What is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1179-1184

  Trakarnsanga, Atthaphorn ^a   Gonen, Mithat ^a   Shia, Jinru ^a   Goodman, Karyn A ^a   Nash, Garrett M ^a   Temple, Larissa K ^a   Guillem, José G ^a   Paty, Philip B ^a   Garcia Aguilar, Julio ^a   Weiser, Martin R ^a,b  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUOROURACIL;

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISTANT METASTASIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM RESECTION; RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875208911     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2722-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. P Quirke P Durdey MF Dixon NS Williams 1986 Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: Histopathological study of lateral tumor spread and surgical excision Lancet. 2 996 999 2430152 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92612-7 1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2FjvVeksw%3D%3D
2. ID Nagtegaal AM Marijnen EK Kranenbarg CJ van de Velde JH van Krieken 2002 Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit Am J Surg Pathol. 26 350 357 11859207 10.1097/00000478-200203000-00009
3. IJ Adam MO Mohamdee IG Martin N Scott PJ Finan D Johnston, et al. 1994 Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer Lancet. 344 707 711 7915774 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92206-3 1:STN:280:DyaK2czlvFeisw%3D%3D
4. DF de Haas-Kock CG Baeten JJ Jager JA Langendijk LJ Schouten A Volovics JW Arends 1996 Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer Br J Surg. 83 781 785 8696739 10.1002/bjs.1800830617
5. HM Quah JF Chou M Gonen J Shia D Schrag LB Saltz, et al. 2008 Pathological stage is most prognostic of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation Cancer. 113 57 64 18442099 10.1002/cncr.23516
6. MR Weiser HM Quah J Shia JG Guillem PB Paty LK Temple, et al. 2009 Sphincter preservation in low anterior cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection Ann Surg. 249 236 242 19212176 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195e17c
7. ID Nagtegaal P Quirke 2008 What is the role of circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 26 303 312 18182672 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7027
8. HS Tilney S Rasheed JM Northover PP Tekkis 2009 Influence of circumferential resection margin on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery Dis Colon Rectum. 52 1723 1729 19966604 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b54fbd
9. K Shirouzu Y Akagi S Fujita H Ueno Y Takii K Komori, et al. 2011 The study group of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) on clinical significance of the mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Clinical significance of the mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: a Japanese multi-institutional study Ann Surg. 253 704 710 21475010 10.1097/SLA. 0b013e3182119331
10. IS Martijnse RL Dudink NP West D Wasowicz GA Nieuwenhuijzen I van Lijnschoten, et al. 2011 Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncological outcome Ann Surg Oncol. 19 786 793 21861224 10.1245/s10434-011-2004- 9
11. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The NCCN guideline TM version 1.2012 for rectal cancer. 2012. Available: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/ physician-gls/pdf/rectal. Accessed 1 Feb 2012.
12. TE Bernstein BH Endreseth P Romundstad A Wibe 2009 Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Group. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer Br J Surg. 96 1348 1357 19847867 10.1002/bjs.6739 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1MjhvFChuw%3D%3D
13. NR Hall PJ Finan T Al-Jaberi CS Tsang SR Brown MF Dixon, et al. 1998 Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent: predictor of survival but not local recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum. 41 979 983 9715152 10.1007/BF02237384 1:STN:280:DyaK1czotVyrtg%3D%3D
14. KF Birbeck CP Macklin NJ Tiffin W Parsons MF Dixon NP Mapstone, et al. 2002 Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery Ann Surg. 235 449 457 11923599 10.1097/00000658-200204000-00001
15. NP West PJ Finan C Anderin J Lindholm T Holm P Quirke 2008 Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominal excision for low rectal cancer J Clin Oncol. 26 3517 3522 18541901 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5961
16. K Bujiko MP Nowacki A Nasierowska-Guttmejer W Michalski M Bebenek M Pudełko, et al. 2004 Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomized trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy Radiother Oncol. 72 15 24 10.1016/j.radonc.2003.12.006