Do the protected areas network of the state of minas gerais maintain viable populations of the lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris)

Natureza a Conservacao

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 27-33

  Eduardo, Anderson Aires ^a   Nunes, André V ^b   Brito, Daniel ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Extinction; Population viability analysis; VORTEX

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875204799     PISSN: 16790073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2012.005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akçakaya HR & Sjögren-Gulve P. 2000. Population viability analyses in conservation planning: an overview. Ecological Bulletins, 48:9-21.
2. Alves RG et al., 2010. Análise da gestão das unidades de conservação do sistema estadual de áreas protegidas de Minas Gerais. Espaço e Geografia, 13:1-35.
3. Arponen A et al., 2010. Costs of integrating economics and conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 24:1198-1204. PMid:20575989. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01539.x
4. Boddicker M, Rodriguez JJ & Amanzo J, 2002. Indices for assessment and monitoring of large mammals within an adaptive management framework. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 76:105-123. PMid:12125745. http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/A:1015225022101
5. Brito D & Grelle CEV, 2004. Effectiveness of a reserve network for the conservation of the endemic marsupial Micoureus travassosi in Atlantic Forest remnants in southeastern Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13:2519-2536. http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000048450.85086.00
6. Brito D, Grelle CEV & Boubli JP, 2008. Is the Atlantic Forest protected area efficient in maintaining viable populations of Brachyteles hypoxanthus? Biodiversity & Conservation, 17:3255-3268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9427-z
7. Bruner AG et al., 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291:125-128. PMid:11141563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.125
8. Chiarello AG, 2000. Density and population size of mammals in remnants of Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Conservation Biology, 14:1649-1657. http://dx.doi. org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99071.x
9. Drummond GM et al., 2009. Biota Minas: diagnóstico do estado do conhecimento sobre a biodiversidade do Estado de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte: Fundação Biodiversitas.
10. Hildenbrandt H, Müller MS & Grimm V, 2006. How to detect and visualize extinction thresholds for structured PVA models. Ecological Modelling, 191:545-550. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.05.016
11. Lacy RC, Borbat M & Pollak JP, 2008. VORTEX: A stochastic simulation of the extinction process. version 9.92. Brookfield: Chicago Zoological Society.
12. Lima SG, Ribeiro GA & Gonçalves W, 2005. Avaliação da efetividade de manejo das unidades de conservação de proteção integral em Minas Gerais. Revista Árvore, 29:647-653.
13. McCarthy MA, Burgman MA & Ferson S. 1995. Sensitivity analysis for models of population viability. Conservation Biology, 73:93-100.
14. Médici EP et al., 2007. Workshop para a Conservação da Anta Brasileira: Relatório Final. Sorocaba: IUCN/SSC Tapir Specialist Group - TSG & IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group CBSG.
15. o 1119, de 14 de julho de 1944. In: Instituto Estadual de Florestas - IEF. Parque Estadual do Rio Doce. IEF. Available from:.
16. Mittermeier RA et al., 2005. Uma breve história da conservação da biodiversidade no Brasil. Megadiversidade, 1:14-20.
17. Naveda A et al., 2008. Tapirus terrestris. In: International Union for Conservation of Nature - IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN. Available from: .
18. Pressey R et al., 2007. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22:583-592. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.001
19. Rezende JLP et al., 2010. Avaliação da gestão das UC do Sistema Estadual de Áreas Protegidas de Minas Gerais. Revista Geografias, 06:87-106.
20. Rylands AB & Brandon K, 2005. Unidades de conservação brasileiras. Megadiversidade, 1:27-35.
21. Schmidt, NM & Jensen PM, 2003. Changes in mammalian body length over 175 years - Adaptations to a fragmented landscape? Conservation Ecology, 7:1-6.
22. Schnase J, Cushing J & Smith J, 2007. Biodiversity and ecosystem informatics. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 29:1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10844-006-0027-7
23. Stoner KE et al., 2007. The role of mammals in creating and modifying seedshadow in tropical forests and some possible consequences of their elimination. Biotropica, 39:316-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00292.x
24. Stein L, 2002. Creating a bioinformatics nation. Nature, 417:119-120. PMid:12000935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/417119a
25. Tilman D et al., 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371:65-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/371065a0
26. Traill LW, Bradshaw CJA & Brook BW, 2007. Minimum viable population size: A meta-analysis of 30 years of published estimates. Biological Conservation, 139:159-166. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.011
27. Wilson DE & Reeder DM, 2005. Mammal Species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic. Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press.