Planning as learning: Sustainability and the education of citizen activists. Environments 1999, 27(2):79-87.
4. Alexander E. Public participation in planning - A multidimensional model: The case of Israel. Planning Theory & Practice 2008, 9(1):57-80.
5. Anex R.P., Focht W. Public participation in life cycle assessment and risk assessment: A shared need. Risk Analysis 2002, 22(5):861-877.
6. Arnstein S. The ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the Institute of American Planners 1969, 35(4):216-224.
7. Bagaeen S.G. Redeveloping former military sites: Competitiveness, urban sustainability and public participation. Cities 2006, 23(5):339-352.
8. Barnes M. Researching public participation. Local Government Studies 2000, 25(4):60-75.
9. Bennett, E., Seldon, J., & Grohmann, P. (2000). Joint venture public-private partnerships for urban environmental services. Report on UNDP/PPPUE's project development facility, PPPUE working paper series (Vol. II). New York: UNDP and Yale University.
10. Bickerstaff K., Tolley R., Walker G. Transport planning and participation the rhetoric and realities of public involvement. Journal of Transport Geography 2002, 10(1):61-73.
11. Bloomfield, D., Collins, K., Fry, C., & Munton, R. (1998). Deliberative and inclusionary processes: Their contribution to environmental governance. In Environmental governance: Responding to the challenge of deliberative democracy, Seminar. University College London. http://www.geog.ucl.ac.uk/esruvvv/dip/pub/dipfrm.htm.
12. Booth C., Richardson T. Placing the public in integrated transport planning. Transport Policy 2001, 8(2):141-149.
13. Brewer B., Hayllar M.R. CAPAM symposium on networked government: Building public trust through public-private partnerships. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2005, 71(3):475-492.
14. Burgess J.A. The application of stakeholder decision analysis to local environment agency plans. Technical report W114 1998, Environment Agency, Swindon, UK.
15. Burns D., Hamilton R., Hogged P. The politics of decentralisation: Revitalising local democracy 1994, MacMillan, London.
16. CEDD (2009). Public consultation/engagement guidelines. Technical circular no. 02/2009. Hong Kong: Civil Engineering and Development Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.
17. Chan C.W., Cheung P.T.Y., Chan E.Y.M., Lam W.F., Lam W.M., Lee E.W.Y., et al. From consultation to civic engagement: The road to better policy-making and governance in Hong Kong 2007, Bauhinia Foundation Research Centre, Hong Kong.
18. Creighton J.L. The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement 2005, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
19. Dickey J., Watts T. Analytic techniques in urban and regional planning 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York.
20. El-Gohary N.M., Osman H., El-Diraby T.E. Stakeholder management for public private partnerships. Journal of Project Management 2006, 24(7):595-604.
21. Frideres J.S., Fleishing U., Goldenberg S., DiSanto J. Community participation: Natural resource development in rural Alberta. A world of communities: Participatory research perspectives 1992, 191-203. Captus University Publications, Toronto. J.S. Frideres (Ed.).
22. Gallagher T.J., Jacobson W.S. The typography of environmental impact statements: Criteria, evaluation, and public participation. Environmental Management 1993, 17(1):99-109.
23. Goven J., Langer E.R. The potential of public engagement in sustainable waste management: Designing the future for biosolids in New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90(2):921-930.
24. Grimsey D., Lewis M. Are public private partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views. Accounting Forum 2005, 29(4):345-378.
25. Hanna K.S. The paradox of participation and the hidden role of information: A case study. Journal of the American Planning Association 2000, 66(4):398-410.
26. Higgs G., Berry R., Kidner D., Langford M. Using IT approaches to promote public participation in renewable energy planning: Prospects and challenges. Land Use Policy 2008, 25(4):596-607.
27. IAP2 (2009). Code of ethics for public participation practitioners. International Association for Public Participation. Accessed 07.08.09. http://iap2.affiniscape.com/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=8.
28. Krawchenko T., Stoney C. Public private partnerships and the public interest: A case study of Ottawa's Lansdowne Park development. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research 2011, 2(2):74-90.
29. Krueger R.A. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
30. Kumaraswamy M.M., Zhang X.Q. Governmental role in BOT-led infrastructure development. International Journal of Project Management 2001, 19(4):195-205.
31. Li, T. H. Y., Ng, S. T., & Wong, K. K. W. (2009). A framework of public engagement for PPP projects in China. In Proceedings of global innovation in construction conference 2009, Holywell Park, Loughborough University, UK.
32. Lo, W. C. W. (2002). Public participation in transport planning in Hong Kong - How well does the road infrastructure planning in Hong Kong encourage public participation? M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
33. Lui T.L. City-branding without content: Hong Kong's aborted West Kowloon mega-project, 1998-2006. International Development Planning Review 2008, 30(3):215-226.
34. Majamaa W., Junnila S., Doloi H., Niemistö E. End-user oriented public-private partnerships in real estate industry. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 2008, 12(1):1-17.
35. Manoliadis O., Tsolas O., Nakou A. Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: A Delphi study. Construction Management and Economics 2006, 24(2):113-120.
36. Morgan D.L. The focus group guidebook, focus group kit 1 1998, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
37. Mumtaz B., Wegelin E. Guiding cities 2001, UNDP/UNCHS/World Bank/DPU/HIS, London.
38. Petts J. Public participation and environmental impact assessment. Handbook of environmental impact assessment 1999, 145-177. Blackwell Science, Oxford. J. Petts (Ed.).
39. Planning Department (2005). Report of stage 1 public participation: Community's vision for Kai Tak. Accessed 09.02.10. http://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/p_study/prog_s/sek_09/website_chib5_eng/english/Stage_1_PP_report_Final_ENG.pdf.
40. Planning Department (2006a). Report of stage 2 public participation: Outline concept plans. Accessed 09.02.10. http://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/p_study/prog_s/sek_09/website_chib5_eng/english/Stage2_PP_Report_Eng.pdf.
41. Planning Department (2006b). Report of stage 3 public participation: Preliminary outline development plan. Accessed 09.02.10. http://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/p_study/prog_s/sek_09/website_chib5_eng/english/pp_stage3_e.html.
42. Reijniers J.J.A.M. Organization of public-private partnership projects: The timely prevention of pitfalls. International Journal of Project Management 1994, 12(3):137-142.
43. Renn O., Webler T., Wiedemann P. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse 1995, Klewer Academic Publishers, London.
44. Robinson J.B.L. Delphi technology for economic impact assessment. Journal of Transportation Engineering 1991, 117(3):531-549.
45. Rowe G., Horlick-Jones T., Walls J., Pidgeon N. Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: Reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public debate about transgenic crops. Public Understanding of Science 2005, 14(4):331-352.
46. Siemiatycki M. Delivering transportation infrastructure through public-private partnerships: Planning concerns. Journal of American Planning Association 2009, 76(1):43-58.
47. Sinclair A.J., Diduck A.P. Public involvement in EA in Canada: A transformative learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2001, 21(2):113-136.
48. Sterne P. Public consultation guide: Changing the relationship between Government and Canadians 1997, Canadian Centre for Management Development, Ottawa, Canada.
49. Stewart K. Designing good urban governance indicators: The importance of citizen participation and its evaluation in Greater Vancouver. Cities 2006, 23(3):196-204.
50. Susskind L. An alternative to Robert's rules of order for groups, organizations, and ad hoc assemblies that want to operate by consensus. The consensus building handbook 1999, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif. L. Susskind, S. McKearnan, J. Thomas-Larmer (Eds.).
51. Tang, T., Zhao, J., & Coleman, D. J. (2005). Design of a GIS-enabled online discussion forum for participatory planning. In Proceedings of the 4th annual public participation GIS conference, Cleveland, Ohio.
52. Treatmann F. Citizenship and consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture 2007, 7(2):147-158.
53. Tsang S., Burnett M., Hills P., Welford R. Trust, public participation and environmental governance in Hong Kong. Environmental Policy and Governance 2009, 19(2):99-114.